Literature DB >> 33466436

Vulnerable Workers and COVID-19: Insights from a Survey of Members of the International Commission for Occupational Health.

Jacques Tamin1, Oluranti Samuel2, Anna Suraya3, Ikenna D Ebuenyi4, Nisha Naicker5, Minha Rajput-Ray6.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted on the health and wellbeing of populations directly through infection, as well as through serious societal and economic consequences such as unemployment and underemployment. The consequences could be even more severe for those more vulnerable to the disease, such as the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. Indeed, there is evidence that such vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected in terms of both, their health and the socioeconomic impact. The aim of our study was to determine whether occupational health (OH) professionals thought that the COVID-19 pandemic might further disadvantage any particular group(s) of vulnerable workers globally, and if so, which group(s). A cross-sectional study was carried out with a sample of OH professionals by means of an online questionnaire which was shared via email within the ICOH (International Commission for Occupational Health) community. Data was collected over a period of two weeks in May 2020 and 165 responses from 52 countries were received. In this paper, the responses relating to questions about vulnerable workers are reported and discussed. Globally, our responders felt that those in less secure jobs (precarious employment (79%) and informal work (69%)), or unemployed (63%), were the most at risk of further disadvantage from this pandemic. The majority felt that their governments could act to mitigate these effects. There were suggestions of short-term alleviation such as financial and social support, as well as calls for fundamental reviews of the underlying inequalities that leave populations so vulnerable to a crisis such as COVID-19.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 pandemic; disadvantaged populations; poverty; public health practice; social determination of health; social justice; vulnerable populations; workers

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466436      PMCID: PMC7796473          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  16 in total

1.  Safely returning clinically vulnerable people to work.

Authors:  Ewan Macdonald; John Middleton; Drushca Lalloo; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-21

2.  Covid-19 in the workplace.

Authors:  Raymond M Agius; John F R Robertson; Denise Kendrick; Herb F Sewell; Marcia Stewart; Martin McKee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-21

3.  Why work is so problematic for people with disabilities and long-term health problems.

Authors:  Ralph Fevre
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 1.611

4.  Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities.

Authors:  Sridhar Venkatapuram
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Return to work for healthcare workers with confirmed COVID-19 infection.

Authors:  Joyce C Zhang; Aidan Findlater; Peter Cram; Anil Adisesh
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Behaviour of occupational health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  S Ranka; J Quigley; T Hussain
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Protecting healthcare workers from inhaled SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Authors:  John W Cherrie; Miranda Loh; Robert J Aitken
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  COVID-19: a new work-related disease threatening healthcare workers.

Authors:  Lode Godderis; Anke Boone; Jelena Bakusic
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.611

9.  Social Distancing and Public Health Guidelines at Workplaces in Korea: Responses to Coronavirus Disease-19.

Authors:  Eun-A Kim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 10.  Ethics and Occupational Health in the Contemporary World of Work.

Authors:  Sergio Iavicoli; Antonio Valenti; Diana Gagliardi; Jorma Rantanen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  4 in total

1.  Stress and Bio-Ethical Issues Perceived by Romanian Healthcare Practitioners in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Daniela Reisz; Iulia Crișan; Andrea Reisz; Raluca Tudor; Doina Georgescu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Global Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of the ICOH Survey.

Authors:  Bruna M Rondinone; Antonio Valenti; Valeria Boccuni; Erika Cannone; Fabio Boccuni; Diana Gagliardi; Pierluca Dionisi; Caterina Barillari; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2022-03-23

3.  Impact of COVID-19 emergency on the psychological well-being of susceptible individuals.

Authors:  Angela Stufano; Guglielmo Lucchese; Benjamin Stahl; Ignazio Grattagliano; Liliana Dassisti; Piero Lovreglio; Agnes Flöel; Ivo Iavicoli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Job Crafting: A Challenge to Promote Decent Work for Vulnerable Workers.

Authors:  Andrea Svicher; Annamaria Di Fabio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.