Literature DB >> 33466226

Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract to Prevent Postoperative Pneumonia and Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Robin Janssen1,2, Frans Van Workum3, Nikolaj Baranov3, Harmen Blok4, Jaap Ten Oever2,5, Eva Kolwijck6, Alma Tostmann2,7, Camiel Rosman3, Jeroen Schouten1,2.   

Abstract

Infectious complications occur frequently after esophagectomy. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) has been shown to reduce postoperative infections and anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery, but robust evidence for esophageal surgery is lacking. The aim was to evaluate the association between SDD and pneumonia, surgical-site infections (SSIs), anastomotic leakage, and 1-year mortality after esophagectomy. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in four Dutch hospitals between 2012 and 2018. Two hospitals used SDD perioperatively and two did not. SDD consisted of an oral paste and suspension (containing amphotericin B, colistin, and tobramycin). The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative pneumonia and SSIs. Secondary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and 1-year mortality. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between SDD and the relevant outcomes (odds ratio (OR)). A total of 496 patients were included, of whom 179 received SDD perioperatively and the other 317 patients did not receive SDD. Patients who received SDD were less likely to develop postoperative pneumonia (20.1% vs. 36.9%, p < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (10.6% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis showed that SDD is an independent protective factor for postoperative pneumonia (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.67, p < 0.001) and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.84, p = 0.011). Use of perioperative SDD seems to be associated with a lower risk of pneumonia and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anastomotic leakage; esophagectomy; pneumonia; postoperative infectious complications; selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466226      PMCID: PMC7824731          DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10010043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-6382


  28 in total

1.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections.

Authors:  T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third.

Authors:  I LEWIS
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1946-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Selective digestive tract decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination and antibiotic resistance in patients in intensive-care units: an open-label, clustered group-randomised, crossover study.

Authors:  Anne Marie G A de Smet; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Hetty E M Blok; Ellen M Mascini; Robin F J Benus; Alexandra T Bernards; Ed J Kuijper; Maurine A Leverstein-van Hall; Arjan R Jansz; Bartelt M de Jongh; Gerard J van Asselt; Ine H M E Frenay; Steven F T Thijsen; Simon N M Conijn; Jan A Kaan; Jan P Arends; Patrick D J Sturm; Martin C J Bootsma; Marc J M Bonten
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ming-ran Xie; Chang-qing Liu; Ming-fa Guo; Xin-yu Mei; Xiao-hui Sun; Mei-qing Xu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Selective decontamination to reduce gram-negative colonisation and infections after oesophageal resection.

Authors:  G W Tetteroo; J H Wagenvoort; A Castelein; H W Tilanus; C Ince; H A Bruining
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The gut microbiome and the mechanism of surgical infection.

Authors:  J C Alverdy; S K Hyoju; M Weigerinck; J A Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Learning Curve and Associated Morbidity of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Marianne H B C Stenstra; Gijs H K Berkelmans; Annelijn E Slaman; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Frits J H van den Wildenberg; Fatih Polat; Tomoyuki Irino; Magnus Nilsson; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D Luyer; Eddy M Adang; Gerjon Hannink; Maroeska M Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Preoperative airway colonization prior to transthoracic esophagectomy predicts postoperative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  M Bludau; A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; J M Leers; C A Gutschow; S Brinkmann; W Schröder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison of Early Surgical Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  Smita Sihag; Andrzej S Kosinski; Henning A Gaissert; Cameron D Wright; Paul H Schipper
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  The Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia.

Authors:  Morad Chughtai; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Nequesha Mohamed; Anton Khlopas; Jared M Newman; Rafay Khan; Ali Nadhim; Shervin Shaffiy; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2017-04-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Change of strategy to minimally invasive esophagectomy-Results at a certified center].

Authors:  Felix Merboth; Jasmin Hasanovic; Daniel Stange; Marius Distler; Sandra Kaden; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-12-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.