Literature DB >> 33466185

Different moxibustion therapies for urinary retention after anorectal surgery: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Jinwen Hu1, Yuepeng Sun1, Lili Cao2, Shulan Shen1, Xiaoyang Hu3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention is a disease that seriously affects human daily work and life, and greatly reduces people's quality of life and affects human health all over the world. Now, many studies have shown that moxibustion has a significant effect on postoperative urinary retention. In this study, network meta-analysis was used to analyze and compare the clinical efficacy and difference of different moxibustion treatments on postoperative urinary retention.
METHODS: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be included and all patients were diagnosed as postoperative urinary retention. Computer search Chinese databases: CNKI, Wanfang (WANFANG), VIP (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (SinoMed), English database search PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science. The search period limit is from the time the date of database establishment to November 17, 2020. To avoid omissions, we will manually search for relevant reference materials and conference papers. The risk of bias in the final included studies will be assessed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane System Intervention Review Manual. All data analysis will be conducted by Revman5.3, Gemtc 0.14.3, and Stata 14.2.
RESULTS: The effectiveness of each intervention was quantified. The main results included effective rate, first urination time, and residual urine volume.
CONCLUSION: Objective to provide evidence-based medicine basis for clinicians to choose more effective moxibustion therapy for postoperative urinary retention.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466185      PMCID: PMC7808490          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


  10 in total

1.  Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.

Authors:  A J Sutton; S J Duval; R L Tweedie; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Georgia Salanti; A E Ades; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention.

Authors:  Takayuki Toyonaga; Makoto Matsushima; Nobuhito Sogawa; Song Feng Jiang; Naomi Matsumura; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kazunori Suzuki; Junnichi Masuda; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection and urinary retention in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Celeste Y Kang; Obaid O Chaudhry; Wissam J Halabi; Vinh Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Severe Hydronephrosis and Perinephric Urinoma with Rupture of Renal Fornix Secondary to Postoperative Urinary Retention following Laparoscopic Umbilical Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Anthony Dakwar; James Wysock; James Satterfield
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-07-31

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of amfepramone and mazindol as a monotherapy for the treatment of obese or overweight patients.

Authors:  Rosa Camila Lucchetta; Bruno Salgado Riveros; Roberto Pontarolo; Rosana Bento Radominski; Michel Fleith Otuki; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Cassyano Januário Correr
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis for Identifying the Optimal Taxane-Based Chemotherapy Regimens for Treating Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Jia-Rui Wu; Xiao-Jiao Duan; Kai-Huan Wang; Yi Zhao; Meng-Wei Ni; Shu-Yu Liu; Xiao-Meng Zhang; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A E Ades; Mark Sculpher; Alex Sutton; Keith Abrams; Nicola Cooper; Nicky Welton; Guobing Lu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Julian P T Higgins; Dimitris Mavridis; Panagiota Spyridonos; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation.

Authors:  Jelena Savović; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne; Lucy Turner; Douglas G Altman; David Moher; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.