Literature DB >> 33465019

Biological Subphenotypes of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Show Prognostic Enrichment in Mechanically Ventilated Patients without Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Nanon F L Heijnen1, Laura A Hagens2, Marry R Smit2, Olaf L Cremer3, David S Y Ong4,5, Tom van der Poll6,7, Lonneke A van Vught2, Brendon P Scicluna6,8, Ronny M Schnabel1, Iwan C C van der Horst1, Marcus J Schultz2,9,10,11, Dennis C J J Bergmans1, Lieuwe D J Bos2,12.   

Abstract

Rationale: Recent studies showed that biological subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) provide prognostic enrichment and show potential for predictive enrichment.
Objectives: To determine whether these subphenotypes and their prognostic and potential for predictive enrichment could be extended to other patients in the ICU, irrespective of fulfilling the definition of ARDS.
Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study of adult patients admitted to the ICU. We tested the prognostic enrichment of both cluster-derived and latent-class analysis (LCA)-derived biological ARDS subphenotypes by evaluating the association with clinical outcome (ICU-day, 30-day mortality, and ventilator-free days) using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. We performed a principal component analysis to compare blood leukocyte gene expression profiles between subphenotypes and the presence of ARDS. Measurements and Main
Results: We included 2,499 mechanically ventilated patients (674 with and 1,825 without ARDS). The cluster-derived "reactive" subphenotype was, independently of ARDS, significantly associated with a higher probability of ICU mortality, higher 30-day mortality, and a lower probability of successful extubation while alive compared with the "uninflamed" subphenotype. The blood leukocyte gene expression profiles of individual subphenotypes were similar for patients with and without ARDS. LCA-derived subphenotypes also showed similar profiles. Conclusions: The prognostic and potential for predictive enrichment of biological ARDS subphenotypes may be extended to mechanically ventilated critically ill patients without ARDS. Using the concept of biological subphenotypes for splitting cohorts of critically ill patients could add to improving future precision-based trial strategies and lead to identifying treatable traits for all critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute respiratory distress syndrome; critically ill; personalized medicine; phenotypes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33465019     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2522OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  9 in total

1.  Identification of phenotypes in paediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a latent class analysis.

Authors:  Mary K Dahmer; Guangyu Yang; Min Zhang; Michael W Quasney; Anil Sapru; Heidi M Weeks; Pratik Sinha; Martha A Q Curley; Kevin L Delucchi; Carolyn S Calfee; Heidi Flori
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 2.  Phenotyping in acute respiratory distress syndrome: state of the art and clinical implications.

Authors:  Narges Alipanah; Carolyn S Calfee
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  New Insights into Clinical and Mechanistic Heterogeneity of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Summary of the Aspen Lung Conference 2021.

Authors:  Thomas R Martin; Rachel L Zemans; Lorraine B Ware; Eric P Schmidt; David W H Riches; Lisa Bastarache; Carolyn S Calfee; Tushar J Desai; Susanne Herold; Catherine L Hough; Mark R Looney; Michael A Matthay; Nuala Meyer; Samir M Parikh; Troy Stevens; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 7.748

4.  Metabolic signatures of ARDS and ARDS heterogeneity.

Authors:  Lucile Neyton; Carolyn S Calfee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 6.011

5.  Identification of persistent and resolving subphenotypes of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in two independent cohorts.

Authors:  Neha A Sathe; Leila R Zelnick; Carmen Mikacenic; Eric D Morrell; Pavan K Bhatraju; J Brennan McNeil; Susanna Kosamo; Catherine L Hough; W Conrad Liles; Lorraine B Ware; Mark M Wurfel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Identifying clinical and biochemical phenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to coronavirus disease-2019.

Authors:  Sylvia Ranjeva; Riccardo Pinciroli; Evan Hodell; Ariel Mueller; C Corey Hardin; B Taylor Thompson; Lorenzo Berra
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 7.  Promises and challenges of personalized medicine to guide ARDS therapy.

Authors:  Katherine D Wick; Daniel F McAuley; Joseph E Levitt; Jeremy R Beitler; Djillali Annane; Elisabeth D Riviello; Carolyn S Calfee; Michael A Matthay
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 19.334

8.  Slicing and dicing ARDS: we almost forgot the lungs.

Authors:  Marry R Smit; Lieuwe D J Bos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Towards a biological definition of ARDS: are treatable traits the solution?

Authors:  Lieuwe D J Bos; John G Laffey; Lorraine B Ware; Nanon F L Heijnen; Pratik Sinha; Brijesh Patel; Matthieu Jabaudon; Julie A Bastarache; Daniel F McAuley; Charlotte Summers; Carolyn S Calfee; Manu Shankar-Hari
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2022-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.