Literature DB >> 33464691

Gene expression comparison between primary estrogen receptor-positive and triple-negative breast cancer with paired axillary lymph node metastasis.

Marissa K Srour1, Ying Qu2, Nan Deng3, Kjirsten Carlson1, James Mirocha3, Bowen Gao2, Farnaz Dadmanesh4, Xiaojiang Cui2, Armando E Giuliano1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to characterize and compare changes in gene expression patterns of paired axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases from estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and triple-negative (TNBC) primary breast cancer (PBC). Patients with stage 2-3 PBC with macrometastasis to an ALN were selected. Gene expression of 2567 cancer-associated genes was analyzed with the HTG EdgeSeq system coupled with the Illumina Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platform. Changes in gene expression between ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative PBC, and their paired ALN metastases were compared with TNBC and their paired ALN metastases. Fourteen pairs of ER-positive and paired ALN metastasis were analyzed. Compared with the PBC, ALN metastasis had 673 significant differentially expressed genes, including 348 upregulated genes and 325 downregulated genes. Seventeen pairs of TNBC and paired ALN metastasis were analyzed. ALN metastasis had 257 significant differentially expressed genes, including 123 upregulated genes and 134 downregulated genes. When gene expression of the ALN for ER-positive PBC was compared to that of TNBC, 97 genes were upregulated in both, and 115 genes were similarly downregulated. Common upregulated genes were associated with cell death, necrosis, and homeostasis. Common downregulated genes were those of migration, degradation of extracellular matrix, and invasion. Although ER-positive PBC and TNBC have a distinct gene expression profiles and distinct changes from PBC to ALN metastases, a significant number of genes are similarly up- or downregulated. Understanding the role of these common genomic changes may provide clues to understanding the metastatic process itself.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer; gene expression; lymph node metastasis; triple-negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464691      PMCID: PMC8137535          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  22 in total

1.  Gene expression profiling of brain metastatic cell from triple negative breast cancer: Understanding the molecular events.

Authors:  Li Zhou; Hong-Fang Gao; Ding-Sheng Liu; Jin-Yi Feng; Dan-Dan Gao; Wei Xia
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Translational Genomics: Practical Applications of the Genomic Revolution in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lucy R Yates; Christine Desmedt
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in node-positive breast cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Pim J M Dings; Marloes A G Elferink; Luc J A Strobbe; Johannes H W de Wilt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Gene expression profiles of primary breast tumors maintained in distant metastases.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Annuska M Glas; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Anke T Witteveen; Johannes L Peterse; Laura J van't Veer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Gene expression comparison between primary triple-negative breast cancer and paired axillary and sentinel lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Marissa K Srour; Bowen Gao; Farnaz Dadmanesh; Kjirsten Carlson; Ying Qu; Nan Deng; Xiaojiang Cui; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  No common denominator for breast cancer lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  B Weigelt; L F A Wessels; A J Bosma; A M Glas; D S A Nuyten; Y D He; H Dai; J L Peterse; L J van't Veer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Gene Expression Meta-Analysis of Potential Metastatic Breast Cancer Markers.

Authors:  R Bell; R Barraclough; O Vasieva
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.222

8.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Gene Expression Profiling of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis.

Authors:  Ji Yun Lee; Kyunghee Park; Eunjin Lee; TaeJin Ahn; Hae Hyun Jung; Sung Hee Lim; Mineui Hong; In-Gu Do; Eun Yoon Cho; Duk-Hwan Kim; Ji-Yeon Kim; Jin Seok Ahn; Young-Hyuck Im; Yeon Hee Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Reactome pathway Knowledgebase.

Authors:  Antonio Fabregat; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Phani Garapati; Marc Gillespie; Kerstin Hausmann; Robin Haw; Bijay Jassal; Steven Jupe; Florian Korninger; Sheldon McKay; Lisa Matthews; Bruce May; Marija Milacic; Karen Rothfels; Veronica Shamovsky; Marissa Webber; Joel Weiser; Mark Williams; Guanming Wu; Lincoln Stein; Henning Hermjakob; Peter D'Eustachio
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.