Literature DB >> 33464436

Does contemporary ART lead to pre-eclampsia? A cohort study and meta-analysis.

Shlomit Kenigsberg1, Yaakov Bentov2,3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent publications suggested that the risk for pre-eclampsia (PE) is higher with frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) compared to fresh transfers (IVF-ETs). These studies were based on old data that reflects outdated practices. In this paper, we wanted to assess the incidence of PE in current assisted reproductive technology (ART) practice.
METHODS: In this cohort study, we present the incidence of PE in all births in the province of Ontario, Canada, for the years 2013-2017 for FET, IVF-ET, and natural conceptions (NC). We also compare our findings to previous studies in a meta-analysis that includes over 4 million births.
RESULTS: The results of our study show that contemporary practice of ART results in comparable risk for PE between FET and IVF-ET; however, the risk is higher than NC.
CONCLUSION: Current ART practice is associated with a lower risk for PE in frozen embryo transfer; this RR can be further attenuated by using ovulatory endometrial preparation for FETs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; Fresh embryo transfer; Frozen embryo transfer; Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; Natural conception; Pre-eclampsia

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464436      PMCID: PMC7910335          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02061-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  23 in total

1.  2008 Niday Perinatal Database quality audit: report of a quality assurance project.

Authors:  S Dunn; J Bottomley; A Ali; M Walker
Journal:  Chronic Dis Inj Can       Date:  2011-12

2.  Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?

Authors:  Tania B Huedo-Medina; Julio Sánchez-Meca; Fulgencio Marín-Martínez; Juan Botella
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2006-06

3.  Accuracy of competing-risks model in screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  N O'Gorman; D Wright; L C Poon; D L Rolnik; A Syngelaki; A Wright; R Akolekar; S Cicero; D Janga; J Jani; F S Molina; C de Paco Matallana; N Papantoniou; N Persico; W Plasencia; M Singh; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-14       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Cynthia Farquhar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Pasquale Patrizio; Giulia Scaravelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 6.  Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Shilpi Pandey; Edwin Amalraj Raja; Ashalatha Shetty; Mark Hamilton; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers.

Authors:  Wenhao Shi; Xia Xue; Silin Zhang; Wanqiu Zhao; Shan Liu; Hanying Zhou; Min Wang; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Obstetrical and perinatal morbidity and mortality among in-vitro fertilization pregnancies: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hussein Sabban; Andrew Zakhari; Valerie Patenaude; Togas Tulandi; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Akanksha Mehta; Dmitry M Kissin; Lee Warner; Jennifer F Kawwass; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Thor Haahr; Selmo Geber; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  1 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID-19 after medically assisted reproduction: results from the prospective COVID-19-Related Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcome Study.

Authors:  Yvonne Ziert; Michael Abou-Dakn; Clara Backes; Constanze Banz-Jansen; Nina Bock; Michael Bohlmann; Charlotte Engelbrecht; Teresa Mia Gruber; Antonella Iannaccone; Magdalena Jegen; Corinna Keil; Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Katharina Lang; Angela Lihs; Jula Manz; Christine Morfeld; Manuela Richter; Gregor Seliger; Marina Sourouni; Constantin Sylvius von Kaisenberg; Silke Wegener; Ulrich Pecks; Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 10.693

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.