Literature DB >> 33464364

Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An 'Evidence-Based Practice' review of the literature.

Daniel L Brennan1, Smaro Lazarakis2, Allan Lee1, Teng H Tan1, Kwang Y Chin1, Sheng F Oon3.   

Abstract

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate is increasingly used for the preoperative detection and staging of prostate cancer. Image quality of prostate mpMRI can be significantly degraded by motion related artefact due to bowel peristalsis and susceptibility related artefact, which reduces cancer detection sensitivity. The use of several different methods including anstispasmodic medications and rectal enemas were proposed as potential methods to reduce mpMRI artefacts, but current recommendations in the scientific literature are conflicting and inconsistent. This article seeks to identify the best available evidence to determine which patient preparation method is most effective in improving prostate mpMRI, and provides recommendations for further areas of research. We used the five-step 'Evidence-Based Practice' systematic approach of 'Ask, Search, Appraise, Apply and Evaluate' described by the McMaster University and National Health Service for critical appraisal of topics. We developed a focused clinical question using a PICO format, and performed a primary and secondary literature search through Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley). All identified articles were appraised for strength and validity. Seven articles were retrieved which demonstrated conflicting sensitivities and specificities for intravenous hyoscine butylbromide and rectal enema in improving image susceptibility artefact, motion artefact, and anatomic distortion on the T2 or diffusion weighted imaging sequences. Intravenous hysoscine butylbromide is the optimum patient preparation method for improving T2W and DWI image quality in prostate mpMRI. The use of a preparatory rectal enema is not currently recommended, but better quality studies are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; PIRADS; Prostate cancer; Radiology; Urology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464364     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02916-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  14 in total

1.  International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  Melissa M Center; Ahmedin Jemal; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Elizabeth Ward; Jacques Ferlay; Otis Brawley; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Marcel Oei; James S Babb; Benjamin E Niver; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Evidence-based Practice of Radiology.

Authors:  Lisa P Lavelle; Ruth M Dunne; Anne G Carroll; Dermot E Malone
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Does a cleansing enema improve image quality of 3T surface coil multiparametric prostate MRI?

Authors:  Christopher Lim; Jeff Quon; Matt McInnes; Wael M Shabana; Mohamed El-Khodary; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality.

Authors:  Iztok Caglic; Nienke L Hansen; Rhys A Slough; Andrew J Patterson; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Weinreb; Jelle O Barentsz; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Masoom A Haider; Katarzyna J Macura; Daniel Margolis; Mitchell D Schnall; Faina Shtern; Clare M Tempany; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadna Verma
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: Is administration of hyoscine-N-butyl-bromide mandatory?

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Timur H Kuru; Alexander Radbruch; Boris Hadaschik; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-28

Review 8.  Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success.

Authors:  I Caglic; T Barrett
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.350

9.  Hyoscine butylbromide significantly decreases motion artefacts and allows better delineation of anatomic structures in mp-MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  T Ullrich; M Quentin; A K Schmaltz; C Arsov; C Rubbert; D Blondin; R Rabenalt; P Albers; G Antoch; L Schimmöller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Masoom A Haider; Anwar R Padhani; Geert Villeirs; Katarzyna J Macura; Clare M Tempany; Peter L Choyke; Francois Cornud; Daniel J Margolis; Harriet C Thoeny; Sadhna Verma; Jelle Barentsz; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Abbreviated MR Protocols in Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 2.  Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Alex Kirkham; Shonit Punwani; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore; Clare Allen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.