Literature DB >> 33464183

Lack of Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Abandon or Repeat?

Shuling Chen1, Zhenwei Peng1, Yaojun Zhang1, Minshan Chen1, Jiaping Li1, Rongping Guo1, Jiali Li1, Bin Li1, Jie Mei1, Shiting Feng1, Ming Kuang1.   

Abstract

Background Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is unknown whether conventional TACE (cTACE) should be continued or abandoned after initial nonresponse for intermediate-stage HCC. The optimal number of sessions before abandoning cTACE remains debated. Purpose To define the number of sessions that patients who do not respond to treatment (hereafter, nonresponders, with stable disease [SD] or progressive disease [PD]) should undergo before abandoning cTACE. Materials and Methods Patients with intermediate-stage HCC and Child-Pugh A liver function who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions between January 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively included from three centers. Radiologic response rate to each session and its correlation with overall survival were evaluated. Response was assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A nomogram constructed by using tumor size, tumor capsule, and α-fetoprotein to predict patients who responded to treatment (hereafter, responders) was validated with sensitivity and specificity. Results This study evaluated 4154 patients (mean age, 58 years ± 6 [standard deviation]; 3777 men; primary cohort, 3442 patients [mean age, 58 years ± 6; 3129 men]; validation cohort, 712 patients [mean age, 58 years ± 7; 648 men]). Response rate to first cTACE was 35.6% (1227 of 3442, primary cohort) and 36.7% (261 of 712, validation cohort). For patients with SD who were nonresponders to first cTACE, the response rates after second cTACE were 46.1% (719 of 1560) and 48.4% (147 of 304); for patients with SD who were nonresponders to the second cTACE session, the response rates after the third cTACE session were 58.3% (591 of 1014) and 48.5% (98 of 202). For patients with SD who were nonresponders to third, fourth, and fifth cTACE sessions, response rates after fourth, fifth, and sixth cTACE sessions were less than 10%. All response rates in patients with PD who were nonresponders to the next cTACE were less than 5%. Responders to first, second, and third cTACE had higher 5-year overall survival than nonresponders (all P < .001) but responders to the fourth cTACE did not (P = .21). The sensitivity and specificity of a nomogram predicted responders to third cTACE: 75.0% and 79.4% (internal validation) and 78.6% and 87.0% (external validation), respectively. Conclusion Three sessions were recommended before abandoning conventional transarterial embolization (cTACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. The nomogram developed in this study identified responders to third cTACE. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33464183     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Sorafenib Versus Apatinib Both Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yanyan Cao; Tao Sun; Xiaopeng Guo; Tao Ouyang; Xuefeng Kan; Lei Chen; Bin Liang; Mingfu Wang; Chuansheng Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Real-time automatic prediction of treatment response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using deep learning based on digital subtraction angiography videos.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Yicheng Jiang; Zhe Jin; Wenting Jiang; Bin Zhang; Changmiao Wang; Lingeng Wu; Luyan Chen; Qiuying Chen; Shuyi Liu; Jingjing You; Xiaokai Mo; Jing Liu; Zhiyuan Xiong; Tao Huang; Liyang Yang; Xiang Wan; Ge Wen; Xiao Guang Han; Weijun Fan; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.605

3.  Gene Polymorphism of MUC15, MMP14, BRAF, and COL1A1 Is Associated with Capsule Formation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Yongchao Zhang; Bozhi Liu; Youjia Duan; Wei Li; Jinglong Chen
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Efficacy and Systemic Immune Response.

Authors:  Fei Yang; Gui-Li Xu; Jin-Tao Huang; Yu Yin; Wei Xiang; Bin-Yan Zhong; Wan-Ci Li; Jian Shen; Shuai Zhang; Jun Yang; Hong Peng Sun; Wan-Sheng Wang; Xiao-Li Zhu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  The efficacy of drug-eluting bead or conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

Authors:  Weihua Zhang; Linxia Wu; Lei Chen; Tao Sun; Yanqiao Ren; Bo Sun; Licheng Zhu; Ping Han; Chuansheng Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Three-Dimensional Quantitative Tumor Response and Survival Analysis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Who Failed Initial Transarterial Chemoembolization: Repeat or Switch Treatment?

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Reham R Haroun; Sonia Sahu; Ruediger E Schernthaner; Susanne Smolka; Ming-De Lin; Kelvin K Hong; Christos Georgiades; Rafael Duran
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  Transarterial chemoembolization failure/refractoriness: A scientific concept or pseudo-proposition.

Authors:  Shen Zhang; Bin-Yan Zhong; Lei Zhang; Wan-Sheng Wang; Cai-Fang Ni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 8.  Intraarterial Therapies for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tushar Garg; Apurva Shrigiriwar; Peiman Habibollahi; Mircea Cristescu; Robert P Liddell; Julius Chapiro; Peter Inglis; Juan C Camacho; Nariman Nezami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Effects of Early TACE Refractoriness on Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Real-World Study.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Yin-Gen Luo; Hong-Cai Yang; Zhi-Hang Yao; Xiao Li
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-07-21

10.  Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting microspheres chemoembolization under cone beam computed tomography control in patients with early and intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Spela Korsic; Nastja Levasic; Rok Dezman; Lara Anja Lesnik Zupan; Blaz Trotovsek; Rado Jansa; Alojz Smid; Peter Popovic
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.