| Literature DB >> 33463873 |
Sahar Moghimi1,2,3, Azadeh Shadkam1, Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh3,4, Olivia Calipe3, Marine Panzani3, Mohammadreza Edalati1,3, Maryam Ghorbani1,2, Laura Routier3,4, Fabrice Wallois3,4.
Abstract
Temporal theta slow-wave activity (TTA-SW) in premature infants is a specific neurobiomarker of the early neurodevelopment of perisylvian networks observed as early as 24 weeks of gestational age (wGA). It is present at the turning point between non-sensory driven spontaneous networks and cortical network functioning. Despite its clinical importance, the underlying mechanisms responsible for this spontaneous nested activity and its functional role have not yet been determined. The coupling between neural oscillations at different timescales is a key feature of ongoing neural activity, the characteristics of which are determined by the network structure and dynamics. The underlying mechanisms of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) are associated with several putative functions in adults. In order to show that this generic mechanism is already in place early in the course of development, we analyzed electroencephalography recordings from sleeping preterm newborns (24-27 wGA). Employing cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling analyses, we found that TTAs were orchestrated by the SWs defined by a precise temporal relationship. Notably, TTAs were synchronized to the SW trough, and were suppressed during the SW peak. Spontaneous endogenous TTA-SWs constitute one of the very early signatures of the developing temporal neural networks with key functions, such as language and communication. The presence of a fine-tuned relationship between the slow activity and the TTA in premature neonates emphasizes the complexity and relative maturity of the intimate mechanisms that shape the CFC, the disruption of which can have severe neurodevelopmental consequences.Entities:
Keywords: endogenous activities; neurodevelopment; perisylvian area; phase amplitude coupling; premature; spontaneous generators
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33463873 PMCID: PMC7555093 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
FIGURE 1EEG recorded in a premature infant (age 25 wGA; band‐pass filter: 0.5–20 Hz). A TTA‐SW event is clearly seen over FP1‐T3 and T3‐O1
FIGURE 2Event‐locked analysis of SW‐TTA relationship. (a) Grand average of SW trough‐locked TFR (zero at SW trough). The bottom panel shows the TFR power averaged over the theta range (4–7.5 Hz). (b) Average of TTA locked TFR (zero at the largest trough of TTA). In panels (a) and (b), the statistically significant change from the pre‐event baseline (−5 to −3 s, p < .01, cluster‐corrected) is indicated with a white contour. (c) Normalized histogram of the preferred modulation phase of SW to TTA pooled over all newborns. The average phase is indicated by a red line. (d) The unit circle of preferred phases of SW to TTA modulation in each newborn. The Rayleigh test for non‐uniformity was significant (p < .05) for all subjects. The preferred phases of SW to TTA modulation clustered significantly around the trough of SW across neonates, as shown by the red line (V = 26.56, p < .001, average preferred phase = 175.21°). (e) Grand average 0.5–20 Hz EEG trace across neonates, aligned to the largest TTA trough (trough, time 0). Intervals whose amplitude differed significantly from baseline (−5 to −3 s) are shaded (p < .01, corrected). The green arrow marks the location of the “blup.” (f) Grand average, 0.5–20 Hz EEG time‐locked to the first filtered positive theta peak. Blue and black lines indicate the top and bottom quartiles, respectively. The red arrow shows that specifically in the top quartile the first peak of the TTA is at the onset of the SW
FIGURE 3Event‐related histograms (normalized for the total number of counts) showing the timing of the beginning of TTA events in relation with the trough of the SW (t = 0) (a), the timing of the largest trough of the TTA events (b), and the timing of the end of TTA events (c). The data in the bins are quoted as the mean ± SE. The red line indicates the mean ± SE for the randomized condition. The results of subject‐level statistical analysis are shaded (p < .05, corrected)
FIGURE 4Phase–amplitude coupling for TTA‐SW events. A single cluster showed a significant modulation index when comparing the original data with the epoch‐shuffled surrogate data (p < .01 in a two‐tailed, paired‐samples t test, and with a modulation index greater than the 90th percentile). The inset shows the probability distribution of average amplitudes of the modulated high‐frequency as the function of the phase of the modulating low frequency