| Literature DB >> 33463569 |
Madhumita Gopal1, Muralidhar Ramappa2, Ashik Mohamed3, Rohit Dhakal1, Sunita Chaurasia2.
Abstract
Purpose: Congenital corneal anesthesia (CCA) is a rare clinical entity that poses a diagnostic dilemma, particularly in the pediatric age group with very little literature on this. Accurate initial diagnosis, evaluation, early identification of risk factors, aggressive systemic workup, and appropriate therapy are paramount to prevent visual loss due to long-term complications of corneal anesthesia. The purpose of the study was to estimate and compare the corneal neural architecture using real time, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in patients with CCA as against a control population.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital Corneal Anesthesia; congenital insensitivity to pain; in vivo confocal microscopy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33463569 PMCID: PMC7933903 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1252_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1(a-d) They represent corneal neural images of subbasal plexus in children with congenital corneal anesthesia (CCA) with low nerve density. (a) Image of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus showing extremely delicate nerve fibers with an absence of typical branching and beading. (b) Image of the corneal subbasal nerves plexus was showing fragile and sparse nerves. (c) Image of the corneal subbasal nerves showing delicate parallelly running nerves with the absence of branching and beading. (d) Highlight the lack of typical dichotomous branching throughout the course of the nerve. Images were 400 × 400 μm
Figure 2(a-c) They illustrate corneal neural images of the control arm consist of healthy relatives siblings of CCA subjects showing normal nerve density. (a) Image of the corneal subbasal nerves in a healthy subject showing typical branching. (b) Image of the corneal subbasal nerves with a typical nerve tortuosity and presence of beads. (c) Parallelly running nerve fibers are much thicker, longer, tortuous in course, and denser in comparison to CCA cases. Images were 400 × 400 μm
Demographics, clinical features, type of neuropathy, corneal status and final visual functions after tarsorrhaphy
| Laterality | Age | Gender/yrs | Eye | Location | Type of HSAN | Corneal status | Sensation | Staining pattern* | Schirmer’s in mm/5 min | Tarsorrhaphy | Vision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bilateral | 9 | M | OD | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 12 | 2/3rd width | 0.20 |
| Bilateral | OS | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 9 | 2/3rd width | 0.40 | ||||
| Bilateral | 7 | F | OD | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 10 | 2/3rd width | 0.30 |
| Bilateral | OS | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 10 | 2/3rd width | 0.30 | ||||
| Bilateral | 12 | M | OD | Generalised | 3 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 7 | 2/3rd width | 0.70 |
| Bilateral | 13 | M | OS | Generalised | 3 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 5 | 2/3rd width | 0.40 |
| Bilateral | 14 | F | OD | Generalised | 3 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 5 | 2/3rd width | 1.10 |
| Unilateral | 8 | M | OD | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 13 | 2/3rd width | 2.00 |
| Bilateral | 10 | F | OD | Generalised | 4 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 6 | 2/3rd width | 0.40 |
| Bilateral | OS | Generalised | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 3 | 2/3rd width | 0.40 | |||
| Bilateral | 21 | M | OD | Trigeminal | 4 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 4 | 2/3rd width | 1.00 |
| Bilateral | OS | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 5 | 2/3rd width | 0.70 | ||||
| Unilateral | 11 | F | OS | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 14 | 2/3rd width | NA |
| Unilateral | 12 | M | OD | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 10 | 2/3rd width | 1.40 |
| Bilateral | 14 | F | OD | Generalised | 3 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 9 | 2/3rd width | 0.30 |
| Bilateral | OS | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 11 | 2/3rd width | 0.20 | ||||
| Bilateral | 13 | F | OD | Generalised | 4 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 7 | 2/3rd width | NA |
| Bilateral | OS | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 5 | 2/3rd width | NA | ||||
| Unilateral | 13 | F | OS | Trigeminal | 2 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 11 | 2/3rd width | 0.70 |
| Bilateral | 13 | F | OD | Generalised | 3 | NM scar | Absent | No epithelial defect | 8 | 2/3rd width | NA |
HSAN: Hereditary somatic autonomic neuropathy; Type-1: sensory radiculopathy, Type-2: Congenital sensory neuropathy, Type-3: Riley Day Syndrome, Type-4: Congenital Insensitivity to pain and anhidrosis (CIPA) and Type-5: CIPA with a partial anhidrosis; NM scarring: Nebulo-macular grade scarring, *Most cases had a mild to severe superficial punctate epithelial erosions.
Demographic and clinical information between two groups
| Parameter | Cases | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 11 | 10 |
| Number of eyes | 15 | 20 |
| Male: Female proportion | 4:7 | 9:1 |
| Age in years | 12.8±3.55 | 29.22±10.03 |
| BCVA in Log MAR | 0.75±0.63 | 0.00 |
| Corneal sensation present percentage | 0% | 100% |
| Schirmer’s values in mm | 15.6 | 25.7±4 |
Corneal neural architecture by in vivo confocal microscopy
| Characteristic | Cases | Controls | Test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (μm), mean±SD | 314.35±210.43 | 472.51±406.09 | 0.28 | |
| Thickness (μm), mean±SD | 3.00±0.36 | 2.88±0.34 | 0.45 | |
| Density in mm/mm2 mean±SD | 3.85±1.38 | 6.74±1.75 | 0.0005 |
Neural architecture pattern
| Characteristic | Cases | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of beading | |||
| Median | 100% | 100% | 0.97 |
| IQR | 40%-100% | 80%-100% | |
| Dichotomous pattern | |||
| Median | 40% | 81.75% | 0.07 |
| IQR | 0%-70% | 80%-100% |
Figure 3Box plot displaying differences in the corneal neural architectural parameters between case and control groups