Literature DB >> 33463126

Procalcitonin Has Good Accuracy for Prognosis of Critical Condition and Mortality in COVID-19: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Mohammad Erfan Zare1, Yanzhong Wang2, Atefeh Nasir Kansestani3, Afshin Almasi4, Jun Zhang5.   

Abstract

Several reports have determined that changes in white blood cell counts and inflammatory biomarkers are related to disease outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and they can be utilized as prognostic biomarkers. For introducing a factor as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker, diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic review and meta-analysis are recommended. For the first time, we aimed to determine the accuracies of white blood cell counts and inflammatory biomarkers for prognosis of COVID-19 patient's outcome by a DTA meta-analysis. Until August24, 2020, we searched Web of Sciences, Scopus, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases to achieve related papers. Summary points and lines of included studies were calculated from 2×2 tables by bivariate/hierarchical models. Critical condition and mortality were considered as outcomes. A total of 13387 patients from 28 studies were included in this study. Six biomarkers containing leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, increased level of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), and ferritin met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the area under the curve (AUCHSROC) indicated that the PCT was the only applicable prognostic biomarker for critical condition and mortality (AUCHSROC=0.80 for both conditions). Pooled-diagnostic odds ratios were 6.78 (95% CI, 3.65-12.61) for prognosis of critical condition and 13.21 (95% CI, 3.95-44.19) for mortality. Other biomarkers had insufficient accuracies for both conditions (AUCHSROC< 0.80). Among evaluated biomarkers, only PCT has good accuracy for the prognosis of both critical condition and mortality in COVID-19 and it can be considered as a single prognostic biomarker for poor outcomes. Also, PCT has more accuracy for the prognosis of mortality in comparison to critical condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Procalcitonin; Prognosis; Sensitivity and specificity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33463126     DOI: 10.18502/ijaai.v19i6.4926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1735-1502            Impact factor:   1.464


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic Accuracy of Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers in Patients with COVID-19: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Atefeh Nasir Kansestani; Mohammad Erfan Zare; Jun Zhang
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2021-01

2.  Role of procalcitonin as a predictor of clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Ian Jackson; Hadi Jaradeh; Sarah Aurit; Ali Aldamen; Shraddha Narechania; Christopher Destache; Manasa Velagapudi
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 12.074

3.  COVID-19 Severity and Mortality in Two Pandemic Waves in Poland and Predictors of Poor Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hospitalized Young Adults.

Authors:  Laura Ziuzia-Januszewska; Marcin Januszewski; Joanna Sosnowska-Nowak; Mariusz Janiszewski; Paweł Dobrzyński; Alicja A Jakimiuk; Artur J Jakimiuk
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 5.818

4.  Procalcitonin as a predictive marker in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Era Karn; Kiran Trivedi; Pramod Kumar; Ganesh Chauhan; Aradhana Kumari; Pragya Pant; Murali Munisamy; Jay Prakash; Prattay Guha Sarkar; Kameshwar Prasad; Anupa Prasad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.