Joseph Seemiller1, Gérard N Bischof2, Merle C Hoenig2,3, Masoud Tahmasian4, Thilo van Eimeren2,5,6, Alexander Drzezga2,3,6. 1. Department of Neurology, Geisinger Medical Center, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. joe@josephseemiller.com. 2. Multimodal Neuroimaging Group, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany. 3. Molecular Organization of the Brain, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 2, Research Center Juelich, Jülich, 52428, Germany. 4. Institute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany. 6. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn/Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Tau pathology progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is explained through the network degeneration hypothesis and the neuropathological Braak stages; however, the compatibility of these models remains unclear. METHODS: We utilized [18F]AV-1451 tau-PET scans of 39 subjects with AD and 39 sex-matched amyloid-negative healthy controls (HC) in the ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) dataset. The peak cluster of tau-tracer uptake was identified in each Braak stage of neuropathological tau deposition and used to create a seed-based functional connectivity network (FCN) using 198 HC subjects, to identify healthy networks unaffected by neurodegeneration. RESULTS: Voxel-wise tau deposition was both significantly higher inside relative to outside FCNs and correlated significantly and positively with levels of healthy functional connectivity. Within many isolated Braak stages and regions, the correlation between tau and intrinsic functional connectivity was significantly stronger than it was across the whole brain. In this way, each peak cluster of tau was related to multiple Braak stages traditionally associated with both earlier and later stages of disease. CONCLUSION: We show specificity of healthy FCN topography for AD-pathological tau as well as positive voxel-by-voxel correlations between pathological tau and healthy functional connectivity. We propose a model of "up- and downstream" functional tau progression, suggesting that tau pathology evolves along functional connectivity networks not only "downstream" (i.e., along the expected sequence of the established Braak stages) but also in part "upstream" or "retrograde" (i.e., against the expected sequence of the established Braak stages), with pathology in earlier Braak stages intensified by its functional relationship to later disease stages.
PURPOSE: Tau pathology progression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is explained through the network degeneration hypothesis and the neuropathological Braak stages; however, the compatibility of these models remains unclear. METHODS: We utilized [18F]AV-1451 tau-PET scans of 39 subjects with AD and 39 sex-matched amyloid-negative healthy controls (HC) in the ADNI (Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) dataset. The peak cluster of tau-tracer uptake was identified in each Braak stage of neuropathological tau deposition and used to create a seed-based functional connectivity network (FCN) using 198 HC subjects, to identify healthy networks unaffected by neurodegeneration. RESULTS: Voxel-wise tau deposition was both significantly higher inside relative to outside FCNs and correlated significantly and positively with levels of healthy functional connectivity. Within many isolated Braak stages and regions, the correlation between tau and intrinsic functional connectivity was significantly stronger than it was across the whole brain. In this way, each peak cluster of tau was related to multiple Braak stages traditionally associated with both earlier and later stages of disease. CONCLUSION: We show specificity of healthy FCN topography for AD-pathological tau as well as positive voxel-by-voxel correlations between pathological tau and healthy functional connectivity. We propose a model of "up- and downstream" functional tau progression, suggesting that tau pathology evolves along functional connectivity networks not only "downstream" (i.e., along the expected sequence of the established Braak stages) but also in part "upstream" or "retrograde" (i.e., against the expected sequence of the established Braak stages), with pathology in earlier Braak stages intensified by its functional relationship to later disease stages.
Authors: Masoud Tahmasian; Lorenzo Pasquini; Martin Scherr; Chun Meng; Stefan Förster; Satja Mulej Bratec; Kuangyu Shi; Igor Yakushev; Markus Schwaiger; Timo Grimmer; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Valentin Riedl; Christian Sorg; Alexander Drzezga Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Nicolai Franzmeier; Anna Rubinski; Julia Neitzel; Yeshin Kim; Alexander Damm; Duk L Na; Hee Jin Kim; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Hana Cho; Sofia Finsterwalder; Marco Duering; Sang Won Seo; Michael Ewers Journal: Brain Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: William W Seeley; Danielle A Carlin; John M Allman; Marcelo N Macedo; Clarissa Bush; Bruce L Miller; Stephen J Dearmond Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Randy L Buckner; Abraham Z Snyder; Benjamin J Shannon; Gina LaRossa; Rimmon Sachs; Anthony F Fotenos; Yvette I Sheline; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; John C Morris; Mark A Mintun Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: David T Jones; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Val J Lowe; Heather J Wiste; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Hugo Botha; Kejal Kantarci; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Cortex Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Jessica W Wu; Mathieu Herman; Li Liu; Sabrina Simoes; Christopher M Acker; Helen Figueroa; Joshua I Steinberg; Martin Margittai; Rakez Kayed; Chiara Zurzolo; Gilbert Di Paolo; Karen E Duff Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Masoud Tahmasian; Junming Shao; Chun Meng; Timo Grimmer; Janine Diehl-Schmid; Behrooz H Yousefi; Stefan Förster; Valentin Riedl; Alexander Drzezga; Christian Sorg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Thomas E Cope; Timothy Rittman; Robin J Borchert; P Simon Jones; Deniz Vatansever; Kieren Allinson; Luca Passamonti; Patricia Vazquez Rodriguez; W Richard Bevan-Jones; John T O'Brien; James B Rowe Journal: Brain Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Negin Holland; Maura Malpetti; Timothy Rittman; Elijah E Mak; Luca Passamonti; Sanne S Kaalund; Frank H Hezemans; P Simon Jones; George Savulich; Young T Hong; Tim D Fryer; Franklin I Aigbirhio; John T O'Brien; James B Rowe Journal: Brain Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 15.255