Literature DB >> 33462601

Anomalous Phylogenetic Behavior of Ribosomal Proteins in Metagenome-Assembled Asgard Archaea.

Sriram G Garg1, Nils Kapust1, Weili Lin2, Michael Knopp1, Fernando D K Tria1, Shijulal Nelson-Sathi3, Sven B Gould1, Lu Fan4,5,6, Ruixin Zhu2, Chuanlun Zhang4,5,7, William F Martin1.   

Abstract

Metagenomic studies permit the exploration of microbial diversity in a defined habitat, and binning procedures enable phylogenomic analyses, taxon description, and even phenotypic characterizations in the absence of morphological evidence. Such lineages include asgard archaea, which were initially reported to represent archaea with eukaryotic cell complexity, although the first images of such an archaeon show simple cells with prokaryotic characteristics. However, these metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) might suffer from data quality problems not encountered in sequences from cultured organisms due to two common analytical procedures of bioinformatics: assembly of metagenomic sequences and binning of assembled sequences on the basis of innate sequence properties and abundance across samples. Consequently, genomic sequences of distantly related taxa, or domains, can in principle be assigned to the same MAG and result in chimeric sequences. The impacts of low-quality or chimeric MAGs on phylogenomic and metabolic prediction remain unknown. Debates that asgard archaeal data are contaminated with eukaryotic sequences are overshadowed by the lack of evidence indicating that individual asgard MAGs stem from the same chromosome. Here, we show that universal proteins including ribosomal proteins of asgard archaeal MAGs fail to meet the basic phylogenetic criterion fulfilled by genome sequences of cultured archaea investigated to date: These proteins do not share common evolutionary histories to the same extent as pure culture genomes do, pointing to a chimeric nature of asgard archaeal MAGs. Our analysis suggests that some asgard archaeal MAGs represent unnatural constructs, genome-like patchworks of genes resulting from assembly and/or the binning process.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asgard archaea; binning; candidate phylum radiation (CPR); eukaryogenesis; metagenomics; phylogenetics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33462601      PMCID: PMC7813640          DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol Evol        ISSN: 1759-6653            Impact factor:   3.416


  50 in total

1.  Defining the core of nontransferable prokaryotic genes: the euryarchaeal core.

Authors:  C L Nesbø; Y Boucher; W F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  David Bryant; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Heads or tails: a simple reliability check for multiple sequence alignments.

Authors:  Giddy Landan; Dan Graur
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Jose Castresana
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16S rRNA gene sequences related to beta-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria.

Authors:  J R Stephen; A E McCaig; Z Smith; J I Prosser; T M Embley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.

Authors:  William F Martin; Aloysius G M Tielens; Marek Mentel; Sriram G Garg; Sven B Gould
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 7.  Bacterial Vesicle Secretion and the Evolutionary Origin of the Eukaryotic Endomembrane System.

Authors:  Sven B Gould; Sriram G Garg; William F Martin
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  A new view of the tree of life.

Authors:  Laura A Hug; Brett J Baker; Karthik Anantharaman; Christopher T Brown; Alexander J Probst; Cindy J Castelle; Cristina N Butterfield; Alex W Hernsdorf; Yuki Amano; Kotaro Ise; Yohey Suzuki; Natasha Dudek; David A Relman; Kari M Finstad; Ronald Amundson; Brian C Thomas; Jillian F Banfield
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 17.745

9.  BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments.

Authors:  Alexis Criscuolo; Simonetta Gribaldo
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote-eukaryote interface.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Imachi; Masaru K Nobu; Nozomi Nakahara; Yuki Morono; Miyuki Ogawara; Yoshihiro Takaki; Yoshinori Takano; Katsuyuki Uematsu; Tetsuro Ikuta; Motoo Ito; Yohei Matsui; Masayuki Miyazaki; Kazuyoshi Murata; Yumi Saito; Sanae Sakai; Chihong Song; Eiji Tasumi; Yuko Yamanaka; Takashi Yamaguchi; Yoichi Kamagata; Hideyuki Tamaki; Ken Takai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  8 in total

1.  Progress and Challenges in Studying the Ecophysiology of Archaea.

Authors:  Panagiotis S Adam; Till L V Bornemann; Alexander J Probst
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Ancestral State Reconstructions Trace Mitochondria But Not Phagocytosis to the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor.

Authors:  Nico Bremer; Fernando D K Tria; Josip Skejo; Sriram G Garg; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.065

3.  Metagenome-assembled genomes: concepts, analogies, and challenges.

Authors:  João C Setubal
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-04

4.  The Asgard Archaeal-Unique Contribution to Protein Families of the Eukaryotic Common Ancestor Was 0.3.

Authors:  Michael Knopp; Simon Stockhorst; Mark van der Giezen; Sriram G Garg; Sven B Gould
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Evolving Perspective on the Origin and Diversification of Cellular Life and the Virosphere.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Tara A Mahendrarajah; Pierre Offre; Courtney W Stairs
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.065

6.  The metabolic network of the last bacterial common ancestor.

Authors:  Joana C Xavier; Rebecca E Gerhards; Jessica L E Wimmer; Julia Brueckner; Fernando D K Tria; William F Martin
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-26

7.  Editorial: Ecology, Metabolism and Evolution of Archaea-Perspectives From Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geo-Omics of Archaea.

Authors:  Brian P Hedlund; Chuanlun Zhang; Fengping Wang; Christian Rinke; William F Martin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Gene Duplications Are At Least 50 Times Less Frequent than Gene Transfers in Prokaryotic Genomes.

Authors:  Fernando D K Tria; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.