Literature DB >> 33462450

Durvalumab compared to maintenance chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: the randomized phase II SAFIR02-BREAST IMMUNO trial.

Thomas Bachelot1, Thomas Filleron2, Ivan Bieche3, Monica Arnedos4, Mario Campone5, Florence Dalenc6, Florence Coussy7, Marie-Paule Sablin7, Marc Debled8, Claudia Lefeuvre-Plesse9, Anthony Goncalves10, Marie-Ange Mouret Reynier11, William Jacot12, Benoit You13,14, Philippe Barthelemy15,16, Benjamin Verret4, Nicolas Isambert17, Xavier Tchiknavorian18, Christelle Levy19, Jean-Christophe Thery20, Tifenn L'Haridon21, Jean-Marc Ferrero22, Alice Mege23, Francesco Del Piano24, Etienne Rouleau25, Alicia Tran-Dien26,27, Julien Adam28,29, Amelie Lusque2, Marta Jimenez30, Alexandra Jacquet30, Ingrid Garberis26,27, Fabrice Andre31,32,33.   

Abstract

The impact of single-agent antibodies against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as maintenance therapy is unknown in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The SAFIR02-BREAST IMMUNO substudy included patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (Her2)-negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease did not progress after six to eight cycles of chemotherapy. Patients (n = 199) were randomized to either durvalumab (10 mg kg-1 every 2 weeks) or maintenance chemotherapy. In the overall population, durvalumab did not improve progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.96; P = 0.047) or overall survival (OS; adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.54-1.29; P = 0.423). In an exploratory subgroup analysis, durvalumab improved OS in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 82; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30-0.97, P = 0.0377). Exploratory analysis showed that the HR of death was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.12-1.13) for patients with PD-L1+ TNBC (n = 32) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.18-1.34) for those with PD-L1- TNBC (n = 29). In patients with TNBC, exploratory analyses showed that the HR for durvalumab efficacy (OS) was 0.18 (95% CI: 0.05-0.71; log-rank test, P = 0.0059) in patients with CD274 gain/amplification (n = 23) and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.42-2.99; log-rank test, P = 0.8139) in patients with CD274 normal/loss (n = 32). Tumor infiltration by lymphocytes (CD8, FoxP3 and CD103 expressions) and homologous recombination deficiency did not predict sensitivity to durvalumab in exploratory analyses. This latter finding should be interpreted with caution since only one patient presented a germline BRCA mutation. The present study provides a rationale to evaluate single-agent durvalumab in maintenance therapy in patients with TNBC. Exploratory analyses identified CD274 amplification as a potential biomarker of sensitivity. Maintenance chemotherapy was more effective than durvalumab in patients with hormone receptor-positive and Her2-negative disease.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33462450     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-01189-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  17 in total

1.  A single-cell map of intratumoral changes during anti-PD1 treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ayse Bassez; Hanne Vos; Laurien Van Dyck; Giuseppe Floris; Ingrid Arijs; Christine Desmedt; Bram Boeckx; Marlies Vanden Bempt; Ines Nevelsteen; Kathleen Lambein; Kevin Punie; Patrick Neven; Abhishek D Garg; Hans Wildiers; Junbin Qian; Ann Smeets; Diether Lambrechts
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Precision medicine improves outcomes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1, Anti-CTLA-4 and Their Combined Immunotherapy in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ze Xiang; Jiayuan Li; Zhengyu Zhang; Chao Cen; Wei Chen; Bin Jiang; Yiling Meng; Ying Wang; Björn Berglund; Guanghua Zhai; Jian Wu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 4.  Clinical trial data and emerging immunotherapeutic strategies: hormone receptor-positive, HER2- negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Kearney; Julia E McGuinness; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chaoyang Wang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 6.  Clinical Progress of PD-1/L1 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Naifei Chen; Yangyang Gao; Lin Jia; Zheng Lyu; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Comparative Analysis of Predictive Biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Cancers: Developments and Challenges.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Jacqueline F Wang; Yucai Wang; Baorui Liu; Julian R Molina
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qiao Ji; Jingxian Ding; Meiqi Hao; Nachuan Luo; Jiabing Huang; Wenxiong Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Pathological Remission of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Bing Jiang; Qian Liu; Junda Gai; Jingqian Guan; Qingchang Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Immunotherapy for early triple negative breast cancer: research agenda for the next decade.

Authors:  Paolo Tarantino; Chiara Corti; Peter Schmid; Javier Cortes; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Hope Rugo; Sara M Tolaney; Giampaolo Bianchini; Fabrice Andrè; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.