Literature DB >> 33461777

Perceptions and understanding about mesh and hernia surgery: What do patients really think?

Sharbel A Elhage1, Otto N Thielen1, Javier Otero1, Andrew T Huber1, Taylor M Grigg1, Caleb E Suddreth1, George A Monjimbo1, Tanushree Prasad1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical mesh and hernia repair have come under increasing scrutiny with large amounts of press, Internet, and social media reportage regarding ongoing mesh litigation, recalls, and patient testimonials. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient perceptions of mesh in hernia surgery.
METHODS: A 16-question survey was given to patients presenting for hernia surgery at a tertiary hernia center by trained data analysts before surgeon interaction.
RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients were surveyed. Patients believed mesh caused complications (45.1%) and reported concerns about mesh (38.2%). Those who performed their own research, females, and patients with recurrent hernias were more likely to have concerns about mesh (P ≤ 0.03). Most patients (81.7%) thought they were at average risk or less for complications; patients with recurrent hernias (versus primary hernias) and incisional hernias (compared with inguinal or umbilical hernias) had more negative outlooks on complications (all P < .05). Recovery expectations varied, but the failed repair and incisional hernia groups were more likely to expect prolonged recovery (>3 months) (all P < .05). After surgeon-directed education and a mesh education handout, all but one patient agreed to and underwent a mesh repair as indicated.
CONCLUSION: Patients had concerns about mesh and were aware of mesh related complications. Patients performing their own research, as well as females and recurrent hernia patients, had worse perceptions of mesh. Recurrent and incisional hernia patients had greater concerns about complications, recurrence, and recovery. Preoperative education concerning mesh and mesh choice for each operation eased patient anxiety.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33461777     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  2 in total

1.  Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.

Authors:  S Docimo; K Seeras; R Acho; A Pryor; K Spaniolas
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Internet search by the patients undergoing hernia surgery about the disease and surgeon selection.

Authors:  C Ugurlu; H Celasin; B Bayar; H Kulacoglu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.920

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.