Literature DB >> 33461579

Clip placement to prevent delayed bleeding after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (CLIPPER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Ayla S Turan1, Leon M G Moons2, Ramon-Michel Schreuder3, Erik J Schoon3, Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste4, Ruud W M Schrauwen5, Jan Willem Straathof6, Barbara A J Bastiaansen7, Matthijs P Schwartz8, Wouter L Hazen9, Alaa Alkhalaf10, Daud Allajar11, Muhammed Hadithi12, Bas W van der Spek13, Dimitri G D N Heine13, Adriaan C I T L Tan14, Wilmar de Graaf15, Jurjen J Boonstra16, Fia J Voogd17, Robert Roomer18, Rogier J J de Ridder19, Wietske Kievit20, Peter D Siersema21, Paul Didden2, Erwin J M van Geenen21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for large colorectal polyps is in most cases the preferred treatment to prevent progression to colorectal carcinoma. The most common complication after EMR is delayed bleeding, occurring in 7% overall and in approximately 10% of polyps ≥ 2 cm in the proximal colon. Previous research has suggested that prophylactic clipping of the mucosal defect after EMR may reduce the incidence of delayed bleeding in polyps with a high bleeding risk.
METHODS: The CLIPPER trial is a multicenter, parallel-group, single blinded, randomized controlled superiority study. A total of 356 patients undergoing EMR for large (≥ 2 cm) non-pedunculated polyps in the proximal colon will be included and randomized to the clip group or the control group. Prophylactic clipping will be performed in the intervention group to close the resection defect after the EMR with a distance of < 1 cm between the clips. Primary outcome is delayed bleeding within 30 days after EMR. Secondary outcomes are recurrent or residual polyps and clip artifacts during surveillance colonoscopy after 6 months, as well as cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping and severity of delayed bleeding. DISCUSSION: The CLIPPER trial is a pragmatic study performed in the Netherlands and is powered to determine the real-time efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic clipping after EMR of proximal colon polyps ≥ 2 cm in the Netherlands. This study will also generate new data on the achievability of complete closure and the effects of clip placement on scar surveillance after EMR, in order to further promote the debate on the role of prophylactic clipping in everyday clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03309683 . Registered on 13 October 2017. Start recruitment: 05 March 2018. Planned completion of recruitment: 31 August 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clip artifact; Colonic polyp; Delayed bleeding; EMR; Prophylactic clipping

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33461579      PMCID: PMC7813164          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04996-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  31 in total

1.  Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Marc A Koopmanschap; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps.

Authors:  Farzan F Bahin; Mahendra Naidoo; Stephen J Williams; Luke F Hourigan; Donald G Ormonde; Spiro C Raftopoulos; Bronte A Holt; Rebecca Sonson; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Hemoclipping for postpolypectomy and postbiopsy colonic bleeding.

Authors:  A Parra-Blanco; N Kaminaga; T Kojima; Y Endo; N Uragami; N Okawa; T Hattori; H Takahashi; R Fujita
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states.

Authors:  P Dolan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Location in the right hemi-colon is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a multi-center case-control study.

Authors:  K Tim Buddingh; Thomas Herngreen; Jelle Haringsma; Wil C van der Zwet; Frank P Vleggaar; Ronald Breumelhof; Frank Ter Borg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Prophylactic clip application does not decrease delayed bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Shioji; Yutaka Suzuki; Masaaki Kobayashi; Atsuo Nakamura; Masaki Azumaya; Manabu Takeuchi; Youichiro Baba; Terasu Honma; Rintaro Narisawa
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions.

Authors:  Nicholas G Burgess; Andrew J Metz; Stephen J Williams; Rajvinder Singh; William Tam; Luke F Hourigan; Simon A Zanati; Gregor J Brown; Rebecca Sonson; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions.

Authors:  Hammad Liaquat; Elizabeth Rohn; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  A randomized study on the effectiveness of prophylactic clipping during endoscopic resection of colon polyps for the prevention of delayed bleeding.

Authors:  Tatsuya Dokoshi; Mikihiro Fujiya; Kazuyuki Tanaka; Aki Sakatani; Yuhei Inaba; Nobuhiro Ueno; Shin Kashima; Takuma Goto; Junpei Sasajima; Motoya Tominaga; Takahiro Ito; Kentaro Moriichi; Hiroki Tanabe; Katsuya Ikuta; Takaaki Ohtake; Yutaka Kohgo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopic Screening with Ketamine-based Sedation: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Mirza Kovacevic; Nermina Rizvanovic; Adisa Sabanovic Adilovic; Nedim Barucija; Anida Abazovic
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2022-03-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.