Literature DB >> 33461104

Calculating LRs for presence of body fluids from mRNA assay data in mixtures.

R J F Ypma1, P A Maaskant-van Wijk2, R Gill3, M Sjerps4, M van den Berge2.   

Abstract

Messenger RNA (mRNA) profiling can identify body fluids present in a stain, yielding information on what activities could have taken place at a crime scene. To account for uncertainty in such identifications, recent work has focused on devising statistical models to allow for probabilistic statements on the presence of body fluids. A major hurdle for practical adoption is that evidentiary stains are likely to contain more than one body fluid and current models are ill-suited to analyse such mixtures. Here, we construct a likelihood ratio (LR) system that can handle mixtures, considering the hypotheses H1: the sample contains at least one of the body fluids of interest (and possibly other body fluids); H2: the sample contains none of the body fluids of interest (but possibly other body fluids). Thus, the LR-system outputs an LR-value for any combination of mRNA profile and set of body fluids of interest that are given as input. The calculation is based on an augmented dataset obtained by in silico mixing of real single body fluid mRNA profiles. These digital mixtures are used to construct a probabilistic classification method (a 'multi-label classifier'). The probabilities produced are subsequently used to calculate an LR, via calibration. We test a range of different classification methods from the field of machine learning, ways to preprocess the data and multi-label strategies for their performance on in silico mixed test data. Furthermore, we study their robustness to different assumptions on background levels of the body fluids. We find logistic regression works as well as more flexible classifiers, but shows higher robustness and better explainability. We test the system's performance on lab-generated mixture samples, and discuss practical usage in case work.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body fluid typing; Calibration; LR system; Machine learning; mRNA profile

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33461104     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  5 in total

1.  A strawman with machine learning for a brain: A response to Biedermann (2022) the strange persistence of (source) "identification" claims in forensic literature.

Authors:  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison; Daniel Ramos; Rolf Jf Ypma; Nabanita Basu; Kim de Bie; Ewald Enzinger; Zeno Geradts; Didier Meuwly; David van der Vloed; Peter Vergeer; Philip Weber
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 2.  DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges.

Authors:  Roland A H van Oorschot; Georgina E Meakin; Bas Kokshoorn; Mariya Goray; Bianca Szkuta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  On the Identification of Body Fluids and Tissues: A Crucial Link in the Investigation and Solution of Crime.

Authors:  Titia Sijen; SallyAnn Harbison
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  In the context of forensic casework, are there meaningful metrics of the degree of calibration?

Authors:  Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2021-06-12

5.  Interpretation of DNA data within the context of UK forensic science - evaluation.

Authors:  Roberto Puch-Solis; Susan Pope
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.