Lisa M Jones1, Kerry Nolte2, Alyssa J O'Brien3, Jill M Trumbell4, Kimberly J Mitchell5. 1. Crimes against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Drive, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America. Electronic address: lisa.jones@unh.edu. 2. Nursing, University of New Hampshire, Hewitt Hall Rm 220, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America. Electronic address: kerry.nolte@unh.edu. 3. Nursing, University of New Hampshire, Hewitt Hall Rm 220, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America. Electronic address: alyssa.obrien@unh.edu. 4. Human Development & Family Studies, University of New Hampshire, Pettee Hall, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America. Electronic address: jill.trumbell@unh.edu. 5. Crimes against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Drive, Durham, NH 03824, United States of America. Electronic address: kimberly.mitchell@unh.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide information from a large sample of pediatric and family medicine primary care providers on practices in screening children for behavioral health risks. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were a sample of physicians (n=319) and nurse practitioners (n=292) from across the U.S. who completed a confidential online survey about screening practices through a computer-assisted self-interview. RESULTS: Almost all respondents (89%) reported screening children for depression/anxiety and behavior problems. Child substance use (82%), family social support (74%), significant household changes (73%), bullying (72%), child abuse (62%) and domestic violence (52%) were also asked about regularly, although with high rates of informal screening methods. Caregiver mental health (49%), caregiver substance use (35%), family financial strain (33%) and transportation difficulties (27%) were screened less frequently. Screening was associated with higher rates of referral for risk-related problems, and was more likely when providers reported greater confidence providing support to clients, perceived community resource availability as higher, and worked in systems with integrated primary care and behavioral health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a great amount of diversity in how providers screen for behavioral health risks. There is reluctance to screen when options for addressing the problems are seen as limited. Research is needed to better guide healthcare providers in determining the right context and methods for screening social risks. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Protocols for screening adverse childhood events (ACES) and other social risk factors should be accompanied by adequate training and efforts to improve community resource and support networks.
PURPOSE: To provide information from a large sample of pediatric and family medicine primary care providers on practices in screening children for behavioral health risks. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were a sample of physicians (n=319) and nurse practitioners (n=292) from across the U.S. who completed a confidential online survey about screening practices through a computer-assisted self-interview. RESULTS: Almost all respondents (89%) reported screening children for depression/anxiety and behavior problems. Child substance use (82%), family social support (74%), significant household changes (73%), bullying (72%), child abuse (62%) and domestic violence (52%) were also asked about regularly, although with high rates of informal screening methods. Caregiver mental health (49%), caregiver substance use (35%), family financial strain (33%) and transportation difficulties (27%) were screened less frequently. Screening was associated with higher rates of referral for risk-related problems, and was more likely when providers reported greater confidence providing support to clients, perceived community resource availability as higher, and worked in systems with integrated primary care and behavioral health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a great amount of diversity in how providers screen for behavioral health risks. There is reluctance to screen when options for addressing the problems are seen as limited. Research is needed to better guide healthcare providers in determining the right context and methods for screening social risks. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Protocols for screening adverse childhood events (ACES) and other social risk factors should be accompanied by adequate training and efforts to improve community resource and support networks.
Authors: Sara Cibralic; Mafruha Alam; Antonio Mendoza Diaz; Susan Woolfenden; Ilan Katz; Dimitra Tzioumi; Elisabeth Murphy; April Deering; Lorna McNamara; Shanti Raman; Valsamma Eapen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 3.006