Literature DB >> 33460243

Clinical manifestation and genetic analysis in Chinese early onset X-linked retinoschisis.

Li Huang1, Limei Sun1, Zhirong Wang1, Chonglin Chen1, Panfeng Wang1, Wenmin Sun1, Xiaoling Luo1, Xiaoyan Ding1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) is one type of retinal dystrophy leading to the schisis of the neural retina and causing reduced visual acuity. The study aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and retinoschisin 1 (RS1) mutations in Chinese patients with early onset XLRS.
METHODS: Thirty-eight probands with early onset XLRS were recruited, comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed. A targeted gene panel was used to test the RS1 mutations.
RESULTS: All probands had RS1 hemizygous mutations including 16 known and 14 novel mutations. The median onset age was 2 years old (range 0.1-6 years). Probands with onset age ≤1 years. had more complications (retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage, p < 0.001), more mutations outside the discoidin domain and more non-frameshift mutations than probands with onset age >1 years. Macular and peripheral involvement was present in 77.27% of probands, and inner and outer nuclear layer splitting were present in 53.57% of probands. Electroretinography showed an electronegative waveform. The relatively rare phenotypes of lamellar macular hole and macular hole were present in a unilateral eye in three probands.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the early onset XLRS developed more severe complications which need close monitoring and clinical manifestations illustrated here may facilitate the early diagnosis of retinoschisis.
© 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990RS1zzm321990; X‐linked retinoschisis; complications; early onset; rare phenotypes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33460243      PMCID: PMC7549600          DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med        ISSN: 2324-9269            Impact factor:   2.183


INTRODUCTION

X‐linked retinoschisis (XLRS; MIM 312700) is one type of retinal dystrophy that leads to the schisis (splitting) of the neural retina, causing reduced visual acuity. It is the leading cause of macular degeneration in male children with an estimated prevalence ranging between 1:5,000 and 1:20,000 (George, Yates, & Moore, 1995; Molday, Kellner, & Weber, 2012). The typical clinical feature of XLRS is a spoke‐wheel pattern foveal schisis that is associated with a peripheral schisis in about 50% of the affected patients. Foveal involvement has been reported in all affected patients, with mildly to severely reduced visual acuity (George et al., 1995; Tantri et al., 2004). An absent or severely reduced b‐wave found via electroretinography (ERG) is typical for XLRS (Tantri et al., 2004). Spectral‐domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the major diagnostic technique for identifying XLRS. However, because of the inclusion of the infants and preschool children, it is difficult to perform these examinations on the young children. The retinoschisin 1 (RS1) gene is located on the X chromosome. It contains six exons that encode retinoschisin, express exclusively in the retina and function as an octamer. The gene is also implicated in cell‐cell adhesion and interactions (Sikkink, Biswas, Parry, Stanga, & Trump, 2007). RS1 protein contains three functional domains, including a signal sequence (exons 1 and 2), retinoschisin domain (exon 3), and discoidin domain (exons 4–6) (Sauer et al., 1997), which are important during retinal development (The Retinoschisis Consortium, 1998). To date, more than 240 unique mutations in the RS1 gene have been reported as associated with retinoschisis (RS) phenotypes (Human Gene Mutation Database [HGMD], http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php), including 154 missense and nonsense mutations and 23 splicing mutations, with the remaining as small deletions, small insertions, and gross deletions. A great proportion of the mutations are located in the discoidin domain (HGMD). The clinical manifestations of XLRS exhibit a large degree of clinical variability (Apaolaza et al., 2016; Xiao et al., 2016). Previous studies have failed to identify a genotype‐phenotype correlation because of this variability in clinical features. Clinical variability can also lead to misdiagnosis, especially in patients with early onset like XLRS. In this study, we attempted to illustrate the clinical manifestations of early onset XLRS in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Participants

The data from 38 unrelated families with XLRS were collected from the retinal department at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China, from February 2016 to December 2018. The recruitment criteria included a clinical diagnosis of RS conformed by fundus photography (FP) or OCT and a pathogenic mutation in the RS1 gene as well as a disease onset age of less than 6 years old.

Editorial policies and ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center and was performed in accordance with the guidelines described in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their guardians prior to the collection of the clinical data and genomic samples. The genomic DNA was extracted from the leukocytes of venous blood using previously reported methods (Tang et al., 2016).

Sequencing

The genetic testing was performed using a clinical panel targeting genes that are common causes of inherited eye diseases. The targeted resequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Madison, WI, USA) with a SeqCap EZ Library SR kit (Roche NimbleGen Roche, Inc., Madison, WI, USA), Illumina MiSeq v2 kit and Illumina PhiX Control v3 kit. The average sequencing depth was set to 100‐fold. Strand NGS software version 2.0 (Strand Scientific Intelligence Inc.) was used to set the sequencing reads to University of California Santa Cruz hg19. The variation annotation was conducted using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects analysis software. SIFT, Polyphen2_HDIV, Polyphen2_HVAR, LRT, MutationTaster, MutationAssessor, FATHMM, MetaSVM, and MetaLR were used for the bioinformatics analysis. Sanger sequencing was used to verify the mutations and perform a segregation analyses on available family members. All the mutation nomenclature followed Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) guidelines for mutation description (http://www.hgvs.org). Allele frequencies of the variants detected in this study were confirmed by The Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC; http://exac.broadinstitute.org).

Clinical examination

The clinical data collected included the age, gender, onset age, first symptom, and family history of subjects. A complete ophthalmic examination, including a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, slit‐lamp examination, and fundus biomicroscopy, was performed in each patient and their available family members. FP, ERG, and OCT were done with parental consent as required. FP was performed with an FF450 fundus camera (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO, Nidek F‐10, Gamagori, Japan), or RetCam (Clarity Medical Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA). ERG was performed with a RETeval (LKC Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). OCT was performed with a Spectralis HRA (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).

Statistics

The statistics was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21.

RESULTS

Mutations

There were 38 probands included in this study with a pathogenic mutation detected in the RS1 gene, including 16 known and 14 novel mutations (Table 1) (Gehrig et al., 1999; Hiriyanna et al., 1999; Hotta et al., 1998; Molday et al., 2012; Sato, Oshika, Kaji, & Nose, 2003; The Retinoschisis Consortium, 1998; Yu, Li, Li, & Zhang, 2001). All of the mutations were hemizygous and could be verified via Sanger sequencing. Segregation analyses were performed in 35 probands and the available family members, of whom 32 unaffected mothers had a heterozygous RS1 mutation. De novo mutations were detected in three families: c.138dup (p.Asn47Glnfs) in proband QT2590, c.667T>C (p.Cys223Arg) in proband QT2848 and c.592_600del (p.Phe198_Arg200del) in proband QT2905, all of which were absent in their mothers (Figure 1). Proband QT3526 had two RS1 mutations c.193T>C (p.Tyr65His) and c.185‐1G>C as did his unaffected mother. Among the 38 probands, the mutation proportions were missense (25/39, 64.10%), small indels (6/39, 15.38%), nonsense (4/39, 10.25%), frame shift (3/39, 7.69%), and gross deletion (1/39, 2.56%). The mutant alleles were either absent from the ExAC or had a low allele frequency of less than 1/87,544 (Table 1). Ten mutations (25.64%) were detected outside the discoidin domain, and 29 mutations (74.36%) were located within the discoidin domain. The known mutations c.214G>A (p.Glu72Lys), c.305G>A (p.Arg102Gln), and c.579dup (p.Ile194fs) were detected in three (7.89%), four (10.53%), and three (10.53%) probands, respectively, and were considered to be the mutation hot spots of RS1. The novel gross deletion (c.540_675+682del) was verified via Sanger sequencing from forward and the reverse directions (Figure 2a). The segregation analysis was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 2b). The proband QT3526 had two mutations c.193T>C (p.Tyr65His) and c.185‐1G>C in one allele inherited from his mother.
Table 1

RS1 mutations detected in this study

Family IDLocationDNA changeAmino acid changeBioinformaticsExACStatesState of motherReference
QT217218674782c.175T>Gp.Cys59Glyprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT217318660152c.647T>Cp.Leu216Proprobably damaging0HemiNAThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT229418665332c.305G>Ap.Arg102Glnprobably damaging0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT231218660191c.608C>Tp.Pro203Leuprobably damaging0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT232518660212c.587C>Tp.Ser196Pheprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT232918690163c.26T>Ap.Leu9*0HemiheteroNovel
QT234718662681c.391A>Cp.Lys131Glnprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT236118665361c.276G>Cp.Trp92Cysprobably damaging0HemiheteroHotta et al. (1998)
QT239018660256c.540_675+682delsplicing change0HemiheteroNovel
F118665332c.305G>Ap.Arg102Glnprobably damaging0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
F218660156c.643G>Ap.Glu215Lysprobably damaging0HemiHeteroGehrig et al., 1999
F318665332c.305G>Ap.Arg102Glnprobably damaging0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
F418674859c.98G>Ap.Trp33*0HemiHeteroChen et al. (2014)
F518665423c.214G>Ap.Glu72Lysprobably damaging1/87523HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
F618665332c.305G>Ap.Arg102Glnprobably damaging0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT246218660224c.575C>Ap.Pro192Hisprobably damaging0HemiHeteroNovel
QT257118660162c.637C>Tp.Arg213Trpprobably damaging0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT259018674818c.138dupp.Asn47Glnfsframeshift0HeminormalNovel
QT265018665423c.214G>Ap.Glu72Lysprobably damaging1/87523HemiHeteroYu et al. (2001)
QT268118690132c.52+5G>Asplicing change1/87759HemiHeteroNovel
QT290518660203c.592_600delp.Phe198_Arg200del0HeminormalNovel
QT276518660219c.579dupp.Ile194fsframeshift0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT284818660132c.667T>Cp.Cys223Argprobably damaging0HeminormalHiriyanna et al. (1999)
QT306518660212c.587C>Tp.Ser196Pheprobably damaging0HemiHeteroNovel
QT304618665423c.214G>Cp.Glu72Glnprobably damaging1/87523HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT303218660219c.579dupp.Ile194fsframeshift0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT233718665450c.187T>Cp.Cys63Argprobably damaging0HemiHeteroNovel
QT304218660209c.590G>Ap.Arg197Hisprobably damaging0HemiHeteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT293118662549c.522+1G>Asplicing change0HemiNASato et al. (2003)
QT303118662636c.436G>Ap.Glu146Lysprobably damaging0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT296418665414c.223G>Tp.Glu75*1/87544HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT352618665444c.193T>Cp.Tyr65Hisprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT352618665453c.185‐1G>Csplicing change0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT333518660219c.579dupp.Ile194fsframeshift0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT350818662607c.465C>Gp.Tyr155*0HemiheteroNovel
QT313918660200c.599G>Ap.Arg200Hisprobably damaging0HemiheteroThe Retinoschisis Consortium (1998)
QT310818662650c.422G>Cp.Arg141Proprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT346318665450c.187T>Cp.Cys63Argprobably damaging0HemiheteroNovel
QT352318674849c.108delp.Ala37fsframeshift0HemiNANovel

Abbreviations: hemi, hemizygous; hetero, heterozygous; NA, not available.

Figure 1

The pedigrees and sequence chromatography of a family with de novo mutations. Proband QT2590 with a hemizygous c.138dup mutation, proband QT2848 with c.667T>C mutation and QT2905 with a c.592_600del mutation. NC, normal control

Figure 2

Sequence chromatography, segregation analysis and OCT of proband QT2390 with the c.540_675+682del mutation. (a) Sequence chromatography: ‐f stands for sequencing from the forward direction and ‐r stands for sequencing from the reverse direction. (b) Agarose gel electrophoresis image: the amplicons from the father and normal control were 1,087 bp each, the amplicons from the mother harboring a heterozygous c.540_675+682del mutation were 1,087 and 270 bp, and the amplicon from the proband harboring a hemizygous c.540_675+682del mutation was 270 bp. (c) OCT of QT2390 showing the inner nuclear layer splitting of the retina

RS1 mutations detected in this study Abbreviations: hemi, hemizygous; hetero, heterozygous; NA, not available. The pedigrees and sequence chromatography of a family with de novo mutations. Proband QT2590 with a hemizygous c.138dup mutation, proband QT2848 with c.667T>C mutation and QT2905 with a c.592_600del mutation. NC, normal control Sequence chromatography, segregation analysis and OCT of proband QT2390 with the c.540_675+682del mutation. (a) Sequence chromatography: ‐f stands for sequencing from the forward direction and ‐r stands for sequencing from the reverse direction. (b) Agarose gel electrophoresis image: the amplicons from the father and normal control were 1,087 bp each, the amplicons from the mother harboring a heterozygous c.540_675+682del mutation were 1,087 and 270 bp, and the amplicon from the proband harboring a hemizygous c.540_675+682del mutation was 270 bp. (c) OCT of QT2390 showing the inner nuclear layer splitting of the retina

Clinical data

All of the patients were male, with a median examination age of 4 years old (range 0.1–21 years) and a median onset age of 2 years old (range 0.1–6 years) including 17 patients with the onset age equal to or less than 1 year old and 21 patients with the onset age more than 1 year old (Table 2, Figure 3a). The first symptoms consisted of no following (5/38, 13.15%), poor vision (27/38, 71.05%), and strabismus (6/38, 15.79%). The BCVA examinations were conducted in patients more than 4 years who could cooperate with the examination, and the results ranged from no light perception to 0.60 (Table 2). FP was available for 66 eyes of 33 probands, and a spoke‐wheel pattern combined peripheral RS was detected in 51 (77.27%) eyes (Figure 4a,b). OCT was available for 28 probands, from which inner nuclear layer RS was detected in 13 (46.43%) probands (Figure 4c,d) and inner nuclear layer RS combined with outer nuclear layer RS was detected in 15 (53.57%) probands. ERG was obtained for 18 probands and showed an electronegative waveform pattern with a b‐wave amplitude smaller than that of an a‐wave. Nine probands had complications, including five patients (seven eyes) with retinal detachments, and four patients (four eyes) with vitreous hemorrhages.
Table 2

Clinical data of probands with RS1 mutations

Family IDDNA changeAge atAge atFirstBCVAFPOCTComplications
E(y)Onset (y)SymptomsODOSODOSODOSODOS
QT2172c.175T>G5FMBPVSWMSWMIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2173c.647T>C54PVIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2294c.305G>A33PVSWM, PRSWM, PRRD
QT2312c.608C>T31PVSWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRSVH
QT2325c.587C>T0.80.1NFRDRDRDRD
QT2329c.26T>A8FMBPV0.04NLPSWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRSRD
QT2347c.391A>C0.10.1NFSWMSWMIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2361c.276G>C4FMBNFSWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2390c.540_675+682del54Strabismus0.15FC/30CMINRSINRS
F1c.305G>A53PV0.250.12SWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSIN/ONRS, MH
F2c.643G>A54PV0.150.25SWMSWMIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
F3c.305G>A0.60.1NFSWM, PRSWM, PRRDRD
F4c.98G>A41PV0.40FC/40CMSWM, PRSWM, PR, MHINRSINRS, MH
F5c.214G>A44PV0.030.02SWM, PRSWM, PR
F6c.305G>A21StrabismusPRPR
QT2462c.575C>A94PV0.100.30INRSINRS
QT2571c.637C>T54PV0.200.20SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT2590c.138dup71PV0.200.60SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT2650c.214G>A11Strabismus
QT2681c.52+5G>A33PVFC/30CM0.40SWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSNormal
QT2905c.592_600del43PV0.400.05SWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2765c.579dup42PVSWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2848c.667T>C105PV0.200.25SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRSVH
QT3065c.587C>T11StrabismusSWM, PRSWM, PR
QT3046c.214G>C76PV0.100.10SWM, PRSWM, PRIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT3032c.579dup63PVHM/30CM0.10SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT2337c.187T>C53PV0.200.01SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT3042c.590G>A65PVNAIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT2931c.522+1G>A213PV0.020.10SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT3031c.436G>A21PVNANASWM, PRSWM, PR
QT2964c.223G>T42PV0.200.20SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS
QT3526c.193T>C41Strabismus0.250.10SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRSVH
QT3526c.185‐1G>C11Strabismus0.250.10SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRSVH
QT3335c.579dup116PV0.400.30SWMSWMIN/ONRSIN/ONRS
QT3508c.465C>G135PVNANASWMSWM
QT3139c.599G>A10.1StrabismusNANARDSWM, PRINRSINRSRD
QT3108c.422G>C21PVSWM, PRSWM, PR
QT3463c.187T>C31PVPRPR
QT3523c.108del64PV0.200.20SWM, PRSWM, PRINRSINRS

Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; E, examination; FC, finger counting; FMB, first few months after birth; FP, fundus photography; IN/ONRS, inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer retinoschisis; INRS, inner nuclear layer retinoschisis; NA, not available; NF, no following; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PR, peripheral retinoschisis; PV, poor vision; RD, retinal detachment; SWM, spoke‐wheel pattern in the macula; VH, vitreous hemorrhage; y, years old.

Figure 3

Clinical manifestations. (a) The distribution of the onset age. (b) The distribution of complications between groups (onset age ≤1 and >1 year old) with p < 0.001. (c) The mutation locations between groups (p < 0.001). (d) The mutation types between groups. *** p < 0.001

Figure 4

The scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) and OCT of XLRS patients. (a) SLO showing macular and periphery involvement of the retina. (b) SLO showing only the macular involvement. (c) OCT showing inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer splitting. (d) OCT showing inner nuclear layer splitting

Clinical data of probands with RS1 mutations Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; E, examination; FC, finger counting; FMB, first few months after birth; FP, fundus photography; IN/ONRS, inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer retinoschisis; INRS, inner nuclear layer retinoschisis; NA, not available; NF, no following; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PR, peripheral retinoschisis; PV, poor vision; RD, retinal detachment; SWM, spoke‐wheel pattern in the macula; VH, vitreous hemorrhage; y, years old. Clinical manifestations. (a) The distribution of the onset age. (b) The distribution of complications between groups (onset age ≤1 and >1 year old) with p < 0.001. (c) The mutation locations between groups (p < 0.001). (d) The mutation types between groups. *** p < 0.001 The scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) and OCT of XLRS patients. (a) SLO showing macular and periphery involvement of the retina. (b) SLO showing only the macular involvement. (c) OCT showing inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer splitting. (d) OCT showing inner nuclear layer splitting

Difference between patients with onset age equal to or less than 1 year old and more than 1 year old

The patients with the onset age equal to or less than 1 year were assigned to group A, and the patients with the onset age more than 1 year old were assigned to group B. Retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhage were considered to be severe complications of RS which were presented in more patients of group A than patients of group B (p < 0.001, Figure 3b) between groups. Significant difference was also detected in mutation locations (inside the discoidin domain and outside the discoidin domain) and mutation types (non‐frameshift mutations and frameshift mutation) (p < 0.001, Figure 3c,d). Patients in group A had more mutations outside the discoidin domain and had more non‐frameshift mutations.

Clinical data of proband with c.540_675+682del mutation

The patient (QT2390) with the gross deletion mutation (c.540_675+682del) was noticed to have strabismus at the age of 4 years. No treatment was applied to him over the next 1 year. At the age of 5, his BCVAs were 0.15 in the right eye and finger counting at 30 centimeters in the left eye. Macular ectopia in the left eye was showed in the fundus images, which was the reason for poor vision. And the poor vision contributed to the development of strabismus. Splitting of the inner nuclear layer was found in both eyes via OCT (Figure 2c).

Clinical data of probands with the same mutations

Similarity and differences were present in probands with the same mutations. RS was present in the macular area and peripheral retina in all the patients with the p.Arg102Gln mutation; however, retinal detachment also developed in two patients. Among the three patients with the c.579dup mutation, two patients had foveal and peripheral RS and one patient had foveal RS only. Two patients had inner nuclear layer RS combined outer nuclear layer RS, and one patient presented with inner nuclear layer RS.

Rare XLRS phenotypes

Clinical features varied even within the same patient. A rare phenotype was present in this study. A lamellar macular hole was present in one eye but absent in the contralateral eye in patient F1. A macular hole was present in the left eye but absent in the right eye in patient F4 as well as in patient QT2462 (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Clinical features of F4. The left column shows the examination of the right eye and the right column shows the examination of the left eye. (a) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope photography of F4. (b) FP of F4. (c) OCT of the right eye with retinoschisis. OCT of the left eye with macular hole (bottom line, right)

Clinical features of F4. The left column shows the examination of the right eye and the right column shows the examination of the left eye. (a) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope photography of F4. (b) FP of F4. (c) OCT of the right eye with retinoschisis. OCT of the left eye with macular hole (bottom line, right)

DISCUSSION

In this study, 38 early onset XLRS probands with a pathogenic RS1 hemizygous mutation were included. Thirty different mutations were detected, including 16 known and 14 novel mutations. Mutation c.214G>A (p.Glu72Lys), c.305G>A (p.Arg102Gln) and c.579dup (p.Ile194fs) were considered to be the most common mutations in this cohort. This cohort emphasized the clinical manifestations with early onset XLRS. Foveal and peripheral RS was present in 77.27% of patients. Inner nuclear layer RS only was detected in 46.43% of patients, and inner nuclear layer RS combined with outer nuclear layer RS was detected in 53.57% of patients. Significant difference was detected in complications, mutation types, and mutation locations between patients less than or equal to 1 year old and old than 1 year old. Phenotypes of this cohort showed differences from a previous study. Molday et al. mentioned that peripheral RS was present in fewer than 50% of the affected XLRS patients (Molday et al., 2012); however, peripheral RS was present in 77.27% of patients in the current study. Inner nuclear layer RS was detected in 46.43% of patients, and inner nuclear layer RS combined with outer nuclear layer RS was detected in 53.57% of patients. Retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhages was present in approximately 5% of all affected males (Molday et al., 2012) in the general population. Another cohort demonstrated retinal detachment or severe macular lesion happened in 21.4% (3/14) before the age of 4 years, which was consistent with our study. The severe complication including retinal detachment and vitreous hemorrhages presented in 21.1% (8/38), especially in patients with the onset age less than 1 year old. XLRS exhibits a high degree of phenotypic variability (Apaolaza et al., 2016). Several studies have illustrated that even among patients with the same mutations, there is still a great variation in disease severity (Eksandh et al., 2000; Pimenides et al., 2005; Xiao et al., 2016). Our study also demonstrated the clinical variability in XLRS patients but failed to find a phenotype‐genotype correlation. We summarized the clinical features of patients with the same mutation, differences in the severity of clinical phenotypes, extent of the retinal schisis, and complications. Additionally, even in the same patient, the ocular manifestation varied between the eyes. Some of the complications, such as a vitreous hemorrhage or retinal detachment, were detected in only one eye but absent in the contralateral eye. Overall, phenotypic variability makes it difficult to diagnose XLRS, especially in early onset patients who cannot cooperate with the ophthalmic examinations. RS1 mutations were detected by a clinical panel, and the panel contained 126 genes which was reported to be the common causative genes of the inherited retinal diseases from the Retinal Information Network (RetNet: https://sph.uth.edu/retnet/). Although other variations have also been detected by clinical panel sequencing, however, after multiple bioinformatic analysis of the sequencing data, mutation in RS1 was the only mutation which we considered to be the reason for the XLRS. In this study, genetic causes and clinical features of 38 Chinese probands with early onset XLRS were illustrated. The 14 novel mutations presented in this study expanded the mutation spectrum of RS1. Compared to the previous reported cohort of XLRS, patients with early onset age had higher incidence of peripheral RS as well as higher incidence of inner and outer nuclear layer splitting. Among the early onset cohort with RS, the patients with the onset age less than or equal to 1 year old were more likely to develop severe complications. Meanwhile, the RS1 mutation types and mutation locations were different. With an understanding of early onset XLRS, early diagnosis, and close observation may reduce the vision threatening complications.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

All authors have no conflict of interest in the conduct of this study.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Data duration: Li Huang, Zhirong Wang, Xiaoling Luo, Wenmin Sun, Panfeng Wang, and Chonglin Chen. Funding acquisition: Li Huang and Xiaoyan Ding. Investigation: Xiaoyan Ding. Writing – original draft: Li Huang. Writing – review & editing: Limei Sun and Xiaoyan Ding.
  17 in total

1.  Assessment of RS1 in X-linked juvenile retinoschisis and sporadic senile retinoschisis.

Authors:  A Gehrig; K White; B Lorenz; M Andrassi; S Clemens; B H Weber
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  X-linked juvenile retinoschisis: clinical diagnosis, genetic analysis, and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert S Molday; Ulrich Kellner; Bernhard H F Weber
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  X linked retinoschisis.

Authors:  N D George; J R Yates; A T Moore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [Identification of mutation of the X-linked juvenile retinoschisis gene].

Authors:  P Yu; J Li; R Li; W Zhang
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2001-04

5.  X-linked retinoschisis: clinical phenotype and RS1 genotype in 86 UK patients.

Authors:  D Pimenides; N D L George; J R W Yates; K Bradshaw; S A Roberts; A T Moore; D Trump
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Phenotypic expression of juvenile X-linked retinoschisis in Swedish families with different mutations in the XLRS1 gene.

Authors:  L C Eksandh; V Ponjavic; R Ayyagari; E L Bingham; K T Hiriyanna; S Andréasson; B Ehinger; P A Sieving
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08

7.  Japanese juvenile retinoschisis is caused by mutations of the XLRS1 gene.

Authors:  Y Hotta; K Fujiki; M Hayakawa; T Ohta; T Fujimaki; K Tamaki; T Yokoyama; A Kanai; A Hirakata; T Hida; S Nishina; N Azuma
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  X-linked retinoschisis: an update.

Authors:  Stephen K Sikkink; Susmito Biswas; Neil R A Parry; Paulo E Stanga; Dorothy Trump
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Novel mutations of the RS1 gene in a cohort of Chinese families with X-linked retinoschisis.

Authors:  Jieqiong Chen; Ke Xu; Xiaohui Zhang; Zhe Pan; Bing Dong; Yang Li
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  Functional implications of the spectrum of mutations found in 234 cases with X-linked juvenile retinoschisis. The Retinoschisis Consortium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  5 in total

1.  Predominant Founder Effect among Recurrent Pathogenic Variants for an X-Linked Disorder.

Authors:  Chelsea Bender; Elizabeth Geena Woo; Bin Guan; Ehsan Ullah; Eric Feng; Amy Turriff; Santa J Tumminia; Paul A Sieving; Catherine A Cukras; Robert B Hufnagel
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Clinical and Genetic Study of X-Linked Juvenile Retinoschisis in the Czech Population.

Authors:  Bohdan Kousal; Lucia Hlavata; Hana Vlaskova; Lenka Dvorakova; Michaela Brichova; Zora Dubska; Hana Langrova; Andrea L Vincent; Lubica Dudakova; Petra Liskova
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Phenotype Heterogeneity and the Association Between Visual Acuity and Outer Retinal Structure in a Cohort of Chinese X-Linked Juvenile Retinoschisis Patients.

Authors:  Qingge Guo; Ya Li; Jiarui Li; Ya You; Changgeng Liu; Kang Chen; Shuyin Li; Bo Lei
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Vitreous hemorrhage in X-linked retinoschisis.

Authors:  M Margarita Parra; M Elizabeth Hartnett
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  A novel mutation in RS1 and clinical manifestations in a Chinese twin family with congenital retinoschisis.

Authors:  Xiao-Fang Wang; Fei-Fei Chen; Xin Zhou; Xin-Xuan Cheng; Zheng-Gao Xie
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.772

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.