Literature DB >> 3346009

Mitosis counting in seminoma: an exercise of questionable significance.

M H Zuckman1, G Williams, H S Levin.   

Abstract

Two pathologists reviewed and classified 45 cases of testicular seminoma, evaluating each case for multiple histologic variables, including mitotic rate. In addition to recording the mitotic count for each of thirty 0.1963-mm2 high-power fields, the investigators recorded the distribution of mitotic counts in many non-spermatocytic seminomas. Statistically significant differences for mitotic rate in the nonspermatocytic tumors were noted between the observers; one observer found a mean mitotic rate of 1.815/high-power field for 43 such tumors, whereas the other noted a mean mitotic rate of 1.388/high-power field (p = 0.001). These differences led to disagreement on the classification of 3 tumors. Of the 4 cases considered to be high-mitotic-rate seminomas by one or both observers, all patients had presented with stage I disease. Three of the patients were followed up for 23, 55, and 56 months, and all were free of disease; the fourth was lost to follow-up. The patient with the highest mitotic rate was free of disease at 55 months of follow-up. On the basis of our findings we question the value of the designation high-mitotic-rate seminoma. Analysis of the distribution of mitotic counts within the tumors revealed them to be Poisson distributed. With these data and other empirically derived data, it was possible to estimate the probability of misclassification of seminoma based on mitotic rate, the diagnostic mitotic rate threshold, and the number of fields counted for mitoses. Similar analysis might be valuable for other tumors, particularly those of smooth muscle origin, in which mitotic rate is of diagnostic or prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3346009     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80528-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Testicular seminomas. The classical and the less classical ones].

Authors:  P K Bode; H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Time trends in accuracy of classification of testicular tumours, with clinical and epidemiological implications.

Authors:  J M Stone; T F Sandeman; P Ironside; D G Cruickshank; J P Matthews
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.