Literature DB >> 33459920

Comprehensive analysis of the homeobox family genes in breast cancer demonstrates their similar roles in cancer and development.

Ayako Nakashoji1, Tetsu Hayashida2, Shigeo Yamaguchi1, Yuko Kawai1, Masayuki Kikuchi1, Takamichi Yokoe1, Aiko Nagayama1, Tomoko Seki1, Maiko Takahashi1, Yuko Kitagawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The homeobox (HOX) family consists of 39 genes whose expressions are tightly controlled and coordinated within the family, during development. We performed a comprehensive analysis of this gene family in cancer settings.
METHODS: Gene correlation analysis was performed using breast cancer data available in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and data from the patients admitted to our hospital. We also analyzed the data of normal breast tissue (GSE20437). We next collected gene expression and prognosis data of breast cancer patients (GSE11121, GSE7390, GSE3494, and GSE2990) and performed unsupervised hierarchal clustering by the HOX gene expression pattern and compared prognosis. We additionally performed this analysis to leukemia (available in TCGA) and sarcoma (GSE20196) data.
RESULTS: Gene correlation analysis showed that the proximal HOX genes exhibit strong interactions and are expressed together in breast cancer, similar to the expression observed during development. However, in normal breast tissue, less interactions were observed. Breast cancer microarray meta-data classified by the HOX gene expression pattern predicted the prognosis of luminal B breast cancer patients (p = 0.016). Leukemia (p = 0.00016) and sarcoma (p = 0.018) presented similar results. The Wnt signaling pathway, one of the major upstream signals of HOX genes in development, was activated in the poor prognostic group. Interestingly, poor prognostic cancer presented stronger correlation in the gene family compared to favorable prognostic cancer.
CONCLUSION: Comprehensive analysis of the HOX family demonstrated their similar roles in cancer and development, and indicated that the strong interaction of HOX genes might be specific to malignancies, especially in the case of poor prognostic cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Correlation; Development; Embryogenesis; Homeobox; Wnt signaling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33459920     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06087-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  29 in total

1.  Epigenetic temporal control of mouse Hox genes in vivo.

Authors:  Natalia Soshnikova; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The Hox genes and their roles in oncogenesis.

Authors:  Nilay Shah; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Cdx is crucial for the timing mechanism driving colinear Hox activation and defines a trunk segment in the Hox cluster topology.

Authors:  Roel Neijts; Shilu Amin; Carina van Rooijen; Jacqueline Deschamps
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Hox genes control vertebrate body elongation by collinear Wnt repression.

Authors:  Nicolas Denans; Tadahiro Iimura; Olivier Pourquié
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Hox genes in the adult skeleton: Novel functions beyond embryonic development.

Authors:  Danielle R Rux; Deneen M Wellik
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.780

6.  Overexpression of CDX2 perturbs HOX gene expression in murine progenitors depending on its N-terminal domain and is closely correlated with deregulated HOX gene expression in human acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Vijay P S Rawat; Silvia Thoene; Vegi M Naidu; Natalia Arseni; Bernhard Heilmeier; Klaus Metzeler; Konstantin Petropoulos; Aniruddha Deshpande; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Stefan K Bohlander; Karsten Spiekermann; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Michaela Feuring-Buske; Christian Buske
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Cdx and Hox genes differentially regulate posterior axial growth in mammalian embryos.

Authors:  Teddy Young; Jennifer Elizabeth Rowland; Cesca van de Ven; Monika Bialecka; Ana Novoa; Marta Carapuco; Johan van Nes; Wim de Graaff; Isabelle Duluc; Jean-Noël Freund; Felix Beck; Moises Mallo; Jacqueline Deschamps
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 8.  HOX genes function in Breast Cancer development.

Authors:  Simone Aparecida de Bessa Garcia; Mafalda Araújo; Tiago Pereira; João Mouta; Renata Freitas
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 9.  Embryonic timing, axial stem cells, chromatin dynamics, and the Hox clock.

Authors:  Jacqueline Deschamps; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  The role of Cdx2 as a lineage specific transcriptional repressor for pluripotent network during the first developmental cell lineage segregation.

Authors:  Daosheng Huang; Guoji Guo; Ping Yuan; Amy Ralston; Lingang Sun; Mikael Huss; Tapan Mistri; Luca Pinello; Huck Hui Ng; Guocheng Yuan; Junfeng Ji; Janet Rossant; Paul Robson; Xiaoping Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Long Non-Coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in Female Oriented Cancers.

Authors:  Faiza Naz; Imran Tariq; Sajid Ali; Ahmed Somaida; Eduard Preis; Udo Bakowsky
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.639

2.  Prokineticins as a Prognostic Biomarker for Low-Grade Gliomas: A Study Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas Data.

Authors:  Junqing Zhong; Ding Xiang; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.