| Literature DB >> 33458754 |
Gillian Taormina1, Ramya Gopinath1, Jason Moore2, Yuliya Yasinskaya1, Philip Colangelo2, Kellie Reynolds2, Sumati Nambiar1.
Abstract
Pathogenesis of neonatal candidiasis (NC) is distinct from systemic candidiasis in adults and older pediatric patients due to the significant incidence of central nervous system involvement in neonates. Thus, although adequate and well-controlled trials in NC are often unfeasible due to difficulty enrolling patients, extrapolation of efficacy from antifungal drug trials in adults is generally not appropriate. However, treatment of NC is an area of great unmet need. We describe a regulatory review approach that combined the assessment of limited clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety data from neonates and young infants along with microbiology outcomes and pharmacokinetic data from relevant nonclinical models of candidemia/invasive candidiasis to inform the use of micafungin in pediatric patients younger than 4 months, while communicating areas of remaining uncertainty in labeling. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2021.Entities:
Keywords: animal model; meningoencephalitis; neonatal candidiasis; regulatory approach
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33458754 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079