Literature DB >> 33458613

Memory CD8+ T cell heterogeneity is primarily driven by pathogen-specific cues and additionally shaped by the tissue environment.

Esmé T I van der Gracht1, Guillaume Beyrend1, Tamim Abdelaal2,3, Iris N Pardieck1, Thomas H Wesselink1, Floortje J van Haften1, Suzanne van Duikeren1, Frits Koning1, Ramon Arens1.   

Abstract

Factors that govern the complex formation of memory T cells are not completely understood. A better understanding of the development of memory T cell heterogeneity is however required to enhance vaccination and immunotherapy approaches. Here we examined the impact of pathogen- and tissue-specific cues on memory CD8+ T cell heterogeneity using high-dimensional single-cell mass cytometry and a tailored bioinformatics pipeline. We identified distinct populations of pathogen-specific CD8+ T cells that uniquely connected to a specific pathogen or associated to multiple types of acute and persistent infections. In addition, the tissue environment shaped the memory CD8+ T cell heterogeneity, albeit to a lesser extent than infection. The programming of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during acute infection is eventually superseded by persistent infection. Thus, the plethora of distinct memory CD8+ T cell subsets that arise upon infection is dominantly sculpted by the pathogen-specific cues and further shaped by the tissue environment.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell Biology; Immunology

Year:  2020        PMID: 33458613      PMCID: PMC7797528          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


  53 in total

1.  Memory T cells in nonlymphoid tissue that provide enhanced local immunity during infection with herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  Thomas Gebhardt; Linda M Wakim; Liv Eidsmo; Patrick C Reading; William R Heath; Francis R Carbone
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Expression of chemokine receptor CXCR3 on T cells affects the balance between effector and memory CD8 T-cell generation.

Authors:  Joyce K Hu; Takashi Kagari; Jonathan M Clingan; Mehrdad Matloubian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  PD-1+ stemlike CD8 T cells are resident in lymphoid tissues during persistent LCMV infection.

Authors:  Se Jin Im; Bogumila T Konieczny; William H Hudson; David Masopust; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Deep Profiling Human T Cell Heterogeneity by Mass Cytometry.

Authors:  Y Cheng; E W Newell
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.543

5.  Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection.

Authors:  Daniel L Barber; E John Wherry; David Masopust; Baogong Zhu; James P Allison; Arlene H Sharpe; Gordon J Freeman; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections.

Authors:  Victor Appay; P Rod Dunbar; Margaret Callan; Paul Klenerman; Geraldine M A Gillespie; Laura Papagno; Graham S Ogg; Abigail King; Franziska Lechner; Celsa A Spina; Susan Little; Diane V Havlir; Douglas D Richman; Norbert Gruener; Gerd Pape; Anele Waters; Philippa Easterbrook; Mariolina Salio; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Andrew J McMichael; Sarah L Rowland-Jones
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells shape local and systemic secondary T cell responses.

Authors:  Felix M Behr; Loreto Parga-Vidal; Natasja A M Kragten; Teunis J P van Dam; Thomas H Wesselink; Brian S Sheridan; Ramon Arens; Rene A W van Lier; Regina Stark; Klaas P J M van Gisbergen
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 25.606

8.  Tissue-resident memory T cell reactivation by diverse antigen-presenting cells imparts distinct functional responses.

Authors:  Jun Siong Low; Yagmur Farsakoglu; Maria Carolina Amezcua Vesely; Esen Sefik; Joseph B Kelly; Christian C D Harman; Ruaidhri Jackson; Justin A Shyer; Xiaodong Jiang; Linda S Cauley; Richard A Flavell; Susan M Kaech
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Coregulation of CD8+ T cell exhaustion by multiple inhibitory receptors during chronic viral infection.

Authors:  Shawn D Blackburn; Haina Shin; W Nicholas Haining; Tao Zou; Creg J Workman; Antonio Polley; Michael R Betts; Gordon J Freeman; Dario A A Vignali; E John Wherry
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 25.606

10.  Functional classification of memory CD8(+) T cells by CX3CR1 expression.

Authors:  Jan P Böttcher; Marc Beyer; Felix Meissner; Zeinab Abdullah; Jil Sander; Bastian Höchst; Sarah Eickhoff; Jan C Rieckmann; Caroline Russo; Tanja Bauer; Tobias Flecken; Dominik Giesen; Daniel Engel; Steffen Jung; Dirk H Busch; Ulrike Protzer; Robert Thimme; Matthias Mann; Christian Kurts; Joachim L Schultze; Wolfgang Kastenmüller; Percy A Knolle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Functional Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Targeting of Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells.

Authors:  Esmé T I van der Gracht; Felix M Behr; Ramon Arens
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  A third vaccination with a single T cell epitope confers protection in a murine model of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Tetje C van der Sluis; Esmé T I van der Gracht; Iris N Pardieck; Dominique M B Veerkamp; Felix M Behr; Suzanne van Duikeren; Guillaume Beyrend; Jasper Rip; Reza Nadafi; Elham Beyranvand Nejad; Nils Mülling; Dena J Brasem; Marcel G M Camps; Sebenzile K Myeni; Peter J Bredenbeek; Marjolein Kikkert; Yeonsu Kim; Luka Cicin-Sain; Tamim Abdelaal; Klaas P J M van Gisbergen; Kees L M C Franken; Jan Wouter Drijfhout; Cornelis J M Melief; Gerben C M Zondag; Ferry Ossendorp; Ramon Arens
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.