Babu Salma1, Prakash Janhavi2,3, Saravanan Muthaiah2,4,3, Pattar Veeresh5, Manjula Santhepete Nanjundaiah1, Sheshadri Divyashree2, Muthukumar Serva Peddha2,3. 1. Department of Pharmacology, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru 570015, Karnataka, India. 2. Department of Biochemistry, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysuru 570020, Karnataka, India. 3. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India. 4. Vipragen Biosciences Private Limited, Hootagalli, Mysuru 570018, Karnataka, India. 5. PG Wing of SBRR Mahajana First Grade College, Pooja Bhagavat Memorial Mahajana Education Centre, Metagalli, Mysuru 570016, Karnataka, India.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a major metabolic disorder worldwide. Several herbs are being tested for the management of diabetes. Cassia auriculata is one of those herbs known for its nutritional value and health benefits. However, limited scientific evidence has been shown on the elucidation of its root bioactives as well as biological activity. This study attempted to identify and characterize phenolic compounds from the potent root extract and to evaluate its antioxidant as well as antidiabetic properties in both in vitro and in vivo models. The results revealed that the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents were highest in the methanolic extract. The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the highest antioxidant and antidiabetic activities in vitro than other extracts. These biological activities may be because the extract is rich in coumaric acid and -OH groups as revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analyses, respectively. Further, the antidiabetic activity of the methanolic extract was studied in a diet-induced type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) C57BL/6 mouse model. A significant increase in fasting blood glucose and decreased plasma insulin levels in T2DM mice confirmed the development of the diabetic condition. In addition, the T2DM mice showed oxidative stress in the plasma as well as muscle tissue and significant alterations in the plasma biochemistry, viz., lipid profile, liver, and renal function tests. However, the administration of the ethanolic extract of the C. auriculata root (150 mg/kg body weight) to T2DM mice normalized the condition comparable to that of control mice. Thus, the extract can be used as a potent antioxidant and antidiabetic agent in pharmaceutical companies.
Diabetes mellitus is a major metabolic disorder worldwide. Several herbs are being tested for the management of diabetes. Cassia auriculata is one of those herbs known for its nutritional value and health benefits. However, limited scientific evidence has been shown on the elucidation of its root bioactives as well as biological activity. This study attempted to identify and characterize phenolic compounds from the potent root extract and to evaluate its antioxidant as well as antidiabetic properties in both in vitro and in vivo models. The results revealed that the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents were highest in the methanolic extract. The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the highest antioxidant and antidiabetic activities in vitro than other extracts. These biological activities may be because the extract is rich in coumaric acid and -OH groups as revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analyses, respectively. Further, the antidiabetic activity of the methanolic extract was studied in a diet-induced type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) C57BL/6 mouse model. A significant increase in fasting blood glucose and decreased plasma insulin levels in T2DM mice confirmed the development of the diabetic condition. In addition, the T2DM mice showed oxidative stress in the plasma as well as muscle tissue and significant alterations in the plasma biochemistry, viz., lipid profile, liver, and renal function tests. However, the administration of the ethanolic extract of the C. auriculata root (150 mg/kg body weight) to T2DM mice normalized the condition comparable to that of control mice. Thus, the extract can be used as a potent antioxidant and antidiabetic agent in pharmaceutical companies.
The naturally available
herbs are being used as an alternative for allopathic drugs since
ancient times in the ayurvedic system of medicine. The natural herbs
gain importance over allopathy since the former have less or no side
effects. The natural herbs viz., Curcuma
longa, Withania somnifera, Acorus calamus, Tinospora
cordifolia, Zingiber officinale, Asparagus racemosus, Garcinia cambogia, Moringa oliefera, Piper longa, Terminalia
chebula, etc., have been proven to
act effectively against various deadly diseased conditions.[1]Cassia auriculata is one such herb known for its potency against various ailments.
It is an evergreen shrub with attractive yellow flowers, belonging
to the family Caesalpiniaceae. This shrub grows in different parts
of Asia including India.[2] Various studies
reported medicinal properties of different parts of the plant C. auriculata. For instance, tea from the leaves
is used against chronic fever and as an anthelminthic,[3] the methanolic extract of leaves and the aqueous extract
of whole plant powder have antibacterial properties,[4] the leaf extract also has anticancer properties,[5] the ethanolic extract of roots shows hepatoprotective
properties,[6] and the aqueous extract of
leaves reduces glucose and oxidative stress markers in streptozotocin-induced
diabeticrats.[7] The aqueous extract of
the flowers has antioxidant properties as it decreased oxidative stress
in diabeticrats.[8] The ethanolic extract
of buds and flowers showed antidiabetic properties both in
vitro and in vivo,[9] the water extract of buds and flowers reduced blood sugar levels,[2] and the ethanolic extract of leaves and flowers
managed the diabetic condition by acting as an insulin secretagogue
agent.[10] Further, it has been reported
that the chloroform extract of aerial parts of the herb showed the
antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
and fungi.[11] A comparative study among
the different parts of the herb as reported by Uma Devi et al.[12] revealed that the flower and leaf extract has
a potent antidiabetic property by reducing the serum glucose level
and increasing plasma insulin levels. These biological properties
of the herb C. auriculata may be because
of the presence of bioactives. Hence, understanding the phytochemical
constituents of the herb or its parts provides the knowledge of its
biological properties. However, there are no studies on the quantification
of different bioactives in the root of C. auriculata and its potential antidiabetic properties. Hence, this study aimed
to investigate the presence of different phytochemical constituents
in the root of C. auriculata both qualitatively
and quantitatively and also to determine its biological properties
such as antioxidant and antidiabetic activities in both in
vitro and in vivo models.
Results
Color and Yield of the Extracts of the Root
of C. auriculata with Different Solvents
The different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root showed different colors, i.e., chloroform,
ethanol, methanol, and aqueous extracts showed yellow, dark brown,
light green, and light brown colors, respectively (Table ). The methanolic extract showed
the highest yield of 13.8% (w/w), followed by the ethanolic extract
with a yield of 11.65%, the aqueous extract with a yield of 10.4%,
and the chloroform extract with a yield of 5% (Table ).
Table 1
Color and Yield of
the Extracts of Roots of C. auriculata with Different Solvents
solvent
color
% yield (g/100 g)
chloroform
yellow
5
ethanol
dark brown
11.6
methanol
light green
13.8
aqueous
light brown
10.4
Estimation of Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids
The methanol extract of the root of C. auriculata has the highest total polyphenols, followed by aqueous, ethanol,
and chloroform extracts (Table ). Similarly, the methanol extract of the root of C. auriculata possessed the highest amount of flavonoids,
followed by ethanol, aqueous and chloroform extracts. This shows that
methanol is a more potent solvent to extract the maximum amount of
total polyphenols and flavonoids. The least amount of polyphenols
and flavonoids was extracted from the chloroform extract among all
of the other extracts.
Table 2
Total Polyphenols
and Flavonoid Content of Different Solvent Extracts of C. auriculata RootA,B
solvents
total polyphenols (mg/100 g of the sample)
flavonoid (mg/100 g of the sample)
chloroform
1454.33 ± 19.52a
832.53 ± 17.04a
ethanol
6531.69 ± 196.83b
1340.79 ± 1.14c
methanol
8979.04 ± 495.59c
1647.12 ± 20.71d
aqueous
8301.26 ± 269.29c
1111.14 ± 10.52b
significance
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
To know the different phenolic
acids in the different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root, the retention times of the extracts in the chromatogram were
compared with those of the accurate standards. The results of HPLC
analysis of different extracts are represented in Table . The chloroform extract showed
peaks for epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, and gallic acid. The ethanolic
extract showed peaks similar to those of epicatechin, gallic acid,
ferulic acid, syringic acid, whereas the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed peaks matching with those
of epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, syringic
acid, and coumaric acid standards. Further, in the aqueous extract,
epicatechin, ferulic acid, and coumaric acid were absent and chlorogenic
acid, gallic acid, syringic acid, tannic acid, resveratrol, caffeic
acid, and protocatechuic acid were present (Figure ). The highest amounts of gallic acid, syringic
acid, and coumaric acid were found in chloroform, ethanol, and aqueous
and methanolic extracts, respectively.
Table 3
Polyphenolic Profile
of Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata RootA,B
chloroform
ethanol
methanol
aqueous
epicatechin (mg/100 g)
13.07 ± 0.39c
3.15 ± 0.03b
46.69 ± 0.27d
ND
chlorogenic acid (mg/100 g)
0.60 ± 0.01b
ND
44.24 ± 0.24d
3.12 ± 0.04c
gallic acid (mg/100 g)
27.68 ± 0.44b
20.88 ± 0.39a
39.85 ± 0.54c
27.68 ± 0.44b
ferulic acid (mg/100 g)
ND
46.22 ± 0.29c
22.68 ± 0.04b
ND
syringic acid (mg/100 g)
ND
70.98 ± 0.38c
18.24 ± 0.28b
79.57 ± 0.26d
coumaric
acid (mg/100 g)
ND
ND
189.47 ± 0.30b
ND
tannic acid (mg/100 g)
ND
ND
ND
2.24 ± 0.01b
resveratrol (mg/100 g)
ND
ND
ND
1.64 ± 0.04b
caffeic acid (mg/100 g)
ND
ND
ND
18.05 ± 0.38b
protocatechuic
acid (mg/100 g)
ND
ND
ND
51.59 ± 0.40b
Note: All of the
values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given row are
not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Figure 1
HPLC chromatograms of
different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root showing the polyphenols present. (A) Gallic acid; (B) epicatechin;
(C) chlorogenic acid; (D) ferulic acid; (E) tannic acid; (F) synergic
acid; (G) resveratrol; (H) coumaric acid; (I) caffeic acid; (J) protocatechuic
acid.
HPLC chromatograms of
different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root showing the polyphenols present. (A) Gallic acid; (B) epicatechin;
(C) chlorogenic acid; (D) ferulic acid; (E) tannic acid; (F) synergic
acid; (G) resveratrol; (H) coumaric acid; (I) caffeic acid; (J) protocatechuic
acid.Note: All of the
values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given row are
not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Analysis of Different
Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata Root
The different functional groups in different solvent
extracts of the C. auriculata root
were determined by FTIR analysis. The FTIR spectra revealed that the
four extracts studied showed a strong, broad stretching band at 3300
cm–1, with methanolic and aqueous extracts showing
broader bands than those of other extracts (chloroform extract, 3332
cm–1; ethanol extract, 3423; aqueous extract 3242;
methanolic extract 3251 cm–1). A broad stretching
band at 3300 cm–1 indicates the presence of intermolecular
−OH groups (Figure ). In addition, bands at 2924, 2906, 2949 and 2837, and 2879
cm–1 in chloroform, ethanol, methanol, and aqueous
extracts, respectively, indicate the presence of a C–H stretching
alkane. Further, bands at 1614 cm–1 (C=C
stretching conjugated alkene), 1455 cm–1 (C–H
bending alkane methylene group), 1214 cm–1 (C–N
stretching amine), and 754 cm–1 (C–Cl stretching
halo compound) for the chloroform extract; 3195 cm–1 (broad O–H stretching alcohol intramolecularly bonded) and
1035 cm–1 (C–O stretching primary alcohol)
for the ethanol extract; 1652, 1565, 1480 cm–1 (C=N
stretching imine/oxime), 1411 cm–1 (O–H bending
carboxylic acid), and 606 cm–1 (C–I stretching
halo compound) for the methanolic extract; and 1550 cm–1 (N–O stretching nitro compound), 1413 cm–1 (C–H bending alkane methyl group), and 603 cm–1 (C–I stretching halo compound) for the aqueous extract were
observed.
Figure 2
FTIR spectra of (a) chloroform, (b) ethanol, (c) methanol and (d)
aqueous extracts of the C. auriculata root showing bands of different functional groups. Note the band
between 3600 and 3000 cm–1, suggesting the presence
of −OH groups in all of the four extracts, and significantly
broader in the spectra of the methanolic extract.
FTIR spectra of (a) chloroform, (b) ethanol, (c) methanol and (d)
aqueous extracts of the C. auriculata root showing bands of different functional groups. Note the band
between 3600 and 3000 cm–1, suggesting the presence
of −OH groups in all of the four extracts, and significantly
broader in the spectra of the methanolic extract.
Antioxidant Activity
2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) Assay
The antioxidant ability of the different solvent
extracts of C. auriculata was determined
by calculating the IC50 values, wherein the samples with
the least IC50 value show the robust scavenging activity
against DPPH free radicals. Among the different solvent extracts from
the C. auriculata root, the methanolic
extract showed the maximum DPPH scavenging activity with the lowest
IC50 value (42.87 ± 1.5 μg/mL), followed by
ethanol (46.24 ± 1.78 μg/mL), aqueous (57.04 ± 2.75
μg/mL), and chloroform extracts (60.55 ± 5.29 μg/mL)
(Table ).
Table 4
IC50 Values of DPPH and FRAP Assays of
Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata RootA,B
solvents
DPPH (μg/mL)
FRAP (μg/mL)
chloroform
60.55 ± 5.29b
67.59 ± 0.75c
ethanol
46.24 ± 1.78a
52.44 ± 0.46b
methanol
42.87 ± 1.51a
47.13 ± 0.37a
aqueous
57.04 ± 2.75b
95.68 ± 1.50d
standard
43.29 ± 1.17a
50.76 ± 0.43b
significance
P < 0.05
P < 0.001
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Ferric
Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)
In this study, the methanolic
extract of C. auriculata showed the
highest ferric reducing antioxidant power, followed by ethanol, chloroform,
and aqueous extracts as shown in Table , and the inhibitory concentrations were found to be
close to those of standards. The IC50 values of methanolic,
ethanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts were 47.13 ± 0.37,
52.44 ± 0.46, 67.59 ± 0.75, and 95.68 ± 1.50 μg/mL,
respectively, indicating that the methanol extract has more antioxidant
potency than the other extracts of the root studied.As the
methanolic extract of the root showed the highest content of polyphenols
and exhibited the highest antioxidant potential, it was selected for
further in vitro and in vivo studies.
Antidiabetic Activity
α-Amylase
and α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay
The methanolic extract
inhibited α-amylase activity in a dose-dependent manner. The
IC50 value of the extract for inhibiting the α-amylase
activity is represented in Figure , wherein the IC50 value is 44.75 ±
1.31 μg/mL compared to that of the standard (81.19 ± 1.34
μg/mL). Similarly, the methanolic extract inhibited the α-glucosidase
activity, and the result is represented in Figure . The IC50 value of the extract
for inhibiting α-glucosidase activity is 66.86 ± 1.72 μg/mL
compared to that of its standard 94.83 ± 9.83 μg/mL.
Figure 3
Vertical bar
graphs showing the inhibitory potency of the methanolic extract of
the C. auriculata root for the activities
of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Note: All of the values
are mean ± SEM. * Indicates that groups are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Vertical bar
graphs showing the inhibitory potency of the methanolic extract of
the C. auriculata root for the activities
of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Note: All of the values
are mean ± SEM. * Indicates that groups are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of the C. auriculata Root Extract on Body Weight
In this present study, diabetes
was induced with a combination of high fat diet and a low dose of
streptozotocin (STZ) and the effect of the C. auriculata root extracts was evaluated. The change in the body weight of mice
of different groups is presented in Figure . The mice were fed with the high-fat diet
for 11 weeks; thus, a considerable increase in body weight was observed
among the high-fat-diet-fed mice as compared to the control group.
After the induction of diabetes, the weight of mice in the diabetic
group significantly reduced, whereas the treatment with the C. auriculata root extract could help in regaining
the weight much better than the metformin-treated group.
Figure 4
Line graph
showing the change in the weight of the body of different experimental
group mice throughout the experiment. Note a significant increase
in the weight of the body till 11th week in the high-fat-diet-fed
mice and a gradual decrease in those treated with metformin and the
methanolic extract but not in diabetic mice compared to control mice.
Line graph
showing the change in the weight of the body of different experimental
group mice throughout the experiment. Note a significant increase
in the weight of the body till 11th week in the high-fat-diet-fed
mice and a gradual decrease in those treated with metformin and the
methanolic extract but not in diabeticmice compared to control mice.
Effect of the Methanolic
Extract the C. auriculata Root on Fasting
Blood Glucose Levels
After 5 days of diabetes induction by
STZ, all mice were tested for the blood glucose level, and the levels
above 200 mg/dL confirmed the induction of diabetes in the mice. The
blood glucose levels of all the four groups were monitored on a weekly
basis. The control group showed normal blood glucose levels throughout
the experiment in contrast to the diabetic group, which showed a gradual
increase in the blood glucose level every week, a sign of uncontrolled
diabetes (Figure ).
The treatment with metformin for 4 weeks could effectively reduce
blood glucose in diabeticrats, and almost equal to the level of control
mice at the end of the experiment (8th week). Similarly, the treatment
with the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root also showed a significant reduction in the blood glucose level
gradually, reduced to half when compared to the initial level after
3 weeks of treatment and further decreased to the level of metformin
toward the end of the experiment.
Figure 5
Line graph showing the fasting blood glucose
level in different experimental group mice during the treatment period.
Note a significantly elevated level of fasting blood glucose levels
in the diabetic mice compared to control and the mice treated with
the methanolic extract of C. auriculata and metformin treated diabetic mice.
Line graph showing the fasting blood glucose
level in different experimental group mice during the treatment period.
Note a significantly elevated level of fasting blood glucose levels
in the diabeticmice compared to control and the mice treated with
the methanolic extract of C. auriculata and metformin treated diabeticmice.
Effect of Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Antioxidant Status in the
Plasma and Muscles
The antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide
dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were significantly decreased in
diabeticmice compared with those of control animals in both the plasma
and muscles (Table ). However, the activities of SOD and CAT were increased even above
the control level in the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root- and metformin-treated mice.
Table 5
Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Activities of Antioxidant
Enzymes in the Serum and Muscle of Experimental GroupsA,B
SOD (U/mg protein)
CAT (nmol/mg/min)
plasma
muscle
plasma
muscle
control
1875.24 ± 197.12b
10.38 ± 0.62b
0.25 ± 0.03b
1.13 ± 0.12a
diabetes
549.58 ± 69.39a
6.21 ± 0.87a
0.12 ± 0.01a
0.48 ± 0.11b
diabetes + metformin
2268.68 ± 77.31b,c
8.78 ± 1.12b
0.4 ± 0.08c
2.4 ± 0.19c
diabetes + methanolic extract (150 mg/kg bw)
2469.17 ± 252.67c
11.17 ± 0.44b
0.28 ± 0.03b,c
1.62 ± 0.29a
significance
P < 0.001
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
P < 0.003
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of Methanolic Extract
of C. auriculata Root on Oxidative
Stress Markers in Plasma and Muscle
There was a significantly
higher level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO)
in both the plasma and muscles in the diabeticrats compared to those
of control mice (Table ). However, the treatment of diabeticmice with metformin could effectively
lower the ROS and NO levels to the levels of controls and the methanolic
extract of the C. auriculata root reduced
these levels better than metformin. Further, the metformin and the C. auriculata root extract reduced the ROS and NO
levels and showed similarity with the control mice.
Table 6
Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Concentration of Oxidative Stress Markers in the Serum
and Muscle of Experimental GroupsA,B
ROS (μmol of DCF formed/min/mg protein)
NO (ng/mg protein)
plasma
muscle
plasma
muscle
control
2601.77 ± 182.88b
2595.56 ± 95.98a
3.86 ± 0.17b
2.59 ± 0.25a
diabetes
3347.69 ± 15.77c
3230.25 ± 44.56c
6.52 ± 0.56c
5.19 ± 0.47b
diabetes + metformin
2783.77 ± 106.92b
2842.57 ± 51.11b
3.85 ± 106.92b
1.98 ± 0.32a
diabetes + methanolic extract (150 mg/kg bw)
1496.69 ± 54.55a
2726.95 ± 42.97a,b
2.88 ± 54.55a
2.73 ± 0.23a
significance
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of the C. auriculata Root Extract on Plasma Insulin Levels
The plasma insulin levels of the different mice groups are represented
in Table . There was
a significantly lower level of plasma insulin in diabeticmice compared
to that of the control group (P < 0.001), whereas
the levels were similar to those of control mice in the C. auriculata root extract and metformin-treated
mice.
Table 7
Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Serum Concentration of
Insulin of Experimental GroupsA,B
insulin (μL U/mL)
control
0.65 ± 0.02a
diabetes
0.22 ± 0.01b
diabetes + metformin
0.68 ± 0.03a
diabetes + methanolic extract
0.71 ± 0.02a
significance
P < 0.001
Note: All of the
values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column
are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Note: All of the
values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column
are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Lipid Profile
There was a significant increase
in the plasma levels of triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein
(LDL), total cholesterol (TC), and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)
with a concomitant decrease in the plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein
(HDL) in diabeticmice, whereas these were normalized to the level
of control mice in the C. auriculata root extract and metformin-treated mice. In addition, the atherogenic
index, a new index to determine the alteration in the lipid profile,
was also found to be higher in diabeticmice compared to the mice
of other groups studied (Table ).
Table 8
Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Lipid Profile of Experimental
GroupsA,B
total cholesterol (mg/dL)
triglycerides (mg/dL)
HDL (mg/dL)
LDL (mg/dL)
VLDL (mg/dL)
AI
control
170.46 ± 8.22a
92.75 ± 2.28a
49.79 ± 2.15b
78.17 ± 2.86a
18.55 ± 0.46a
0.28 ± 0.03a
diabetes
276.11 ± 8.99c
219.56 ± 17.94b
30.67 ± 5.81a
153.80 ± 4.32c
43.91 ± 3.59b
0.87 ± 0.13b
diabetes + metformin
199.79 ± 5.36b
96.84 ± 1.79a
45.07 ± 4.67b
95.05 ± 2.46b
19.97 ± 0.66a
0.31 ± 0.05a
diabetes + methanolic extract
169.49 ± 5.39a
90.30 ± 7.62a
44.75 ± 2.48b
82.54 ± 3.59a
17.89 ± 1.19a
0.29 ± 0.04a
significance
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
P < 0.05
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
P < 0.001
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.Mean values with the same superscript
letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas
those with different superscript letters are significantly different
as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of the Methanolic
Extract of the C. auriculata Root on
Plasma Markers of Hepatic Damage
The treatment with the C. auriculata root extract maintained the normal
hepatic condition as there was a significant decrease in the activities
of plasma markers of hepatic damage, i.e., aspartate
aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline
phosphatase (ALP) in extract-treated diabeticmice compared to diabeticmice (Figure ). The
diabetic group mice showed a significant rise in the activities of
plasma ALP, AST, and ALT, indicating liver damage.
Figure 6
Vertical bar graphs showing
the activities of AST, ALT, and ALP in different experimental group
mice. AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase,
ALP: alkaline phosphatase. Note: All of the values are mean ±
SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given parameter
are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Vertical bar graphs showing
the activities of AST, ALT, and ALP in different experimental group
mice. AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase,
ALP: alkaline phosphatase. Note: All of the values are mean ±
SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given parameter
are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript
letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple
range test.
Effect
of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on Plasma Markers of Renal Damage
The diabetic group
mice showed a significant upsurge (P < 0.05) of
urea, BUN, uric acid, and creatinine levels in the plasma compared
to the control groups (Figure a,b). However, diabeticmice treated with the C. auriculata root extract and metformin showed significantly
lower plasma urea, BUN, uric acid, and creatinine levels, indicating
the attenuation of alteration in the plasma levels of renal markers
caused by diabetes.
Figure 7
(a and b) Vertical bar graphs showing the plasma concentration
of urea and BUN (a) and uric acid and creatinine (b) in different
experimental group mice. Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript letters are not significantly
different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly
different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
(a and b) Vertical bar graphs showing the plasma concentration
of urea and BUN (a) and uric acid and creatinine (b) in different
experimental group mice. Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.
Mean values with the same superscript letters are not significantly
different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly
different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Effect of the Methanolic
Extract of the C. auriculata Root on
the Histomorphology of Muscles
The histological architecture
in the diabetic group mice was altered compared to that of the normal
architecture in the control mice. The diabeticmice muscle histomorphology
showed the presence of mononucleated inflammatory cells and muscles
replaced by the adipose tissue with nonhomogeneous fiber size distribution
against homogeneous fiber size distribution in the control mice (Figure a,b). In addition,
in mice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root, homogenous fiber distribution
similar to that of control mice was observed (Figure c,d). This suggests that the ameliorative
efficacy of the methanolic extract against high-fat-diet plus STZ-induced
diabetic alterations in muscle histomorphology.
Figure 8
Photomicrographs of muscle
tissues of (a) control, (b) diabetic, (c) diabetic + metformin, (d)
diabetic + the methanolic-extract-treated mice. Note the presence
of mononucleated inflammatory cells (up-pointing bullet) and muscles
replaced by the adipose tissue with (down-pointing arrow) with nonhomogenous
fiber size distribution against homogeneous fiber size distribution
in control mice and metformin- as well as the methanolic extract of C. auriculata- treated diabetic mice muscle section.
Photomicrographs of muscle
tissues of (a) control, (b) diabetic, (c) diabetic + metformin, (d)
diabetic + the methanolic-extract-treated mice. Note the presence
of mononucleated inflammatory cells (up-pointing bullet) and muscles
replaced by the adipose tissue with (down-pointing arrow) with nonhomogenous
fiber size distribution against homogeneous fiber size distribution
in control mice and metformin- as well as the methanolic extract of C. auriculata- treated diabeticmice muscle section.
Discussion
The herbs
are used for medicinal purposes because of their less or no side effects.
The bioactives present in the herbs may be the reason for their health-benefiting
properties. However, the phytocomponents of the C.
auriculata root are not well known/understood. Hence,
this study investigated the total polyphenols as well as flavonoids
present in different solvent extracts and the antidiabetic activity
of the methanolic extract of the root both in in vitro and in vivo models. The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the highest amount of total
polyphenols, followed by aqueous, ethanol, and chloroform extracts
in the order mentioned. The HPLC profile of polyphenols showed that
coumaric acid in the methanolic extract, gallic acid in the chloroform
extract, and syringic acid in ethanolic and aqueous extracts are present
in the highest concentrations compared to other polyphenols present
in respective solvent extracts. Further, the flavonoid content was
also found to be highest in the methanolic extract compared to other
extracts studied. The methanolic extract was followed by ethanolic,
aqueous, and chloroform extracts. Furthermore, the results of this
study revealed that the antioxidant potency of the methanolic extract
was high, with the least IC50 value (42.87 ± 1.51
μg/mL), followed by ethanol, aqueous, and chloroform extracts
compared to the standard. The potent methanolic extract, among four
extracts studied, showed antidiabetic properties both in vitro and in vivo.The methanolic extract reduced
the hyperglycemia in the high-fat-diet-fed + STZ-injected type-2 diabetic
C57BL/6 mice (T2D mice), suggesting the hypoglycemic/antidiabetic
property. The administration of a high-fat diet + STZ injection resulted
in a decrease in the body weight, an increase in the fasting blood
glucose level, the concentration of ROS and NO in the plasma and muscles,
with a concomitant decrease in the plasma insulin and activities of
antioxidant enzymes. The above results are further authenticated by
the alteration in the normal architecture of the muscle tissue in
the diabeticmice compared to other control mice. Further, there was
a significant increase in the activities of plasma AST, ALT, and ALP
as well as the plasma concentration of urea, uric acid, and BUN in
the high-fat-diet-fed diabeticmice compared to control mice. The
levels of plasma TC, TG, LDL, VLDL, and the atherogenic index were
found to be elevated significantly, with a significant decrease in
the HDL level in T2D mice compared to control. However, the administration
of 150 mg/kg body weight of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root for 8 weeks could normalize the
condition to the level of control. This indicates that the C. auriculata root extract act as an antidiabetic
agent.Several studies have reported that the health-promoting
properties of medicinal herbs are due to the presence of different
bioactives.[13] Hence, the identification
and characterization of bioactives or phytoconstituents of herbs have
become a major topic of various studies. In this investigation, the
root of C. auriculata was subjected
to different solvent extractions in the order of increasing polarity
and it was found that the methanolic extract could extract the highest
amount of total polyphenols compared to other solvents. Indeed, studies
have shown that polar solvents could extract the maximum amount of
polyphenols.[14] Further, the flavonoids
were also found to be highest in the methanolic extract. In addition
to the estimation of total polyphenols from different solvent extracts,
the different polyphenols present were also determined in this study.
The different solvent extracts were subjected to HPLC analysis, and
it was found that methanolic, chloroform, and ethanol and aqueous
extracts were rich in coumaric acid, gallic acid, and syringic acid,
respectively. In addition, researchers are reporting alternate natural
sources of polyphenols with high bioavailability;[15] indeed, the results of our study showed that the C. auriculata root is also an alternate source for
polyphenols.The imbalance between the antioxidant and pro-oxidant
levels results in oxidative stress, and antioxidants scavenge the
free radicals to reduce the oxidative stress. In this study, to determine
the antioxidant potential of different solvent extracts of the root,
DPPH and FRAP assays were performed. The results of the DPPH assay
revealed that the methanolic extract showed better antioxidant activity
compared to other extracts and standard. This was further confirmed
by the FRAP assay, which showed a similar pattern of the result. The
earlier studies had shown that C. auriculata leaves[10] and flowers[2,8] have
antioxidant properties. However, the methanolic extract in this study
showed the least IC50 value of about 42.87 ± 1.51
μg/mL for the DPPH assay and 47.13 ± 0.37 μg/mL for
the FRAP assay. This may be because of the highest polyphenol content,
as polyphenols are known for their antioxidant potential.[16,17] It is further confirmed by FTIR analyses, the results of which revealed
that the methanolic extract has a broader peak at 3300 cm–1, range which indicates the presence of −OH groups.Hyperglycemia is the hallmark of the diabetic condition.[18] Hyperglycemia for prolonged periods results
in diabetes and its associated secondary complications like diabetic
nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, etc. Hence, maintaining the near-normoglycemic condition
is a dire need in a diabeticpatient. The blood glucose level increases
soon after the digestion of food and the absorption of monomers; hence,
the inhibition of oligo/polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzymes, viz., α-amylase and α-glucosidase, could delay
the hydrolysis of polysaccharides. In this study, the methanolic extract
of the C. auriculata root, the potent
extracts among all the extracts studied, suppressed the activities
of hydrolyzing enzymes, suggesting potency in reducing the hyperglycemic
condition.Based on the results of in vitro antioxidant and in vitro antidiabetic properties
of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root, a study was designed to evaluate the same in vivo in a diabeticmice model. In this study, a high-fat diet was fed
with a small single dose of streptozotocin to induce type-2 diabetes
in C57BL/6 mice. A high-fat diet for 11 weeks induces insulin resistance
and a small dose of streptozotocin decreases the plasma insulin levels
and, in turn, increases blood glucose, providing a diabetic model
to study the efficacy of herbs. The T2D mice showed a significant
increase in fasting blood glucose and decreased plasma insulin levels
which indicates that the mice were diabetic and developed insulin
resistance. The decrease in the plasma insulin despite a high-fat
diet maybe because of the fact that in a diabetic condition, the prolonged
insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinaemia sends negative
signals to the pancreatic β-cell to stop insulin production
as there are increased levels of plasma insulin. A similar mechanism
is mimicked in this animal model where a high-fat diet for 11 weeks
induces insulin resistance and a small dose of STZ injection decreases
the insulin level immediately but maintains the insulin resistance
to develop a type-2 diabetic model. These results are in agreement
with earlier results.[19] However, the diabeticmice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the above parameters similar
to those of control mice, indicating the amelioration or management
of the diabetic condition.The body weight of all the T2D mice
was increased over control mice in this study. After STZ induction,
the body weight of diabeticmice decreased compared to other group
mice. This may be because in the diabetic condition, the muscle protein
is degraded to provide amino acids as substrates for gluconeogenesis[20] as the decreased level of insulin due to STZ-induced
diabetes cannot transfer glucose into the cells and utilize the same.
However, it has been mentioned earlier that insulin and glucose levels
were normalized to the level of control mice in metformin and extract-treated
mice and hence the body weight is not reduced as there may be increased
glucose uptake and thereby reduced gluconeogenesis in treated diabeticmice.The plasma lipid profile of T2D mice was altered in this
study compared to other groups mice. These results are similar to
those of earlier studies where Holmes et al.[21] reported that high-fat-diet-fed rats showed increased plasma TG
and TC levels. Studies reported that diabetes increases hepatic TG.[22] The increased amount of TG leads to the accumulation
of fats and causes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.[23] Increased levels of LDL-C and TG have been proven to contribute
to the development of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.[24,25] Indeed, in this study, there is a significant increase in the plasma
levels of TG and LDL, which might lead to cardiovascular diseases.
In recent years, the lipid profile alteration has been determined
by the atherogenic index. The atherogenic index of plasma is a logarithmically
transformed ratio of TG and HDL-C. It is considered as an indicator
of dyslipidemia and associated diseases.[26] The atherogenic index of diabeticmice in this study is significantly
high compared to control, metformin, and extract-treated mice, indicating
a significant damage/alteration in the diabeticmice, which may lead
to cardiovascular diseases. This is because the atherogenic index
is linked with cardiovascular diseases.[27]It is well established that as a secondary complication, diabetes
is associated with dysfunction or damage in other organs. In this
study, the activities of plasma AST, ALT, and ALP were elevated in
the T2D mice than in control group mice. The elevated AST, ALT, and
ALP activities indicate liver dysfunction. Earlier studies have reported
that in the diabetic condition the liver function biomarkers such
as ALT, AST, and ALP elevate,[9] with which
our study is also in line. However, the diabeticmice administered
with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C.
auriculata root showed the plasma AST, ALT, and ALP
activities comparable to those of control mice.Similarly, kidney
dysfunction was also observed only in diabeticmice in this study
as reported by previous studies. For instance, Nambirajan et al.[9] showed significantly increased levels of urea
and creatinine, indicating kidney damage in diabeticrats. The prolonged
hyperglycemia in the diabetic condition is known to damage the kidney
and leads to diabetic nephropathy. As an indication of kidney dysfunction,
there was a significant increase in the plasma concentration of urea,
BUN, uric acid, and creatinine in diabeticmice compared to control
and metformin- and extract-treated diabeticmice.In addition
to the elevated fasting blood glucose levels, decreased plasma insulin
levels, and alterations in the lipid profile as characteristic features
of diabetes, oxidative stress is also associated with diabetes. Hyperglycemia
is known to generate reactive oxygen species, which in turn cause
oxidative stress.[28] In the present study,
there was a significant increase in the levels of oxidative stress
markers, i.e., ROS and NO, in both the plasma and
muscles with a concomitant decrease in the activities of antioxidant
enzymes SOD and CAT in the T2D mice compared to control mice. However,
mice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed an increase in the activities
of SOD and CAT in the plasma and muscles, confirming the antioxidant
property of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root. The oxidative stress in the muscle tissue is further supported
by the deleterious alteration in the histological architecture of
the muscle in diabeticmice as there was a deposition of fat and infiltration
of leukocytes, indicating inflammation or damage to the tissue.Based on the results obtained, a possible mechanism of action is
derived as follows. It is well established that feeding with a high-fat
diet develops insulin resistance,[29] a model
for the type-2-diabetic studies. However, recently, an alternate model
wherein a high-fat diet fed for 2–3 months with a single dose
(60 mg/kg body weight) of STZ would develop a suitable type-2 diabetic
model.[10] The high-fat diet alters lipid
metabolism and develops insulin resistance. The intraperitoneal injection
of STZ further alters the insulin level and glucose absorption, resulting
in a suitable condition for type-2 diabetes. In this study, a significant
increase in fasting blood glucose and a decrease in plasma insulin
indicate the induction of insulin resistance after a high-fat diet
+ STZ injection. This further resulted in the development of the diabetic
condition. As a secondary complication of diabetes, there was a significant
damage/disruption in the liver and kidney function. Insulin plays
a vital role in glucose absorption through glucose transporter (Glut).
Glut 4 is an insulin-dependent glut transporters present in the muscle
and adipose tissue. Because of insulin resistance and decreased plasma
insulin levels, the glut transporters present in muscle cannot function
normally, hence altering the function or physiology of the muscle.
Altered physiology in muscle further resulted in oxidative stress
as evident by increased concentration of ROS and NO with a significant
decrease in the activities of SOD and CAT in the muscle. Further,
the polyphenol-rich methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root could manage the alterations due to high-fat diet + STZ-induced
diabetes similar to that of metformin. This may be because of its
rich −OH groups and an efficacy to increase the insulin sensitization
as the plasma insulin levels were similar to the levels of control
mice in extract-treated mice.To conclude, the methanolic extract
of the C. auriculata root had the highest
amount of polyphenols and flavonoids and was rich in −OH groups
with potent antioxidant and antidiabetic properties in vitro. The methanolic extract also managed the type-2 diabetic condition
to the level of controls. The mechanism of action of the extract may
be by increasing the insulin secretion as well as sensitivity in extract-treated
diabeticmice.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
All the analytical and laboratory-grade chemicals
were supplied by Rankem (Bangalore, India), whereas HPLC-grade chemicals,
standards, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for
insulin were procured from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Private Limited
(Bangalore, India). Kits for biochemical analyses of plasma were procured
from Agappe Diagnostic Limited (Bangalore, India).
Procurement and Processing of the C. auriculata Root
The root of the C. auriculata plant was collected from Chandravana botanical garden, maintained
by Mysore Medical College, Mysuru. After the collection of the plant,
it was authenticated by a botany expert, and the voucher number of
the herbarium submitted is UOMBOT20CA17. The root was rinsed thoroughly
in distilled water and alcohol, shade-dried, coarsely powdered in
a hammer mill, and stored in a sealed container at −20 °C
until further use.
Defatting of the Samples
The processed C. auriculata root
was defatted by the cold extraction method. Briefly, 10 g of the coarsely
powdered C. auriculata root sample
was taken in a conical flask with a stopper and extracted with 100
mL of hexane at room temperature for 8 h. Then, the extract was filtered
using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the residual defatted powder
was evaporated and then stored in airtight container at −20
°C.
Solvent Extraction of Total Polyphenols
The total polyphenols were extracted using different solvents with
increasing polarity, viz., chloroform, ethanol, methanol,
and water. Briefly, 10 g of defatted root sample was taken in a stopper
conical flask along with 100 mL of respective solvents. The conical
flasks were kept at room temperature in a rotary shaker for 8 h. Later,
the extracts were filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, evaporated
using a rotary evaporator, and stored at −20 °C until
further analyses.
Estimation of Total Polyphenols
and Flavonoids
The estimation of total polyphenols, and flavonoids
was performed according to the methods of McDonald et al.[30] and Chang et al.[31] respectively, for different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root.
HPLC
Analysis of Polyphenols in Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata Root
The polyphenol extracts
of defatted samples of the C. auriculata root were subjected to HPLC analysis using the protocol of Govardhan
Singh et al.[32] in a Shimadzu LC-10AVp (Gradient
System PDA, RID, UV) system on a reversed-phase C18 column (250 ×
4.6 mm2, Phenomenex). Different polyphenols in the different
extracts of the C. auriculata root
were identified and quantified by comparing with those of the standard
peaks.
FTIR Analysis of Polyphenolic Extracts of
the C. auriculata Root
The
different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root were subjected to FTIR analysis to determine the functional
groups present. Briefly, FTIR spectra were recorded at a resolution
of 2 cm–1 in the range of 400–4000 cm–1.
Biological Activities of
Polyphenol-Rich Extracts of the C. auriculata Root
In Vitro Antioxidant Activities
DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity
Free radical
scavenging activity was investigated using DPPH assay as described
by Rakholiya et al.[33] In brief, 150 μL
of different concentrations of ascorbic acid (standard) and solvent
extracts was taken in different test tubes; 2 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH in
methanol was added; the total volume was made up to 3 mL with methanol,
and the solution was mixed thoroughly and incubated for 30 min in
dark; and the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm against the blank.
The percentage of radical scavenging activity was calculated using
the following formula: DPPH radical scavenging ability (%) = [{(Absref
– Abssam)/Absref} × 100], and the samples were compared
by calculating IC50 values.
FRAP
Ferric reducing antioxidant power was measured following the method
of Jeong et al.[34] About 8.5 mL of the reaction
mixture consisting of 1 mL of different concentrations of the standard
(ascorbic acid) and solvent extracts was mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2
M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6), and 2.5 mL of 1% of potassium ferricyanide
[K3Fe(CN)6] was thoroughly mixed and incubated
for 30 min at 50 °C. About 2.5 mL of 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic
acid was added, and the solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10
min. Last, 2.5 mL of the supernatant was taken and diluted with the
same amount of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) ferric chloride.
The absorbance was measured at 700 nm, and an increase in the absorbance
of the reaction mixture indicates increasing reducing power.
In Vitro Antidiabetic Activities
α-Amylase Inhibitory Assay
The α-amylase
inhibitory effect of different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root was analysed by the method described
by Hemalatha et al.[35] with slight changes.
Briefly, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) containing 6.7 mM sodium
chloride was prepared, and porcine pancreatic α-amylase and
1% (w/v) starch solution was prepared using the above buffer. Different
concentrations of extracts were taken, to which 500 μL of starch
was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min.
About 50 μL of porcine pancreatic amylase (0.15 unit/mL) was
added to initiate the reaction and was incubated for 30 min at 37
°C. Then, 1 mL of dinitro salicylic acid reagent (1 g of DNSA,
30 g of Rochelle salt was dissolved in 20 mL of 2 N sodium hydroxide
and made up to 100 mL with distilled water) was added to all test
tubes and incubated for 5 min in boiling water to terminate the reaction.
Test tubes were cooled to room temperature and diluted with 5 mL of
water, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Acarbose (1 mg/mL)
was used as a positive control. The α-amylase inhibitory activity
of the extract was calculated using the following formula:Based on the percentage of inhibition
of the enzyme activity, IC50 values were calculated and
the inhibitory effect of the extract was compared with that of the
standard.
α-Glucosidase
Inhibition Assay
The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root was tested for its inhibitory
activity against rat intestinal α-glucosidase using 4-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside as a substrate according to the method reported
by Hemalatha et al.[35] The reaction mixture
containing 0.6 mL of 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 0.25 mL of
3 mM 4-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, and 0.1 mL
of the sample at various concentrations was prepared and incubated
for 5 min at 37 °C. About 0.25 mL of the α-glucosidase
solution (0.15 U/mL) was added to initiate the reaction; it was incubated
at 37 °C for 40 min. Then, 0.25 mL of 0.67 M sodium carbonate
solution was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was recorded
at 405 nm. Acarbose was used as a positive control. The percentage
of α-glucosidase inhibition was calculated by the following
formula:Based on the percentage of inhibition of the
enzyme activity, the IC50 value of the methanolic extract
was calculated, and the inhibitory effect of the extract was compared
with that of the standard.
Animal
Maintenance
Six week-old male C57BL/6 mice were used in this
experiment and maintained at 22 ± 2 °C temperature, 55 ±
5% humidity, and 12-h light/dark cycle. The animals were given food
and water ad libitum. The animals were maintained
at the Animal House Facility, Vipragen Biosciences Private Limited,
Mysore, and acclimatized for 1 week before the commencement of the
experiment. All the protocols and procedures were approved by the
Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (VIP-IAEC-206-2020), and CPCSEA
guidelines were followed throughout the experiment.
Experimental Design
After acclimatization, animals
were divided into two sets: the first set (n = 5)
is control (group 1) with AIN 93 diet (Table ) and the second set (n =
15) received a high-fat diet (Table ) for 8 weeks, followed by a single small dose of streptozotocin
(60 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.5)
and 5% of sucrose solution for 24 h. After 5 days, fasting blood glucose
(FBG) levels were measured and it was confirmed that second group
mice were with FBG levels ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). Then, the
second set of mice were divided into three groups, viz., group 2: diabetic (positive control), group 3: diabetic + metformin
(102.74 mg/kg bw) (standard group) (the human dose: 500 mg is converted
into mouse dose using “DoseCal” calculator of Janhavi
et al.[36]), and group 4: diabetic + the
methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root (150 mg/kg bw) (treatment group). The treatment of metformin
and the methanolic extract of root of C. auriculata was given for 8 weeks, and the mice were maintained with the AIN
93 diet. After the last treatment, mice were fasted overnight, euthanized
and blood and muscle samples were collected. The blood was centrifuged
at 3500 rpm for 10 min, and the plasma obtained as the supernatant
was separated. The muscle sample was stored in 10% formalin for the
histological study. The remaining muscle and plasma were stored at
−20 °C until further use.
Table 9
Composition
and Energy of AIN 93M and High-Fat Diets
ingredients
AIN 93M diet (g)
energy (kcal)
high-fat diet (g)
energy (kcal)
casein
180
690.66
180
690.66
sucrose
100
389.5
100
389.5
corn starch
550
141.21
270
69.48
oil
70
18.01
0
0
cellulose
50
0
50
0
minerals
35
0
35
0
vitamins
10
0
10
0
choline
2
0
2
0
l-cystine
3
0
3
0
lard
0
0
350
3150
total
1000
1239.38
1000
4299.64
Biochemical Analyses
All the plasma biochemical analyses
(lipid profiling, liver, and renal function tests) were performed
using kits of Agappe Diagnostic Limited, Kerala, India.
Oxidative Stress Marker in the Plasma and Muscles
The
ROS and NO in the plasma and muscles were estimated according to Black
and Brandt[37] and Green et al.,[38] respectively, with slight modifications, i.e., the muscle tissue was homogenized in 0.32 M sucrose.The ROS generation was measured by incubating the reaction aliquot
consisting of 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer, the sample, and DCF-DA
for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was read with
an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 525
nm. The values are expressed as μmol DCF formed/min/mg protein.For the measurement of NO generation, the sample was incubated
with the Griess reagent for 10 min at room temperature in dark and
read at 540 nm. The values are expressed as ng of NO generated/mg
protein.
Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes in the
Plasma and Muscles
The activities of antioxidant enzymes,
SOD[39] and CAT,[40] in the plasma and muscles were determined according to the standard
protocols with slight modifications, i.e., the muscle
tissue was homogenized in 0.32 M sucrose.For the determination
of the activity of SOD, to 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer of pH 8.2,
the enzyme sample and 0.2 mM pyrogallol were added and monitored at
420 nm for 2 min for the autoxidation of pyrogallol with and without
the presence of sample in the reaction mixture. The quantity of enzyme
used to inhibit 50% of autoxidation of pyrogallol is considered as
1 unit. The specific activity was expressed as U/mg protein.The activity of catalase was determined. Briefly, to the 1 mL reaction
mixture, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), the enzyme sample, and 8.8
mM H2O2 were added. The reaction was monitored
at 240 nm for 3 min, and the change in absorbance was recorded for
every 30 s. The activity of catalase was expressed as nmol/min/mg
protein.
Histopathology
The muscle tissue
was removed from the animals and fixed in buffered formaldehyde (10%
v/v). After dehydrating with a graded ethanol solution, the tissue
was embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 5 μm thickness were
taken in a microtome, mounted on glass slides, deparaffinized in xylene
and stained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The slides were observed
under a light microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Germany) and
analyzed for the recovery of damages caused due to high blood glucose
by the treatment of metformin and the methanolic extract of root of C. auriculata.
Statistical
Analysis
All results are expressed as mean ± standard
error (SE). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed, followed
by the posthoc Duncan test to identify significant differences (P < 0.05) using the SPSS software 17.0. The significant
difference (P < 0.05) between the standard and
the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root in in vitro anti-diabetic assay was determined
by Student’s t-test.