| Literature DB >> 33458481 |
Hongjie Zhao1,2, Ran Wang2, Huizhen Deng2, Lijun Zhang2, Lili Gao2, Lexin Zhang2, Tifeng Jiao1,2.
Abstract
In this work, a new nanocomposite based on octa-amino polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and chitosan (CS) was synthesized and used for wastewater treatment. The properties and morphologies of the prepared composite were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscope, thermogravimetric, and atomic force microscopy. The results showed that POSS, CNTs, and CS formed a stable composite through intermolecular forces, and the modification of CS by POSS and CNTs improved its stability. In addition, the obtained composite showed good adsorption performance for the degradation of methyl orange and Congo red dyes. The pseudo-first-order model and pseudo-second-order model were used to analyze the adsorption data, and the results showed that the adsorption process conforms to the kinetic model. Moreover, the maximum adsorption capacity of the composite to methyl orange and Congo red reached 63.23 and 314.97 mg/g, respectively. This work provides new ideas for the preparation of self-assembled multi-composite and their potential applications in wastewater treatment.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33458481 PMCID: PMC7807773 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) Molecular structure of POSS and (b) schematic illustration of the synthesis of POSS-CNTs-CS composite.
Figure 2(a) SEM image and (b, c) AFM images of POSS particles.
Figure 3(a) TEM image of the prepared POSS-CNTs-CS composite and (b) FT-IR results of the samples.
Figure 4(a) XRD patterns and (b) TG curves of the samples.
Figure 5(a, b) SEM images and (c–f) elemental mappings of the prepared POSS-CNTs-CS composite.
Kinetic Parameters of the Composite and Chitosan Adsorbed MO or CR
| pseudo-first-order
model | pseudo-second-order
model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dye | composite and chitosan absorbed MO or CR | ||||||
| MO | CS | 22.43 | 0.992 | 0.07038 | 25.70 | 0.985 | 0.00250 |
| POSS-CNTs-CS | 63.23 | 0.943 | 0.29918 | 69.88 | 0.999 | 0.00442 | |
| CR | CS | 167.89 | 0.981 | 0.00899 | 178.57 | 0.981 | 0.00012 |
| POSS-CNTs-CS | 314.97 | 0.891 | 0.17814 | 341.30 | 0.999 | 0.00080 | |
Figure 6Kinetic adsorption of (a) q versus t plots and (b) t/q versus t plots for MO; (c) q versus t plots and (d) t/qt versus t plots for CR.
Comparison of the Adsorption Capacity of the Composite to MO and CR Dye
| adsorbent | dye | adsorption capacity (mg/g) | references |
|---|---|---|---|
| PbS/ZnO | MO | 159 | [[ |
| ZnFe2O4/graphene | MO | 2.31 | [[ |
| chitosan/organic rectorite composite | MO | 5.56 | [[ |
| polyaniline nano-adsorbent | MO | 75.9 | [[ |
| hexagonal-shaped nanoporous carbon | MO | 18.8 | [[ |
| modified fly ash with Ca(OH)2/Na2FeO4 | MO | 23.8 | [[ |
| graphene oxide | MO | 16.83 | [[ |
| biochar adsorbent | MO | 39.37 | [[ |
| m-CS/c-Fe2O3/MWCNTs | MO | 31.52 | [[ |
| PVA/MF | CR | 221.43 | [[ |
| CS/CTAB | CR | 352.5 | [[ |
| CS-VTM | CR | 62.2 | [[ |
| Sn(II)-BDC MOF | CR | 95.2 | [[ |
| ZnFe2O4/MgAl-LDH | CR | 294.12 | [[ |