| Literature DB >> 33457431 |
Takahiro Ogura1, Hiroki Sakai1, Shigehiro Asai1, Hideaki Fukuda1, Tatsuya Takahashi1, Izumi Kanisawa1, Ichiro Yamaura1, Akihiro Tsuchiya1, Michael Forney2, Carl S Winalski2, Kenji Takahashi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the optimal treatment for displaced, purely chondral fragments in the knee.Entities:
Keywords: bone peg; cartilage; chondral fracture; chondral fragment; fixation
Year: 2020 PMID: 33457431 PMCID: PMC7787012 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120963050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Patient and Lesion Characteristics (N = 6)
| Bone Pegs | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Age, y; Sex | BMI, kg/m2 | Cause/Sport | Time to Surgery, mo | Location of Injury | Insall-Salvati Index, deg | Femoral Sulcus Angle, deg | Chondral Lesion Area, cm2 | No. | Diameter/Length, mm |
| 1 | 12; male | 16.5 | Trauma/basketball | 4.9 | Lateral trochlea | 1.3 | 138 | 6 | 4 | 2.5/15 |
| 2 | 16; male | 17.8 | Osteochondritis dissecans /basketball | 1.1 | Posterior lateral femoral condyle | — | — | 0.8 | 2 | 2.7/15 |
| 3 | 14; male | 18.0 | Trauma/soccer | 2.8 | Lateral trochlea | 1.2 | 136 | 3 | 5 | 2.5/18 |
| 4 | 11; female | 15.3 | Trauma/basketball | 0.5 | Medial trochlea | 1.4 | 128 | 0.8 | 2 | 2.0/15 |
| 5 | 11; male | 17.8 | Trauma/basketball | 0.6 | Lateral trochlea | 1.1 | 134 | 9 | 4 | 2.1/12 |
| 6 | 11; female | 15.1 | Trauma/basketball | 0.4 | Medial trochlea | 1.3 | 133 | 3 | 3 | 3/17 |
All patients had open physes. BMI, body mass index. Dash indicates not applicable.
Figure 1.Preoperative reconstructed computed tomography (CT) scans (representative patient 3). (A) Front and (B) anterior oblique plane CT views show no bony fragment in the knee joint.
Figure 2.Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (representative patient 3). (A) Sagittal and (B) axial plane MRI scans show a cartilage defect in the lateral femoral condyle (marked by arrow). (C) Sagittal and (D) axial MRI scans show the displaced chondral fragment (marked by arrow) lying posterior to the anterior cruciate ligament.
Figure 3.Preoperative arthroscopic findings (representative patient 3). (A) Cartilage defect with fibrous tissue over the subchondral bone. (B) Chondral fragment.
Figure 4.Bone pegs harvested from the anterior border of the ipsilateral tibia.
Figure 5.Chondral fragment fixation (representative patient 3). (A) The cartilage defect was debrided, and (B) the chondral fragment was fixed using impaction of the bone pegs.
Figure 6.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results 3 months postoperatively (representative patient 3). Sagittal plane MRI scan shows no violation of the distal femoral physes by the bone pegs (arrow).
Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
| KOOS Subscale Scores | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Time to evaluation, y | Lysholm Score | Pain | Symptoms | ADL | Sports/Recreation | QOL |
| 1 | 10.9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 3 | 1.8 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 94 |
| 4 | 9.2 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 6 | 1.9 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
ADL, Activities of Daily Living; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; QOL, Quality of Life.
Figure 7.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results at 5 years postoperatively (representative patient 3). (A) Sagittal and (B) axial plane MRI scans show good healing of the fixed chondral fragment into the lateral femoral condyle (marked by arrow). The MOCART score was 95. MOCART, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue.
Characteristics of the Repaired Cartilage (MOCART Score)
| Patient | Time of MRI After Surgery, y | Degree of Defect Repair and Filling of the Defect | Integration to Border Zone | Surface of the Repair Tissue | Structure of the Repair Tissue | Signal Intensity of the Repair Tissue | Subchondral Lamina | Subchondral Bone | Adhesions | Effusion | Total MOCART Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2 | Complete | Complete | Intact | Homogeneous | Isointense | Not intact | Not intact | No | Absent | 90 |
| 2 | 1.0 | Complete | Complete | Intact | Homogeneous | Isointense | Not intact | Not intact | No | Absent | 90 |
| 3 | 5.0 | Complete | Complete | Intact | Homogeneous | Isointense | Not intact | Intact | No | Absent | 95 |
| 4 | 3.9 | Incomplete, >50% | Complete | Intact | Homogeneous | Isointense | Not intact | Not intact | No | Absent | 80 |
| 6 | 1.9 | Incomplete, >50% | Complete | Damaged <50% of the depth | Homogeneous | Isointense | Not intact | Not intact | No | Absent | 70 |
MOCART, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 8.Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results of the patient with a failed chondral fixation (patient 5). (A) Preoperative MRI scan shows cartilage delamination in the lateral trochlear groove with the chondral fragment remaining within the defect. (B) Postoperative MRI scan at 3 months shows small cysts beneath the fixed chondral fragment. (C) Cystlike lesions enlarged at 8 months. (D) MRI scan at 1 year shows a high signal line between the fixed chondral fragment and underlying subchondral bone. (E) At 15 months postoperatively, the repaired chondral fragment had completely detached and displaced. (F) After the subsequent drilling procedure, the defect was covered with repair tissue (3 years after chondral fixation but 1.9 years after drilling).