| Literature DB >> 33457210 |
Reinier Alvarez1,2,3, Panagiotis Mastorakos3,4, Prashant Chittiboina1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conus medullaris tumors are rare, as the majority of all spinal cord tumors occur in the cervical and thoracic regions. Hemangioblastomas of the spinal cord account for 3%-4% of all intramedullary spinal cord tumors and can be sporadic or associated with von Hippel-Lindau disease. There are only fourteen cases of conus medullaris hemangioblastomas published in the literature, herein we present the fifteenth. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 44-year old male with von Hippel Lindau disease presented with worsening bilateral lower extremity weakness, gait imbalance as well as absent perineal and genital sensation with weak voluntary anal contraction. MRI demonstrated multiple stable spinal tumors and a 6 mm conus medullaris hemangioblastoma with growth and a new peri-tumoral cyst. The patient underwent uncomplicated surgical resection with appreciable improvement in perineal sensation and sphincteric control during post-operative course.Entities:
Keywords: Conus medullaris; Hemangioblastoma; Intramedullary spinal cord tumor; Von Hippel Lindau
Year: 2020 PMID: 33457210 PMCID: PMC7806181 DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2020.100904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Neurosurg ISSN: 2214-7519
Fig. 1.VHL – associated hemangioblastoma of the conus medullaris. (A) Whole spine sagittal T1 post-contrast MRI demonstrates numerous enhancing lesions involving the spinal cord and cauda equina. (B) Sagittal and axial T1 post-contrast MRI of the thoracic spine demonstrate intraparenchymal conus medullaris lesion (red arrow). (C) Sagittal T2 thoracic MRIs over a 2-year interval demonstrate development of a peri-tumoral cyst (red arrow) at the conus medullaris. (D) Intra-operative microscopic view of hemangioblastoma. Asterisk depicts dorsal root entry zone.
Literature review.
| Conus Medullaris Hemangioblastoma | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author & Year | Age (yrs), Sex | Location | VHL | Post-Operative Condition |
| 0.5, F | T12-L1 | − | No deficits | |
| 44, F | T11-L2 | Unknown | Improved | |
| 65, M | T12-L1 | Unknown | Improved | |
| 30, M | T12-L1 | + | — | |
| 21, F | T12 | − | Improved | |
| Roonprapunt et al. 2003 | 31, F | T12-L1 | − | Unchanged |
| 27, F | T11-L1 | − | Unchanged | |
| 29, M | T12-L1 | + | Worse (new paraparesis) | |
| 27, F | T12 | + | Improved | |
| 24, F | T12-L1 | − | Improved | |
| 74, M | T12-L1 | Unknown | Improved | |
| 57, M | L1-L2 | Unknown | Unchanged | |
| 61, M | T12-L1 | Unknown | Unchanged | |
| 37, F | T12-L1 | Unknown | Worse (neurogenic bladder) | |
| – | – | Unknown | Improved | |