Literature DB >> 33457123

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Use of a Virtual Decisional Aid to Improve Knowledge and Patient Satisfaction in Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy.

Lee Varelas1, Francesco M Egro1, Nicole Evankovich1, Vu Nguyen1.   

Abstract

Background The decisional process of navigating breast reconstruction surgery is very challenging for patients with a breast cancer diagnosis. This study aims to assess the impact of a virtual breast reconstruction decision aid program on the decision-making process of breast cancer patients considering breast reconstruction.  Methods A two-arm, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh. Patients were blindly assigned to one of two arms: Emmi Decide (Emmi Solutions LLC, Chicago, IL) program prior to traditional consultation (intervention) and traditional consultation alone (control). All patients completed a baseline pre- and post-intervention questionnaire to evaluate knowledge, patient satisfaction, and psychological status. Surgeons' satisfaction and consultation time were also recorded. Results A total of 26 patients participated in the study (n=13 in each arm). Patients in the intervention group reported a greater BREAST-Q reconstruction module score (control=47.9±8.2, intervention=56.8±4.2, p=0.0017), lower decisional conflict scale score (control=30.2±11.8, intervention=14.5±8.8, p=0.017), and improved patient knowledge (control=70.8±15.5%, intervention=83.1±13.8%, p=0.018). No difference was noted in consultation time (control=51.0±7.8 min, intervention=47.8±13.7 min, p=0.46) and psychological testing (control=49.7±16.0, intervention=44.6±15.2, p=0.26). However, surgeons reported greater satisfaction with their consultations with interventional group participants (control=3.4±0.7, intervention=4.8±0.4, p=0.000056). Conclusions The use of a virtual decisional aid program to assist the decision-making of breast reconstruction patients was shown to significantly benefit both patients and surgeons, by improving patient knowledge and satisfaction without placing an additional psychological burden on them. This supports the notion that this resource is a promising tool that can improve the difficult process of breast reconstruction in the vulnerable population of breast cancer patients.
Copyright © 2020, Varelas et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast reconstruction; decisional aid; mastectomy; patient knowledge; patient satisfaction; surgeon satisfaction; virtual decisional aid

Year:  2020        PMID: 33457123      PMCID: PMC7797415          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  13 in total

1.  Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Lisa Newman; Jennifer J Griggs; Mary Ann Kosir; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Wanjing Chen; Xiaoai Lv; Xiaohong Xu; Xiufei Gao; Bei Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.239

3.  The Effect of Web-Based Education on Patient Satisfaction, Consultation Time and Conversion to Surgery.

Authors:  David J Boudreault; Chin-Shang Li; Michael S Wong
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy W T Lam; Miranda Chan; Amy Or; Ava Kwong; Dacita Suen; Richard Fielding
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Chinese women's preferences and concerns regarding incision location for breast augmentation surgery: a survey of 216 patients.

Authors:  Jingjing Sun; Chunjun Liu; Dali Mu; Keming Wang; Sainan Zhu; Yi He; Jie Luan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Natalie Causarano; Jennica Platt; Nancy N Baxter; Shaghayegh Bagher; Jennifer M Jones; Kelly A Metcalfe; Stefan O P Hofer; Anne C O'Neill; Terry Cheng; Elizabeth Starenkyj; Toni Zhong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Mental health, loneliness, and illness perception outcomes in quality of life among young breast cancer patients after mastectomy: the role of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ioanna Fanakidou; Sofia Zyga; Victoria Alikari; Maria Tsironi; John Stathoulis; Paraskevi Theofilou
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  A survey of patient comprehension of readily accessible online educational material regarding plastic surgery procedures.

Authors:  Ian C Hoppe; Naveen K Ahuja; Michael J Ingargiola; Mark S Granick
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates.

Authors:  A Frisell; J Lagergren; J de Boniface
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ekaterina Tiourin; Natalie Barton; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.