Neodymium and dysprosium can be efficiently separated by solvent extraction, using the neutral extractant Cyanex 923, if the conventional aqueous feed phase is largely replaced by the green polar organic solvent polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG 200). While pure aqueous and pure PEG 200 solutions in the presence of LiCl or HCl were not able to separate the two rare earth elements, high separation factors were observed when extraction was performed from PEG 200 chloride solutions with addition of small amounts of water. This addition of water bridges the gap between traditional hydrometallurgy and novel solvometallurgy and overcomes the challenges faced in both methods. The effect of different variables was investigated: water content, chloride concentration, type of chloride salt, Cyanex 923 concentration, scrubbing agent. A Job plot revealed the extraction stoichiometry is DyCl3·4L, where L is Cyanex 923. The McCabe-Thiele diagram for dysprosium extraction showed that complete extraction of this metal can be achieved by a 3-stage counter-current solvent extraction process, leaving neodymium behind in the raffinate. Finally, a conceptual flow sheet for the separation of neodymium and dysprosium including extraction, scrubbing, stripping, and regeneration steps was presented. The nonaqueous solvent extraction process presented in this paper can contribute to efficient recycling of rare earths from end-of-life neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets.
Neodymium and dysprosium can be efficiently separated by solvent extraction, using the neutral extractant Cyanex 923, if the conventional aqueous feed phase is largely replaced by the green polar organic solvent polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG 200). While pure aqueous and pure PEG 200 solutions in the presence of LiCl or HCl were not able to separate the two rare earth elements, high separation factors were observed when extraction was performed from PEG 200 chloride solutions with addition of small amounts of water. This addition of water bridges the gap between traditional hydrometallurgy and novel solvometallurgy and overcomes the challenges faced in both methods. The effect of different variables was investigated: water content, chloride concentration, type of chloride salt, Cyanex 923 concentration, scrubbing agent. A Job plot revealed the extraction stoichiometry is DyCl3·4L, where L is Cyanex 923. The McCabe-Thiele diagram for dysprosium extraction showed that complete extraction of this metal can be achieved by a 3-stage counter-current solvent extraction process, leaving neodymium behind in the raffinate. Finally, a conceptual flow sheet for the separation of neodymium and dysprosium including extraction, scrubbing, stripping, and regeneration steps was presented. The nonaqueous solvent extraction process presented in this paper can contribute to efficient recycling of rare earths from end-of-life neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets.
Strong neodymium-iron-boron
(NdFeB) permanent magnets are key components in a number of important
electronic appliances and green energy technologies, such as computer
hard drives, voice coil motors, wind turbines, and (hybrid) electric
vehicles.[1−7] It is expected that the demand for NdFeB magnets will continue to
grow to the extent that concerns have arisen over the long-term availability
of the REEs. The supply risk and strategic and economic importance
have lead the European Commission to include them in the list of critical
raw materials.[8] Similarly, the U.S. Department
of Energy stated that, among others, neodymium and dysprosium have
the highest supply risk within the near and foreseeable future.[9] Recycling of end-of-life magnets can contribute
to the future supply of REEs, thanks to the high concentration of
REEs present in these magnets.[5,10] Neodymium (Nd) is the
main REE component, and accounts for about 30 wt % of the mass of
a magnet. Dysprosium (Dy) is often added in concentrations to about
10 wt % to enhance temperature stability and coercivity, mainly in
applications where heat is generated during operations, as in wind
turbines and electric motors. Direct reuse of NdFeB magnets is possible
for large magnets such as the ones used in wind turbines, and direct
recycling via the hydrogen decrepitation process is attractive for
the recycling of magnets in hard disk drives or electric motors. In
other cases, direct magnet-to-magnet recycling is not feasible and
recovery of the REEs is the most viable option.[11,12] Both pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes have been
developed, with the hydrometallurgical ones being the most versatile,
because they allow to separate mixtures of REEs in the individual
elements. The most useful process for separation on a larger scale
is solvent extraction.[13] In the case of
NdFeB magnet recycling, especially the separation of neodymium from
dysprosium is important. Different researchers have investigated the
Nd/Dy separation by solvent extraction, with the aim of improving
the separation efficiency.[14−23] Moreover, as the use of green solvents is attractive and most recommended,
ionic liquids[24,25] and supercritical carbon dioxide[26,27] were investigated as well.However, some issues hamper further
improvement of the sustainability of the REE separation. One example
is the impossibility of using neutral extractants for REE extraction
from chloride feed solutions. Neutral extractants (e.g., Cyanex 923
or TOPO) are preferred over acidic extractants because the consumption
of chemicals for stripping of metals from the loaded organic phase
and for pH control can largely be avoided. Chloride salts are preferred
over nitrate salts because they are cheaper and allow for easier wastewater
treatment.[28] The inefficient extraction
of REEs from chloride aqueous solutions by neutral extractants is
largely caused by the strong hydration of REE ions and the poor coordinating
ability of chloride ions toward REE ions.[29] The issue of strong hydration of REE ions by water molecules can
be mitigated by replacing water by a polar organic solvent as is done
in nonaqueous solvent extraction.[30−36] Nonaqueous solvent extraction is a unit operation in solvometallurgy,
which is analogous to hydrometallurgy but with replacement of the
aqueous phase by an organic solvent.[30]It is evident that selection of the polar organic solvent in nonaqueous
solvent extraction has to be done very carefully and attention must
be paid not only to the extraction performance but to the sustainability
of the solvent as well.[30,37,38] For this reason, green solvents must be selected. One attractive
candidate is polyethylene glycol 200 (PEG 200). PEG 200 is a green,
sustainable solvent that is readily soluble in water in all proportions
but is insoluble in nonpolar organic solvents.[39] Its risks having been well studied, it is generally considered
to have very low toxicity, flammability, and environmental risks while
being commercially available at a low cost. Besides, it is nonvolatile,
readily biodegradable, and chemically stable to acids and bases. PEG
200 has been applied for the extraction of metal ions in aqueous biphasic
systems[40−43] as well as in triphasic systems.[44] Although
PEG 200 itself is, inherently, less sustainable than water, its remarkable
properties and coordinating abilities allow the separation of rare
earths to take place in fewer stages, while reducing acid consumption,
by being able to choose a neutral extractant rather than acidic extractants
conventionally used in rare-earth solvent extraction. This makes PEG
200 a suitable solvent to replace water (partially) in rare-earth
solvent extraction.The objective of this paper is to improve
separation factors for REE extraction from chloride media using a
neutral extractant, Cyanex 923, using a solvometallurgical approach,
while bridging the gap between hydrometallurgy and solvometallurgy
by the incorporation of the minimum possible amount of aqueous solutions
into the water-miscible more polar organic phase. We developed a sustainable
process for the separation of Dy(III) and Nd(III) by nonaqueous solvent
extraction using PEG 200 in the more polar (MP) phase and Cyanex 923
as extractant in the less polar (LP) phase. Cyanex 923 is a commercial
mixture of trialkyl phosphine oxides, with C6 and C8 chains.[45] It has the advantage
over trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO) that it is a liquid at room temperature,
and it is a stronger extractant than tri-n-butyl
phosphate (TBP).
Experimental Section
Chemicals
Polyethylene glycol with a number-average molecular mass of 200
g mol–1 (PEG 200) was obtained from J&K Scientific
(Zedelgem, Belgium). NdCl3·6H2O (99.9%)
was purchased from Strem Chemicals (Newburyport, USA), Nd2O3 (99.9%) from Alfa-Aesar (Geel, Belgium), DyCl3·6H2O (99.9%),) from abcr GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany),
and Dy2O3 from Strem Chemicals (Newburyport,
USA). Cyanex 923 was supplied by Solvay (Toulouse, France). Oxalic
acid (>99%) and LiCl (99.9%) were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich (Diegem,
Belgium). Hydrochloric acid (37%) was purchased from VWR Chemicals
(Haasrode, Belgium). The aliphatic hydrocarbondiluent ShellGTL Solvent
GS190 (GS190), composed of C10–C13n- and iso-alkanes with a boiling range of 187–218
°C, was supplied by Shell (Rotterdam, Netherlands). 1-Decanol
(99%) was ordered from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). 1-Butanol (99%)
was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Geel, Belgium). The silicone
solution in isopropanol was supplied by SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH
(Heidelberg, Germany). The gallium and scandium standard (1000 mg
L–1 in 2–5% HNO3) were obtained
from Chem-Lab NV (Zedelgem, Belgium). Triton X-100 was obtained from
Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Water was always of ultrapure quality,
deionized to a conductivity of <0.055 μS cm–1 (298.15 K) with a Merck Millipore Milli-Q Reference A+ system. All
chemicals were used as received without any further purification.
Feed Solutions
In a first series of experiments, the feed
solutions were prepared using rare-earth chloride salts to optimize
the feed conditions, i.e. the amount of water, concentration of acid,
and concentration of salting-out agent. The concentrations of Dy(III)
and Nd(III) in these feed solutions were 4 g L–1 for both REEs. In a next step, the optimized parameters were applied
on simulated feed prepared by using rare-earth oxides, with concentrations
mimicking those found in NdFeB magnet leachate, i.e., 12.2 g L–1 Nd(III) and 1.1 g L–1 Dy(III).
The oxides were directly dissolved in mixed PEG 200/aqueous HCl solution
to prepare the feed solution.
Solvent Extraction Procedure
and Instrumentation
The more polar (MP) organic phase consisting
of a PEG 200 solution of REEs and the less polar (LP) organic phase
containing Cyanex 923diluted with GS190 and modifier (10 vol % 1-decanol)
were mixed using a wrist action shaker at ambient temperature (21
± 1 °C) for 60 min, which is sufficient to attain equilibrium.
The MP:LP phase ratio was 1:1, unless stated otherwise. After reaching
equilibrium, the phase separation was accelerated by centrifugation
(Heraeus Labofuge 200, Thermo Scientific, United States). After proper
dilution with a 5 vol % Triton-X100 solution, the REE concentrations
in the PEG 200 phase were analyzed by a S2 Picofox TXRF spectrometer
(Bruker, Germany), equipped with a molybdenum X-ray source and operated
at a voltage of 50 kV.[46,47] A certain amount of 1000 mg L–1 gallium standard solution was added as internal standard.
Quartz glass carriers were pretreated with 30 μL of SERVA silicone
solution in isopropanol to siliconize the carrier, in order to avoid
the spreading of the sample, and subsequently dried at 60 °C
for 5 min. A sample of 2 μL was placed on the pretreated quartz
glass carrier and dried at 60 °C for 30 min. All samples were
measured in duplicate.The distribution ratio D is defined as the ratio of the total metal concentration cLP in the LP organic phase (Cyanex 923) to the
total metal concentration cMP in the MP
organic phase (PEG 200) at equilibrium and is represented asThe percentage
extraction (%E) is the total amount of metal
transferred to the LP organic phase divided by the total amount of
metal in the MP organic feed, expressed as a percentage. With applying
the definition of the distribution ratio and defining VMP and VLP as the volume of
the MP and LP phase, respectively, %E is defined
asThe separation factor α
is the quotient of distribution ratio of a metal A to the distribution
ratio of a metal B and is defined as
Stripping
Equal volumes of an aqueous
oxalic acid solution and the loaded LP phase were contacted for 60
min at room temperature (21 ± 1 °C). The concentration of
oxalic acid used in stripping was the exact stoichiometric amount
needed for precipitation of all rare earths in the LP phase. For a
LP phase containing 0.9 g L–1 Dy(III), this corresponds
to 8.3 mmol L–1. After reaching equilibrium, the
phase separation was accelerated by centrifugation (Heraeus Labofuge
200, Thermo Scientific, United States). The remaining Dy(III) concentration
in the LP phase was determined via inductively coupled plasma-optical
emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), performed with an Avio 500 spectrometer
(PerkinElmer, United States) equipped with a GemCone low-flow nebulizer,
baffled cyclonic spray chamber, alumina injector, and PerkinElmer
Hybrid XLT torch. The samples of the LP phase, the calibration solutions,
the blank solution, and quality controls were diluted in 1-butanol,
with 5 ppm of scandium added as internal standard. The line at 353.170
nm for Dy(III) was measured in axial viewing mode.
Viscosity Measurements
The viscosity of the feed solutions with varying water content
was measured using a rolling-ball viscometer (Anton Paar LOVIS 2000
M/ME, Austria). Density and viscosity were measured simultaneously,
which allowed the software to calculate the dynamic viscosity. The
capillaries had a diameter of 1.8 mm for samples with a water content
up to 30 vol % and 1.59 mm for higher water content. Gold-coated steel
balls (7.88 g cm–3) were used. The operating temperature
was 25 °C; the angle was 45°.
Results and Discussion
Bridging the gap between hydrometallurgy and solvometallurgy often
requires addition of a fraction of water, albeit at a concentration
lower than 50 vol %, as a solution having a higher water content is
to be considered a dilute aqueous solution of organic solvent.[30] The addition of water in a nonaqueous system
can have several advantages. First, rare-earth oxides are not soluble
in appreciable amounts in most of the organic solvents. They need
to be converted into rare-earth salts in order to dissolve them and
to prepare the feed for solvent extraction studies. Therefore, a limited
amount of aqueous acid is added to the MP organic phase, in this case
PEG 200, enabling the dissolution of rare-earth oxides. Another possibility
is to add the aqueous leachate containing a rare-earth chloride mix
directly to the MP organic phase, thus facilitating integration into
hydrometallurgical flow sheets. Besides, addition of water helps to
lower the viscosity of the MP organic phase (Figure ).
Figure 1
Influence of water content on the viscosity
of PEG 200 feed solutions. [Nd] = 12 g L–1, [Dy]
= 1 g L–1, [HCl] = 2 mol L–1.
The PEG 200 + 0 vol % water sample does not contain HCl. Temperature:
25 °C.
Influence of water content on the viscosity
of PEG 200 feed solutions. [Nd] = 12 g L–1, [Dy]
= 1 g L–1, [HCl] = 2 mol L–1.
The PEG 200 + 0 vol % water sample does not contain HCl. Temperature:
25 °C.Being able to introduce a certain
amount of water in the solvometallurgical system gives one an extra
degree of freedom to optimize the process parameters. The effect of
water was therefore studied by varying its concentration from 0 to
100 vol % in PEG 200, with a constant chloride concentration (Figure ). The chloride source
was either LiCl or HCl, both at a concentration of 1 mol L–1. The feed concentration was 4 g L–1 for both Nd(III)
and Dy(III), and the Cyanex 923 (C923) concentration was 1 mol L–1. The Nd/Dy separation by solvent extraction is clearly
not possible from either pure PEG 200, which resulted in 100% extraction
of both rare earths, or from pure water, in which case barely any
rare earths were extracted. Addition of water to PEG 200 resulted
in a decrease of the percentage extraction, with the decrease for
Nd(III) being stronger than for Dy(III). This decrease can be explained
by differences in solvation in PEG 200 and aqueous solutions. In aqueous
solutions, rare-earth ions strongly coordinate to water molecules;
in PEG 200 solutions also chloride ions can enter the first coordination
sphere, replacing water.[35,48] For instance, according
to Rogers et al., Nd(III) and Dy(III) species in tri(ethylene) glycol-chloride
solutions appeared to exist as [MCl2(OH2)(EO3)]Cl2, with M = Nd, Dy and EO3 = tri(ethylene) glycol.[48] Since it is easier to form the neutral lanthanide
chloride salt complex in nonaqueous PEG 200 solutions, extraction
of these ions by Cyanex 923 is enhanced. Mixtures of PEG 200 and 30–40
vol % water allowed us to separate Nd(III) and Dy(III) well, with
separation factors of 69 and 54 for the LiCl and HCl systems, respectively.
The effect of addition of water to PEG 200–HCl was found to
be larger than the effect on the PEG 200–LiCl system, over
the complete range of concentrations. This observation can be explained
by the competition of metal ion extraction and the efficient extraction
of mineral acids, such as HCl, from aqueous solutions by Cyanex 923.[49]
Figure 2
Effect of water on the extraction of Nd(III) and Dy(III)
from PEG 200 by Cyanex 923 at constant chloride concentration. Feed:
[Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] or [HCl] = 1 mol L–1, [C923] = 1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10
vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
Effect of water on the extraction of Nd(III) and Dy(III)
from PEG 200 by Cyanex 923 at constant chloride concentration. Feed:
[Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] or [HCl] = 1 mol L–1, [C923] = 1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10
vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.Both for LiCl and HCl, the effect of the chloride concentration
was studied at two different conditions: PEG 200 + 30 vol % water
and 40 vol % water. The studied chloride concentrations for PEG 200
+ 30 vol % water were 0.1–3 mol L–1, while
for PEG 200 + 40 vol % water this was 0.1–4 mol L–1. Figure a shows
that percentage extraction for both REEs increased up to 3 mol L–1 of LiCl, after which extraction slightly decreased.
The same positive trend for Dy(III) extraction was observed with increasing
HCl concentrations (Figure b). However, the Nd(III) extraction efficiency remained negligible,
even at high HCl concentrations, which is in contrast to the effect
of LiCl. As a result at 2 mol L–1 HCl and 30 vol
% water, a separation factor of almost 260 was obtained. In comparison,
at 0.5 mol L–1 LiCl and 30 vol % water, a separation
factor of 38 was achieved. With regard to the water content, 30 vol
% water was found to be the optimal concentration, a further increase
in the water concentration led to a decrease in extraction efficiency
and separation factor.
Figure 3
Effect of (a) LiCl or (b) HCl concentration on the extraction
of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from PEG 200 + 30 and 40 vol % water. Feed:
[Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] or [HCl] = 0.1–4
mol L–1, [C923] = 1 mol L–1 in
GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
Effect of (a) LiCl or (b) HCl concentration on the extraction
of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from PEG 200 + 30 and 40 vol % water. Feed:
[Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] or [HCl] = 0.1–4
mol L–1, [C923] = 1 mol L–1 in
GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.The influence of extractant concentration on the
separation was studied from both LiCl and HCl media. Figure clearly shows that the separation
of Nd(III) and Dy(III) was better for extraction from HCl media, as
there was almost no coextraction of Nd(III), resulting in a separation
factor larger than 6000 at 0.5 mol L–1 Cyanex 923.
In LiCl media, the maximum attainable separation factor was 21. At higher Cyanex 923 concentrations,
the separation factor decreases as the extraction of Dy(III) levels
off, while Nd(III) extraction increases. At 0 mol L–1 Cyanex 923, the 1-decanol/GS190 mixture cannot extract the rare-earth
ions.
Figure 4
Effect of Cyanex 923 concentration on the extraction of Nd and Dy
from PEG 200 + 30 vol % water solution. Feed: [Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] = 0.5 mol L–1 or [HCl]
= 2 mol L–1, [C923] = 0–1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
Effect of Cyanex 923 concentration on the extraction of Nd and Dy
from PEG 200 + 30 vol % water solution. Feed: [Nd] = [Dy] = 4 g L–1, [LiCl] = 0.5 mol L–1 or [HCl]
= 2 mol L–1, [C923] = 0–1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.To find out the extraction mechanism, the method
of continuous variation was used, creating the Job plot displayed
in Figure .[50] This plot is constructed by varying the feed
concentration of Dy(III) with regard to the concentration of Cyanex
923 in the less polar phase, while keeping the total concentration
constant, i.e., [Dy(III)] + [C923] = 0.5 mol L–1. As a result, the X-axis shows the variation of
the mole fraction of Dy(III), calculated aswhere nDy and nC923 are the number of moles of
Dy(III) and Cyanex 923, respectively. The Y-axis
corresponds to the concentration of Dy(III) in the LP phase, and thus
the concentration of Dy–C923 complexes in the LP phase. The
experiment has been performed using different MP phases, containing
10, 30, and 50 vol % water. A least-squares linear fit through the
first three data points (R2 = 0.955, 0.979, and 0.981 for
10, 30, and 50 vol % water, respectively) and the final 6 data points
(R2 = 0.992, 0.992, and 0.995 for 10, 30, and 50 vol %
water, respectively) has been used for construction of the plot. The
maximum very close to XDy = 0.2 indicates
that four molecules of Cyanex 923 are coordinating to Dy(III), which
agrees with earlier observations for the extraction of Yb(III) from
ethylene glycol chloride solutions by Cyanex 923.[31] The following extraction mechanism is thus proposedHere, the overbar
indicates the species in the less polar phase, L represents Cyanex
923 and x, y the stoichiometric
number of PEG and water molecules coordinating to Dy(III) in the more
polar phase, respectively. Furthermore, the water content in the MP
phase has little to no influence on the extraction mechanism, as the
maxima of the three studied conditions coincide. In other words, the
difference in extraction efficiency can only be ascribed to a difference
in speciation of the rare-earth ion in the MP phase, as suggested
earlier, rather than a difference in extraction mechanism.
On the basis of the optimized extraction
parameters, a new solvent extraction process was developed, based
on a feed composition which resembles the concentration in real pregnant
leach solutions from NdFeB magnet leaching. A synthetic feed solution
with 12.2 g L–1 Nd(III) and 1 g L–1 Dy(III) was prepared starting from rare-earth oxides. The increased
Nd/Dy molar ratio compared to the previous experiments resulted in
a decrease of Dy(III) extraction efficiency and an increase of Nd(III)
coextraction, as can be seen in Figure . At 0.5 mol L–1, 72% of Dy(III)
was extracted, and a separation factor of 42 was attained.
Figure 6
Effect of Cyanex
923 concentration on the extraction of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from PEG
200 + 30 vol % water. Feed prepared from oxides: [Nd] = 12.2 g L–1, [Dy] = 1.1 g L–1, [HCl] = 2 mol
L–1, [C923] = 0.1–1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
Effect of Cyanex
923 concentration on the extraction of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from PEG
200 + 30 vol % water. Feed prepared from oxides: [Nd] = 12.2 g L–1, [Dy] = 1.1 g L–1, [HCl] = 2 mol
L–1, [C923] = 0.1–1 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol). Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.A McCabe–Thiele diagram was constructed
to determine the number of theoretical stages required to separate
Dy(III) from Nd(III) with the optimized system. It was estimated that
at least three stages would be needed for the extraction of Dy(III)
using a MP:LP phase ratio of 1:1 (Figure ).
Figure 7
McCabe-Thiele diagram for Dy(III) extraction
isotherm. Feed prepared from oxides: [Dy] = 1.1 g L–1 ([Nd] = 12.2 g L–1), [HCl] = 2 mol L–1, [C923] = 0.5 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol).
MP:LP phase ratio = 7:1–1:7. Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
McCabe-Thiele diagram for Dy(III) extraction
isotherm. Feed prepared from oxides: [Dy] = 1.1 g L–1 ([Nd] = 12.2 g L–1), [HCl] = 2 mol L–1, [C923] = 0.5 mol L–1 in GS190 (+10 vol % 1-decanol).
MP:LP phase ratio = 7:1–1:7. Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.To further purify the extracted Dy(III), the coextracted
Nd(III) needs to be removed by a scrubbing step. A loaded LP phase
was created by contacting a PEG 200 feed solution with 0.5 mol L–1 of Cyanex 923, at identical conditions as mentioned
in Figure . Around
6% of Nd(III) was coextracted (0.7 g L–1), while
72% of Dy(III) was extracted (0.9 g L–1). Several
PEG 200-HCl solutions were investigated for the removal of coextracted
Nd(III) (Table ).
While the PEG 200–HCl scrub feed without addition of Dy(III)
could remove the coextracted Nd(III) quantitatively, there was a considerable
loss of Dy(III). A scrub feed containing either 0.9 or 1.8 g L–1 Dy(III) removed the coextracted Nd(III) as well,
while avoiding Dy(III) loss. Changing the phase ratio to MP:LP = 1:2
decreased somewhat the percentage scrubbing for Nd(III) but offered
a possibility to increase the concentration of Nd(III) in the scrub
raffinate. Ideally, the concentration of HCl should be 2 mol L–1, so that the scrub raffinate can be added to the
initial feed solution. A small number of scrubbing stages will eventually
remove Nd(III) quantitatively, using the optimized parameters: MP:LP
= 1:2, [HCl]scrub = 2.0 mol L–1, [Dy(III)]scrub = 0.9 g L–1.
Table 1
Scrubbing
Studies for Removal of Co-Extracted Nd(III)a
Phase ratio (MP:LP)
[HCl]scrub, mol L–1
[Dy(III)]scrub, g L–1
%Scrubbing,
Nd(III)
%Stripping, Dy(III)
1:1
0.5
0.0
99.3
65.1
1.0
0.0
100
46.6
2.0
0.0
96.4
24.4
1.0
0.9
99.0
b
2.0
1.9
99.5
b
1:2
1.0
0.0
77.3
23.5
1.0
0.9
81.0
14.8
1.0
1.9
79.7
b
2.0
0.9
81.1
b
2.0
1.9
81.5
b
The variables within the PEG 200 scrub solution
were: HCl concentration, Dy(III) concentration, and MP:LP phase ratio.
The loaded LP phase contained [Nd] = 0.7 g L–1 and
[Dy] = 0.9 g L–1. Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.
Mass balance calculations based
on scrub raffinate concentrations indicated that there was net extraction
of Dy(III) from the scrub feed, hence no stripping percentage can
be mentioned.
The variables within the PEG 200 scrub solution
were: HCl concentration, Dy(III) concentration, and MP:LP phase ratio.
The loaded LP phase contained [Nd] = 0.7 g L–1 and
[Dy] = 0.9 g L–1. Temperature: 21 ± 1 °C.Mass balance calculations based
on scrub raffinate concentrations indicated that there was net extraction
of Dy(III) from the scrub feed, hence no stripping percentage can
be mentioned.Eventually,
the Dy(III) in the scrubbed LP phase can be precipitated quantitatively
by use of an aqueous oxalic acid solution. A LP phase containing 0.9
g L–1 Dy(III) was contacted with the exact stoichiometric
amount of oxalic acid aqueous solution (8.3 mmol L–1) at a phase ratio of MP:LP = 1:1, for 1 h at room temperature (21
± 1 °C). After being stripped, the LP phase contained just
0.13 mg L–1 (RSD 4.8%) of Dy(III), corresponding
to a stripping efficiency of >99.99%. The oxalate precipitate can
be filtered off, dried, and calcined to produce pure Dy2O3 for reuse in magnets.
Recycling Studies
Reuse of the LP phase (0.5 mol L–1 Cyanex 923,
10 vol % 1-decanol in GS190 solvent) was investigated for six extraction-stripping
cycles. The LP phase was contacted with a feed containing 12.2 g L–1 Nd(III) and 1.1 g L–1 Dy(III) in
a separatory funnel for 1 h, after which it was stripped with oxalic
acid as described in a previous section. As HCl from the MP phase
is likely partially extracted by Cyanex 923, 2 contacts with pure
water at a phase ratio MP:LP = 1:1 were performed after every stripping
cycle, with each washing step taking 15 min.[49,51] The percentage Dy(III) and Nd(III) extracted during the first cycle
was 71% (RSD: 0.3%) and 5% (RSD: 0.9%), respectively. The percentages
Dy(III) and Nd(III) extracted were decreased slightly for the second
cycle and were maintained constant over the next four cycles at a
value of 68% (RSD: 5.1%) and 4% (RSD: 2.0%), respectively. Stripping
percentage exceeded 99.9% in all stripping cycles. As expected, pH
of the aqueous wash solutions decreased slightly as HCl was stripped
back, with 5.9 for the first washing step, while for the second washing
step, the pH was about neutral. These observations prove the recycling
capacity and thus the stability of the extraction system.
Conceptual
Flow Sheet
A conceptual flow sheet for the nonaqueous solvent
extraction process based on above optimizations is presented in Figure . A mixture of Nd(III)
and Dy(III) can be added as a rare-earth oxide, by dissolving it in
PEG 200 +HCl, or can be added as an aqueous rare-earth chloride solution.
Concentrations of HCl and water must be adjusted to the optimized
values as mentioned above. Three stages of extraction are required
for complete extraction of Dy(III). The coextracted Nd(III) can be
removed easily using few stages at a phase ratio of MP:LP = 1:2 and
a Dy(III) concentration of 0.9 g L–1. The extracted
Dy(III) is stripped by a limited amount of oxalic acid from the loaded
LP phase, generating pure Dy(III) oxalate precipitate. Nd(III) remaining
in the raffinate cannot be precipitated directly by oxalic acid, as
rare-earth oxalates are soluble in PEG 200. Instead, it can be extracted
by Cyanex 923 in one stage, after (partial) removal of water, bringing
back the water concentration between 0 vol % and 10 vol % (Figure ), followed by precipitation
stripping by oxalic acid. Excess water can be removed by traditional
distillation or by pervaporation using polymeric membranes,[52−55] ceramic membranes,[56] or zeolites.[57] Pervaporation is a green alternative for conventional
distillation that has been suggested to be used in dehydration of
ethylene glycol–polyethylene glycol mixtures after their synthesis
from ethylene oxide, and for the dewatering of di(ethylene) glycol
and tri(ethylene) glycol, used in natural gas dehydration. Dewatering
is needed for a second reason: preparing a new feed solution requires
the addition of the rare earths mixture as aqueous chloride solution
or as rare-earth oxides, in which case fresh aqueous HCl solution
needs to be added. In both cases, water is added in the process, requiring
a partial removal of water prior to reuse of the PEG 200. The LP phase
is regenerated after removing the extracted HCl by contacting it with
an aqueous phase and can be reused in subsequent extraction cycles
as well.[51] In summary, this process does
not eliminate water but limits its use during extraction while providing
better separation in less stages. Moreover, the possibility of working
with neutral extractants limits the base consumption for pH control
and excessive acid consumption during stripping.
Figure 8
Conceptual flow sheet
for separation and recovery of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from a mixed-oxide
feed.
Conceptual flow sheet
for separation and recovery of Nd(III) and Dy(III) from a mixed-oxide
feed.
Conclusion
While
it is not possible to separate Nd(III) and Dy(III) from aqueous chloride
solution by solvent extraction with Cyanex 923, present work has shown
that high separation factors can be obtained when these rare-earth
ions are extracted from the PEG 200 chloride solution as solvent in
the more polar phase when small amounts of water are added. The separation
factor increases even further when HCl is used as a chloride source,
instead of LiCl. A solvometallurgical process was developed for feed
solutions mimicking the real NdFeB magnet composition, which can be
integrated in existing hydrometallurgical flow sheets, either through
the dissolution of a mixed-oxide or the addition of an amount of concentrated
aqueous rare-earth solution. The process comprises three extraction
stages for the recovery of Dy(III), followed by at least one stage
of scrubbing and one of stripping with oxalic acid, to recover pure
Dy(III) oxalate. Eventually, this paper proposes an efficient way
of separating Dy(III) and Nd(III) followed by recovery as rare-earth
oxalate, which in turn can be calcined to obtain the much needed rare-earth
oxides that can be used directly in the production of NdFeB magnet
alloy.
Authors: Oliver Gutfleisch; Matthew A Willard; Ekkes Brück; Christina H Chen; S G Sankar; J Ping Liu Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 30.849