Literature DB >> 33456989

Deaths of colon neuroendocrine tumors are associated with increasing metastatic lymph nodes and lymph node ratio.

Changchun Xiao1, Baorong Song2,3,4, Peipei Yi5, Yangyang Xie2,3,4, Biqing Li6, Peng Lian7, Shaoqing Ding2,3,4, Yuanming Lu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colon neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon. Currently, the impact of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) and lymph node ratio (LNR) on survival has been well investigated in other colon malignancies, but both remain nebulous for patients with colon NETs.
METHODS: Surgically resected patients with histologically proven nonmetastatic colon NETs were queried from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2011. Patients with lymph nodes involved were investigated and categorized into four LNs-based classifications (≤4, >4-10, >10-13, and >13) or three LNR-based subgroups (≤0.51, >0.51-0.71, and >0.71) according to the threshold, determined by Harrell's C statistic. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed by log-rank test and Cox stepwise regression analysis, respectively.
RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, higher LNR and LNs classification are associated with a worse prognosis. The 10-year NETs-specific survival rate was 78.3% (74.2-82.6%), 61.3% (52.4-71.7%), 40.8% (20.7-80.7%) for patients in the ≤4, >4-10, and 10-13 LNs groups, respectively. When patients were classified with LNR, the observed 10-year NETs-specific survival rate was 79.9% (74.8-85.5%) for ≤0.51, 57.4% (43.8-75.2%) for >0.51-0.71, and 40.0% (31.0-51.5%) for >0.71. In stratified analysis, higher LNs and LNR groups have worse prognosis only in patients with advanced T stage (T3-T4). Regarding stage migration, the LNR-based system did not show superiority to LNs-based classification.
CONCLUSIONS: Current TNM staging classification could be improved by considering the count of metastatic nodes and LNR instead of a simple record of lymph node status (N1 or N0) for colon NETs. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon; lymph node status; neuroendocrine tumor (NET); prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456989      PMCID: PMC7807263          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  20 in total

1.  The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Kentaro Inoue; Yasushi Nakane; Hitoshi Iiyama; Mutsuya Sato; Tatsuya Kanbara; Koji Nakai; Syunichiro Okumura; Keigo Yamamichi; Koshiro Hioki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  TNM staging of midgut and hindgut (neuro) endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; A Couvelard; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Orhan Celen; Emin Yildirim; Uğur Berberoglu
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node number, ratio and station in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaolong Tang; Yingtai Chen; Lanwei Guo; Jianwei Zhang; Chengfeng Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Prognostic significance of the number of axillary lymph nodes removed in patients with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  L Weir; C Speers; Y D'yachkova; I A Olivotto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The number of lymph nodes examined debate in colon cancer: how much is enough?

Authors:  Stephanie R Downing; Kerry-Ann Cadogan; Gezzer Ortega; Zenab Jaji; Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro; Tolulope A Oyetunji; David C Chang; Debra H Ford; Wayne A I Frederick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Revised staging classification improves outcome prediction for small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Michelle Kang Kim; Richard R P Warner; Sasan Roayaie; Noam Harpaz; Stephen C Ward; Steven Itzkowitz; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States.

Authors:  James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089.

Authors:  T E Le Voyer; E R Sigurdson; A L Hanlon; R J Mayer; J S Macdonald; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D M Sosin; C K Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organs.

Authors:  Anne Couvelard; Jérôme Cros
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic nomograms for lung neuroendocrine carcinomas based on lymph node ratio: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Lan Xiong; Youfan Jiang; Tianyang Hu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.