Literature DB >> 33456614

Cytogenetics and Molecular Investigations detect a Mosaic Variant of Turner Syndrome only Suspected by Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Two Case Reports with Negative Ultrasound Examinations.

Francesco Libotte1, Sonia Lorena Carpineto1, Claudio Dello Russo1, Antonella Viola1, Katia Margiotti1, Fabrizia Restaldi2, Antonio Novelli2, Alvaro Mesoraca1, Claudio Giorlandino3.   

Abstract

Prenatal testing has been moving towards non-invasive methods to determine fetal risk for genetic disorders. Numerous studies have focused the attention on common trisomies; although the detection rate (DR) for trisomy 21 is high (over 95%), the accuracy regarding the DR for trisomies 13 and 18 has come under scrutiny. The testing has been applied to sex chromosome aneuploidies, but many studies have shown that it is not as effective as it is for common trisomies. Although non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has become a standard screening procedure for all pregnant women, invasive sampling procedures remain important in confirming NIPT-positive findings. In the present study, we report discordant results of Turner syndrome (TS) mosaicism between NIPT and karyotyping. A 35-year-old pregnant woman underwent NIPT, and a probable risk for Xp deletion was indicated. Subsequently, amniocentesis was performed. The karyotype was identified as mos 45,X [28]/46,X,i(X)(q1.0)[5]. In the second case, a 33-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis after a positive NIPT that indicated a probable risk for monosomy X. The result was mos 45,X [8]/46,XY[8]. Since NIPT is a screening test, the possibility of false-positive or false-negative results should always be considered. We underline the importance of pre/post detailed counseling. Furthermore, women with abnormal NIPT results should undergo immediate amniocentesis that remains the only tool for a correct diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies. ©Carol Davila University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Counselling; Turner syndrome; mosaicism; non-invasive prenatal test; prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456614      PMCID: PMC7803325          DOI: 10.25122/jml-2020-0092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Life        ISSN: 1844-122X


  22 in total

1.  Skeletal features and growth patterns in 14 patients with haploinsufficiency of SHOX: implications for the development of Turner syndrome.

Authors:  T Kosho; K Muroya; T Nagai; M Fujimoto; S Yokoya; H Sakamoto; T Hirano; H Terasaki; H Ohashi; G Nishimura; S Sato; N Matsuo; T Ogata
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Developmental hematopoiesis in normal human fetal blood.

Authors:  F Forestier; F Daffos; N Catherine; M Renard; J P Andreux
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what pregnant women may want to know.

Authors:  D Oepkes; Y Yaron; P Kozlowski; M J Rego de Sousa; J L Bartha; E S van den Akker; S M Dornan; E Krampl-Bettelheim; M Schmid; M Wielgos; V Cirigliano; G C Di Renzo; A Cameron; P Calda; A Tabor
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Mutation and deletion of the pseudoautosomal gene SHOX cause Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis.

Authors:  D J Shears; H J Vassal; F R Goodman; R W Palmer; W Reardon; A Superti-Furga; P J Scambler; R M Winter
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Validation of Extensive Next-Generation Sequencing Method for Monogenic Disorder Analysis on Cell-Free Fetal DNA: Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Claudio Dello Russo; Anthony Cesta; Salvatore Longo; Maria A Barone; Antonella Cima; Alvaro Mesoraca; Davide Sparacino; Antonella Viola; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Isolating fetal cells in maternal circulation for prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J L Simpson; S Elias
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  Short stature due to SHOX deficiency: genotype, phenotype, and therapy.

Authors:  Gerhard Binder
Journal:  Horm Res Paediatr       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.852

Review 8.  Deletions and translocations involving the distal short arm of the human X chromosome: review and hypotheses.

Authors:  A Ballabio; G Andria
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Normal newborn with prenatal suspicion of X chromosome monosomy due to confined placental mosaicism.

Authors:  Danielius Serapinas; Daiva Bartkeviciene; Emilija Valantinaviciene; Egle Machtejeviene
Journal:  Arch Argent Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  A Girl with 10 Mb Distal Xp Deletion Arising from Maternal Pericentric Inversion: Clinical Data and Molecular Characterization.

Authors:  Ioannis Papoulidis; Annalisa Vetro; Vassilis Paspaliaris; Monika Ziegler; Katharina Kreskowski; George Daskalakis; Vasilios Papadopoulos; Themistoklis Dagklis; Thomas Liehr; Loretta Thomaidis; Emmanouil Manolakos
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.