Jonathan Green1, Maria Robinson2, Richard Pilbery3, Gregory Whitley4, Helen Hall5, Madeleine Clout6, Barnaby Reeves6, Kim Kirby7, Jonathan Benger8. 1. University of Plymouth; South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust. 2. South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust. 3. Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust. 4. East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust; University of Lincoln. 5. East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust; James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. 6. Bristol Medical School. 7. South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust; University of the West of England. 8. University of the West of England.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: AIRWAYS-2 was a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of the i-gel supraglottic airway device with tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In order to successfully conduct this clinical trial, it was necessary for research paramedics to overcome multiple challenges, many of which will be relevant to future emergency medical service (EMS) research. This article aims to describe a number of the challenges that were encountered during the out-of-hospital phase of the AIRWAYS-2 trial and how these were overcome. METHODS: The research paramedics responsible for conducting the pre-hospital phase of the trial were asked to reflect on their experience of facilitating the AIRWAYS-2 trial. Responses were then collated by the lead author. A process of iterative revision and review was undertaken by the research paramedics to produce a consensus of opinion. RESULTS: The main challenges identified by the trial research paramedics related to the recruitment and training of paramedics, screening of eligible patients and investigation of protocol deviations / reporting errors. Even though a feasibility study was conducted prior to the commencement of AIRWAYS-2, the scale of these challenges was underestimated. CONCLUSION: Large-scale pragmatic cluster randomised trials are being successfully undertaken in out-of-hospital care. However, they require intensive engagement with EMS clinicians and local research paramedics, particularly when the intervention is contentious. Feasibility studies are an important part of research but may fail to identify all potential challenges. Therefore, flexibility is required to manage unforeseen difficulties.
INTRODUCTION: AIRWAYS-2 was a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of the i-gel supraglottic airway device with tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In order to successfully conduct this clinical trial, it was necessary for research paramedics to overcome multiple challenges, many of which will be relevant to future emergency medical service (EMS) research. This article aims to describe a number of the challenges that were encountered during the out-of-hospital phase of the AIRWAYS-2 trial and how these were overcome. METHODS: The research paramedics responsible for conducting the pre-hospital phase of the trial were asked to reflect on their experience of facilitating the AIRWAYS-2 trial. Responses were then collated by the lead author. A process of iterative revision and review was undertaken by the research paramedics to produce a consensus of opinion. RESULTS: The main challenges identified by the trial research paramedics related to the recruitment and training of paramedics, screening of eligible patients and investigation of protocol deviations / reporting errors. Even though a feasibility study was conducted prior to the commencement of AIRWAYS-2, the scale of these challenges was underestimated. CONCLUSION: Large-scale pragmatic cluster randomised trials are being successfully undertaken in out-of-hospital care. However, they require intensive engagement with EMS clinicians and local research paramedics, particularly when the intervention is contentious. Feasibility studies are an important part of research but may fail to identify all potential challenges. Therefore, flexibility is required to manage unforeseen difficulties.
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Bernd W Böttiger; Gavin D Perkins; Carsten Lott; Pierre Carli; Tommaso Pellis; Claudio Sandroni; Markus B Skrifvars; Gary B Smith; Kjetil Sunde; Charles D Deakin Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Henry E Wang; David K Prince; Shannon W Stephens; Heather Herren; Mohamud Daya; Neal Richmond; Jestin Carlson; Craig Warden; M Riccardo Colella; Ashley Brienza; Tom P Aufderheide; Ahamed H Idris; Robert Schmicker; Susanne May; Graham Nichol Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Helen Pocock; Charles D Deakin; Tom Quinn; Gavin D Perkins; Jessica Horton; Simon Gates Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Maria J Robinson; Jodi Taylor; Stephen J Brett; Jerry P Nolan; Matthew Thomas; Barnaby C Reeves; Chris A Rogers; Sarah Voss; Madeleine Clout; Jonathan R Benger Journal: Trials Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Jonathan R Benger; Kim Kirby; Sarah Black; Stephen J Brett; Madeleine Clout; Michelle J Lazaroo; Jerry P Nolan; Barnaby C Reeves; Maria Robinson; Lauren J Scott; Helena Smartt; Adrian South; Elizabeth A Stokes; Jodi Taylor; Matthew Thomas; Sarah Voss; Sarah Wordsworth; Chris A Rogers Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jodi Taylor; Sarah Black; Stephen J Brett; Kim Kirby; Jerry P Nolan; Barnaby C Reeves; Maria Robinson; Chris A Rogers; Lauren J Scott; Adrian South; Elizabeth A Stokes; Matthew Thomas; Sarah Voss; Sarah Wordsworth; Jonathan R Benger Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Jonathan Richard Benger; Sarah Voss; David Coates; Rosemary Greenwood; Jerry Nolan; Steven Rawstorne; Megan Rhys; Matthew Thomas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.692