Literature DB >> 33456371

A Metabolic Gene Signature to Predict Overall Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Zeng-Hong Wu1,2, Yun Tang3, Yue Zhou1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a common malignancy that emanates from the lips, mouth, paranasal sinuses, oropharynx, larynx, nasopharynx, and from other pharyngeal cancers. The availability of high-throughput expression data has made it possible to use global gene expression data to analyze the relationship between metabolic-related gene expression and clinical outcomes in HNSCC patients.
METHOD: In this study, we used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA), with validation in the GEO dataset to profile the metabolic microenvironment and define potential biomarkers for metabolic therapy.
RESULTS: We extracted data for 529 patients and 327 metabolic genes (198 upregulated and 129 downregulated genes) in the TCGA database. Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and CA6 had the largest logFCs in the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. Our Cox regression model data showed 51 prognostic-related genes with lysocardiolipin acyltransferase 1 (LCLAT1) and choline dehydrogenase (CHDH) being associated with the highest risk (HR = 1.144, 95% CI = 1.044 ~ 1.251) and the lowest risk (HR = 0.580, 95% CI = 0.400 ~ 0.839) in HNSCC, respectively. We next used the ROC curve to evaluate whether the differentially expressed metabolic-related genes could serve as early predictors of HNSCC. The findings showed an AUC of 0.745 and 0.618 in the TCGA and GEO analysis, respectively. Besides, the ability for the genes to predict clinicopathological HNSCC status was analyzed and the data showed that the AUC for age, gender, grade, stage, T, M, and N was 0.520, 0.495, 0.568, 0.606, 0.577, 0.476, and 0.673, respectively, in the TCGA dataset. On the other hand, the AUC for age, gender, stage, T, M, N, smoking, and HPV16-pos was 0.599, 0.531, 0.622, 0.606, 0.616, 0.550, 0.614, 0.519, and 0.397, respectively, in the GEO dataset.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, our study unearths a novel metabolic gene signature for the prediction of HNSCC prognosis based on the TCGA dataset. Our signature might point out the metabolic microenvironment disorders and provides potential treatment targets and prognostic biomarkers.
Copyright © 2020 Zeng-Hong Wu et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456371      PMCID: PMC7787728          DOI: 10.1155/2020/6716908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mediators Inflamm        ISSN: 0962-9351            Impact factor:   4.711


  27 in total

Review 1.  How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Alexia Iasonos; Deborah Schrag; Ganesh V Raj; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Galactose metabolism and health.

Authors:  Ana I Coelho; Gerard T Berry; M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization.

Authors:  Abhishek K Jha; Stanley Ching-Cheng Huang; Alexey Sergushichev; Vicky Lampropoulou; Yulia Ivanova; Ekaterina Loginicheva; Karina Chmielewski; Kelly M Stewart; Juliet Ashall; Bart Everts; Edward J Pearce; Edward M Driggers; Maxim N Artyomov
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  Regulation of pH by Carbonic Anhydrase 9 Mediates Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Cells With Activated KRAS in Response to Hypoxia.

Authors:  Paul C McDonald; Shawn C Chafe; Wells S Brown; Saeed Saberi; Mridula Swayampakula; Geetha Venkateswaran; Oksana Nemirovsky; Jordan A Gillespie; Joanna M Karasinska; Steve E Kalloger; Claudiu T Supuran; David F Schaeffer; Ali Bashashati; Sohrab P Shah; James T Topham; Donald T Yapp; Jinyang Li; Daniel J Renouf; Ben Z Stanger; Shoukat Dedhar
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  The molecular biology of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  C René Leemans; Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Metabolic Alterations in Cancer and Their Potential as Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Jamie D Weyandt; Craig B Thompson; Amato J Giaccia; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

7.  A Variant of SLC1A5 Is a Mitochondrial Glutamine Transporter for Metabolic Reprogramming in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Hee Chan Yoo; Seung Joon Park; Miso Nam; Juwon Kang; Kibum Kim; Joo Hye Yeo; Joon-Ki Kim; Yunkyung Heo; Hee Seung Lee; Myeong Youl Lee; Chang Woo Lee; Jong Soon Kang; Yun-Hee Kim; Jinu Lee; Junjeong Choi; Geum-Sook Hwang; Seungmin Bang; Jung Min Han
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  CXCR7 promotes migration and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling.

Authors:  Nayoung Kim; Hyewon Ryu; Solbi Kim; Mina Joo; Heung Jin Jeon; Myung-Won Lee; Ik-Chan Song; Mi-Na Kim; Jin-Man Kim; Hyo Jin Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  ALCAT1 Overexpression Affects Supercomplex Formation and Increases ROS in Respiring Mitochondria.

Authors:  Bettina Rieger; Adéla Krajčová; Patrick Duwe; Karin B Busch
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Targeting FAT1 Inhibits Carcinogenesis, Induces Oxidative Stress and Enhances Cisplatin Sensitivity through Deregulation of LRP5/WNT2/GSS Signaling Axis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tung-Nien Hsu; Chih-Ming Huang; Chin-Sheng Huang; Mao-Suan Huang; Chi-Tai Yeh; Tsu-Yi Chao; Oluwaseun Adebayo Bamodu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  1 in total

1.  Major ceRNA regulation and key metabolic signature analysis of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Shuai Cao; Jie Li; Kai Yang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.