| Literature DB >> 33456325 |
MaŁgorzata Janeczko-Czarnecka1, Blanka Rybka1, Renata Ryczan-Krawczyk1, Krzysztof KaŁwak1, Marek Ussowicz1.
Abstract
Thymic output was studied prospectively in 52 children who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Thymic activity was assessed by quantification of recent thymic emigrants (RTE) discriminated from the rest of naive T cells by immunophenotype CD3+/CD4+/CD31+/CD45RA+. Thymic output was analyzed in correlation with the kinetics of immune recovery and in relation to other potential risk factors that may influence thymopoiesis: underlying disease, type of HSCT, source of stem cells, age of recipient and donor, type of conditioning, implemented graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, viral reactivations (herpes viruses cytomegalovirus - CMV, Epstein-Barr virus - EBV, adenovirus - ADV, BK virus - BKV), occurrence and grade of both acute and chronic graft versus host disease (aGvHD, cGvHD) and number of transplanted CD34 cells/kg. The absolute count of RTE in peripheral blood was evaluated at 6 time points: before the conditioning and on days +15, +30, +60 , +90 and +180 after HSCT. Occurrence of grade II-IV aGvHD was the most important factor associated with low RTE counts after HSCT. History of malignant disease, and transplantation from matched unrelated donor were risk factors for lower thymic output. We found a weak inverse correlation between the age of the recipient and thymic output on post-HSCT day +180. Source of stem cells, type of conditioning, viral reactivations, occurrence of chronic GvHD, age of the donor and the number of transplanted CD34 cells/kg did not affect thymopoiesis in our study group. These preliminary findings and identification of risk factors for deterioration of thymic activity may in the future help in selecting candidates for thymus rejuvenation strategies.Entities:
Keywords: graft versus host disease; immune recovery; pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; recent thymic emigrants; thymic activity; thymopoiesis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33456325 PMCID: PMC7792432 DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2019.89843
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Eur J Immunol ISSN: 1426-3912 Impact factor: 2.085
Characteristics of the study group
| Patients | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 35 | 67 | |
| Female | 17 | 33 | |
| Type of donor | |||
| Matched unrelated (MUD) | 40 | 77 | |
| Matched family (MFD) | 12 | 23 | |
| Source of stem cells | |||
| Peripheral blood (PB) | 42 | 81 | |
| Bone marrow (BM) | 7 | 13 | |
| Cord blood (CB) | 3 | 6 | |
| Diagnosis | |||
| Malignant | 30 | 58 | |
| Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) | 14 | 27 | |
| Acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) | 8 | 15 | |
| Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) | 3 | 6 | |
| Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) | 2 | 4 | |
| Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) | 1 | 2 | |
| Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) | 1 | 2 | |
| Osteomyelofibrosis | 1 | 2 | |
| Non-malignant | 22 | 42 | |
| Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) | 5 | 9 | |
| Metabolic diseases | 6 | 12 | |
| Immune deficiencies (ID*) | 12 | 21 | |
| Conditioning | |||
| Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) | 26 | 50 | |
| Myeloablative (MA) | 21 | 40 | |
| Non-myeloablative (NMA) | 5 | 10 | |
| Graft versus host disease prophylaxis | |||
| Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) | 42 | 81 | |
| Without ATG | 10 | 19 | |
Fig. 1Gating strategy for CD3+CD4+CD31+CD45RA+. Gating was performed on lymphocytes (purity > 98%) using Multitest 6-Color TBNK. The population of CD3+ cells (gate P3) was analyzed for expression of CD45RA+ CD4+ (gate P4). In the next step the population of CD3+CD4+CD45RA+ was analyzed for expression of CD31 (gate P5)
Median values of RTEs at defined time points (lymphocyte count: cells/µl). Asterisks represent significant differences between groups (*p < 0.05)
| Parameter | pre-HSCT | day +15 | day +30 | day +60 | day +90 | day +180 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of donor | |||||||
| MUD | 428.4 | 19.5* | 11.5* | 9.0* | 10.5* | 68.5* | |
| MFD | 149.4 | 84.3* | 338.9* | 73.8* | 133.4* | 173.6* | |
| Source of stem cells | |||||||
| PB | 388.7 | 40.4 | 102.5 | 24.4 | 35.5 | 85.2 | |
| BM | 191.5 | 12.5 | 31.4 | 25.8 | 51.9 | 134.8 | |
| CB | 408.7 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 13.3 | 1.0 | 23.4 | |
| Diagnosis | |||||||
| Malignant | 164.6* | 36.8 | 145.9* | 34.3 | 54.6* | 107.1 | |
| Non-malignant | 634.0* | 31.2 | 6.9* | 9.8 | 10.1* | 58.9 | |
| Conditioning regimen | |||||||
| RIC | 327.0 | 29.9 | 21.3 | 13.7 | 17.9 | 103.4 | |
| MA | 345.7 | 46.1 | 188.5 | 39.5 | 67.1 | 84.5 | |
| NMA | 632.2 | 9.1 | 5.7 | 11.8 | 5.3 | 23.5 | |
| ATG | |||||||
| Yes | 447.5 | 16.4* | 14.7* | 11.8* | 16.9* | 70.7 | |
| No | 75.3 | 97.7* | 391.0* | 76.0* | 133.1* | 177.6 | |
| Viral reactivation | |||||||
| CMV (+) | 591.7 | 54.0 | 23.2 | 20.9 | 38.4 | 53.3 | |
| CMV (–) | 266.2 | 21.8 | 120.9 | 25.5 | 34.8 | 103.1 | |
| EBV (+) | 767.8 | 4.8 | 8.3 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 86.0 | |
| EBV (–) | 353.8 | 35.5 | 33.0 | 25.8 | 39.0 | 88.3 | |
| ADV (+) | 292.0 | 9.8 | 28.2 | 22.4 | 40.7 | 45.4 | |
| ADV (–) | 396.1 | 37.5 | 97.8 | 24.2 | 35.2 | 95.0 | |
| BKV (+) | 355.4 | 19.7 | 49.4 | 27.1 | 51.0 | 49.7 | |
| BKV (–) | 382.4 | 34.8 | 104.6 | 23.5 | 33.9 | 94.3 | |
| aGvHD | |||||||
| Yes | 458.8 | 33.9 | 19.9* | 18.1 | 25.9* | 45.7* | |
| No | 253.3 | 31.4 | 186.2* | 33.3 | 52.6* | 152.9* | |
| aGvHD grade | |||||||
| 0-I | 315.2 | 25.2 | 128.7* | 25.7 | 35.6 | 102.6* | |
| II-IV | 489.3 | 46.3 | 14.8* | 22.1 | 38.8 | 63.6* | |
| cGvHD | |||||||
| Yes | 333.8 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 8.3 | 6.8 | 32.2 | |
| No | 463.7 | 18.4 | 16.3 | 12.3 | 18.1 | 76.9 | |
Fig. 2Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT according to type of the transplant (MFD, MUD). Dots represent mean values of RTEs while whiskers represent standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 3Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT according GvHD prophylaxis (with vs. without ATG). Dots represent mean values of RTEs while whiskers represent standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 4Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT with reference to underlying disease (malignant or non-malignant). Dots represent mean values of RTEs while whiskers represent standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 5Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT according to occurrence of aGvHD (with vs. without aGvHD). Dots represent mean values of RTEs while whiskers represent standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 6Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT according to grade of aGvHD (grade 0-I vs. grade II-IV). Dots represent mean values of RTEs while whiskers represent standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 7. Reconstitution of RTEs after allogenic HSCT at post-transplant day +180 in accordance to the age of the recipient