| Literature DB >> 33456260 |
Abstract
CONTEXT: The diagnosis and grading of epithelial dysplasia is based on a combination of architectural and cytological changes. A gradual increase in quantitative DNA aberrations has been found to correlate with increasing degree of dysplasia in oral mucous membranes. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assess nuclear parameters in potentially malignant and malignant lesions of the oral cavity and to assess cytomorphometric changes in the nucleus and nucleolus in oral epithelial dysplasia (OED), oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and normal oral mucosa using methyl green-pyronin staining to determine its suitability for detecting potentially malignant lesions and the stage of carcinogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Dysplasia; methyl green-pyronin; nucleolus; nucleus; oral submucous fibrosis; squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33456260 PMCID: PMC7802838 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_360_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1Photomicrograph of methyl green-pyronin-stained section of normal oral mucosa showed nuclei with regular nuclear membrane outlines and round symmetrical nucleoli, with cytoplasm showing even staining of pyronin (Original magnification, ×1000)
Figure 5The mean nuclear area increased from normal mucosa through squamous cell carcinoma. Dysplastic mucosa and oral submucous fibrosis showed little variance
Figure 8Mean number of nucleoli showed significant variance among the four groups with highest among squamous cell carcinoma and lowest in normal mucosa
Results obtained from analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s post hoctest
| Parameter | Group | N | Mean | SD | SE | 95% CI | Min | Max | Sig. diff. | P-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||||||
| Nuclear area | Normal mucosa | 52 | 73.708 | 6.995 | 0.970 | 71.760 | 75.655 | 56.510 | 89.120 | <0.001* | S vs D | <0.001* |
| Dysplastic mucosa | 58 | 102.039 | 17.536 | 2.303 | 97.428 | 106.650 | 78.580 | 148.970 | S vs N | <0.001* | ||
| OSMF | 69 | 102.777 | 16.340 | 1.967 | 98.851 | 106.702 | 69.630 | 134.240 | S vs O | <0.001* | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 62 | 126.925 | 9.481 | 1.204 | 124.517 | 129.333 | 101.040 | 143.400 | ||||
| Nucleolar area | Normal mucosa | 60 | 41.682 | 6.411 | 0.828 | 40.026 | 43.338 | 30.090 | 55.300 | <0.001* | S vs D | <0.001* |
| Dysplastic mucosa | 83 | 69.157 | 5.545 | 0.609 | 67.947 | 70.368 | 53.850 | 79.290 | S vs N | <0.001* | ||
| OSMF | 77 | 73.708 | 3.090 | 0.352 | 73.007 | 74.410 | 63.030 | 79.810 | S vs O | <0.001* | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 75 | 92.116 | 3.805 | 0.439 | 91.240 | 92.991 | 81.460 | 99.390 | ||||
| RNA | Normal mucosa | 48 | 65.288 | 13.455 | 1.942 | 61.380 | 69.195 | 47.640 | 98.570 | <0.001* | S vs D | <0.001* |
| Dysplastic mucosa | 42 | 79.628 | 11.838 | 1.827 | 75.939 | 83.317 | 67.350 | 110.990 | S vs N | <0.001* | ||
| OSMF | 49 | 82.571 | 12.729 | 1.818 | 78.915 | 86.227 | 59.380 | 114.910 | S vs O | <0.001* | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 40 | 102.266 | 8.277 | 1.309 | 99.619 | 104.914 | 91.240 | 123.700 | ||||
| Nucleoli | Normal mucosa | 19 | 3.32 | 0.946 | 0.217 | 2.86 | 3.77 | 2 | 5 | <0.001* | S vs D | <0.001* |
| Dysplastic mucosa | 19 | 5.89 | 1.329 | 0.305 | 5.25 | 6.54 | 3 | 8 | S vs N | <0.001* | ||
| OSMF | 19 | 7.26 | 0.933 | 0.214 | 6.81 | 7.71 | 6 | 9 | S vs O | <0.001* | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 19 | 14.79 | 1.843 | 0.423 | 13.9 | 15.68 | 12 | 18 | ||||
OSMF: Oral submucous fibrosis. S: Oral squamous cell carcinoma, D: Oral dysplasia, N: Normal oral mucosa, O: Oral submucous fibrosis. *P<0.001=Statistically significant