| Literature DB >> 33456238 |
Hyandavi Balla1, Divya Uppala1, Sumit Majumdar1, Sreekanth Kotina1, Sravya Kodati1, Madhurya Namana1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Immunomorphological patterns of Lymph Nodes indirectly assess the host immune response facing a malignant tumor. These patterns also help us predict the susceptibility of the patient to Lymph Node Metastasis. AIMS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Immunomorphological patterns; lymph node; metastasis; oral squamous cell carcinoma; tumor node metastasis staging
Year: 2020 PMID: 33456238 PMCID: PMC7802857 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_36_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1(a) Grossing images of excised lymph nodes. (b) Separated lymph nodes
Figure 2Lymphocyte predominance pattern (×10 view)
Figure 3Germinal center predominance pattern (×10 view)
Figure 4Sinus histiocytosis pattern (×10 view)
Figure 5Lymphocyte-depleted pattern (×10 view)
Figure 6Grade 2 metastasis of lymph node (×10 view)
Figure 7Grade 3 metastasis of lymph node (×10 view)
Figure 8Grade 4 metastasis of lymph node (×20 view)
Statistical association between size and immunomorphological pattern
| Size | LP (%) | GCP (%) | SH (%) | LD (%) | US (%) | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 cm or <2 cm | 8 (50) | 1 (8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (23) |
| >2 cm but <4 cm | 3 (19) | 5 (42) | 12 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 20 (50) |
| >4 cm | 5 (31) | 6 (50) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 (28) |
χ2: 24.03, P<0.01 (highly significant). LP: Lymphocytic predominance, GCP: Germinal Center Predominance, SH: Sinus Histiocytosis, LD: Lymphocytic Depleted, US: Unstimulated
Statistical association between tumor-nodemetastasis staging and immunomorphological pattern
| Stages | LP (%) | GCP (%) | SH (%) | LD (%) | US (%) | Total (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | 8 (50) | 1 (8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (23) |
| Stage 2 | 3 (19) | 5 (42) | 12 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 20 (50) |
| Stage 3 | 5 (31) | 6 (50) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 (28) |
| Stage 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
χ2: 24.03, P<0.01 (highly significant). LP: Lymphocytic predominance, GCP: Germinal center predominance, SH: Sinus histiocytosis, LD: Lymphocytic depleted, US: Unstimulated
Statistical association between histopathological grade of primary tumor and immunomorphological pattern
| Grading | LP (%) | GCP (%) | SH (%) | LD (%) | Us (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Well | 16 (100) | 1 (8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Moderately | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 12 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Poorly | 0 (0) | 11 (92) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| 16 (100) | 12 (100) | 12 (100) | 0 (100) | 0 (100) |
χ2: 74.51, P<0.01 (highly significant). LP: Lymphocytic predominance, GCP: Germinal center predominance, SH: Sinus histiocytosis, LD: Lymphocytic depleted, US: Unstimulated
Statistical association between immunomorphological pattern and metastasis of lymph node
| Pattern | Metastasis (%) | Nonmetastasis (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LP | 5 (29.41) | 11 (47.83) | 0.240 |
| GCP | 9 (52.94) | 3 (13.04) | 0.140 |
| SH | 3 (17.65) | 9 (39.13) | 0.000 |
| LD | 0 | 0 | - |
| US | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total | 17 (100.00) | 23 (100.00) |
LP: Lymphocytic predominance, GCP: Germinal Center Predominance, SH: Sinus Histiocytosis, LD: Lymphocytic Depleted, US: Unstimulated
Graph 1Immunomorphological pattern and metastasis of lymph node
Figure 9Lymphocyte predominance and metastasis (×10 view)
Figure 10Germinal center predominance and metastasis (×20 view)
Figure 11Sinus histiocytosis and metastasis (×20 view)
Immunomorphological pattern and grade of lymph node metastasis
| Metastasis grade | LP | GCP | SH | LD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 15 | 21 | 3 | 0 |
| Grade 3 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
χ2: 5.70, P=0.22 NS. NS: Not significant, LP: Lymphocytic predominance, GCP: Germinal Center Predominance, SH: Sinus Histiocytosis, LD: Lymphocytic Depleted