Literature DB >> 33456066

Latent Variable Modeling and Adaptive Testing for Experimental Cognitive Psychopathology Research.

Michael L Thomas1, Gregory G Brown2, Virginie M Patt3, John R Duffy1.   

Abstract

The adaptation of experimental cognitive tasks into measures that can be used to quantify neurocognitive outcomes in translational studies and clinical trials has become a key component of the strategy to address psychiatric and neurological disorders. Unfortunately, while most experimental cognitive tests have strong theoretical bases, they can have poor psychometric properties, leaving them vulnerable to measurement challenges that undermine their use in applied settings. Item response theory-based computerized adaptive testing has been proposed as a solution but has been limited in experimental and translational research due to its large sample requirements. We present a generalized latent variable model that, when combined with strong parametric assumptions based on mathematical cognitive models, permits the use of adaptive testing without large samples or the need to precalibrate item parameters. The approach is demonstrated using data from a common measure of working memory-the N-back task-collected across a diverse sample of participants. After evaluating dimensionality and model fit, we conducted a simulation study to compare adaptive versus nonadaptive testing. Computerized adaptive testing either made the task 36% more efficient or score estimates 23% more precise, when compared to nonadaptive testing. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that latent variable modeling and adaptive testing can be used in experimental cognitive testing even with relatively small samples. Adaptive testing has the potential to improve the impact and replicability of findings from translational studies and clinical trials that use experimental cognitive tasks as outcome measures.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cognitive assessment; cognitive psychometrics; computerized adaptive testing; experimental cognitive psychopathology; item response theory; neurocognitive disorders

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456066      PMCID: PMC7797961          DOI: 10.1177/0013164420919898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  26 in total

1.  The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Robert S Kern; Lyle E Baade; Deanna M Barch; Jonathan D Cohen; Susan Essock; Wayne S Fenton; Frederick J Frese; James M Gold; Terry Goldberg; Robert K Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Helena Kraemer; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Daniel R Weinberger; Alexander S Young; Steven Zalcman; Stephen R Marder
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  A signal detection-item response theory model for evaluating neuropsychological measures.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Victoria B Risbrough; Dewleen G Baker
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.

Authors:  Han L J van der Maas; Dylan Molenaar; Gunter Maris; Rogier A Kievit; Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.

Authors:  Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Critical Values for Yen's Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.

Authors:  Karl Bang Christensen; Guido Makransky; Mike Horton
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-11-16

6.  Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  D M Barch; C S Carter; T S Braver; F W Sabb; A MacDonald; D C Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03

7.  Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit.

Authors:  L J Chapman; J P Chapman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences.

Authors:  Craig Hedge; Georgina Powell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-06

9.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Andrew R A Conway; Timothy K Miura; Gregory J H Colflesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Scott W Woods
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  1 in total

1.  Detecting the Inverted-U in fMRI Studies of Schizophrenia: A Comparison of Three Analysis Methods.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; John R Duffy; Neal Swerdlow; Gregory A Light; Gregory G Brown
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.892

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.