PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the role of adjunctive, solely nonthrombolytic endovascular therapy in treatment of acute lower-extremity ischemia by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center evaluation of 165 patients (167 limbs) that underwent rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy between 2009 and 2016 was performed. RESULTS: Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was used as a single therapy in 9.0% (15 limbs), followed by percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy in 6.0% (10 limbs), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 19.8% (33 limbs) and stenting in 25.7% (43 limbs). Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was followed by any combination of these three interventions in 39.5%. Clinical and technical success was documented in 92.2%, complications in 10.3% (n=17). No significant difference in clinical and technical success was observed using rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone or with additional endovascular therapy. On a long-term basis, the re-ischemia-free survival was nearly twice as high as in previous studies that reported more cases treated by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone. CONCLUSION: To assure a long-lasting primary patency after percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, concomitant treatment of underlying lesions with adjunctive, nonthrombolytic endovascular methods should be considered.
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the role of adjunctive, solely nonthrombolytic endovascular therapy in treatment of acute lower-extremity ischemia by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center evaluation of 165 patients (167 limbs) that underwent rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy between 2009 and 2016 was performed. RESULTS: Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was used as a single therapy in 9.0% (15 limbs), followed by percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy in 6.0% (10 limbs), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 19.8% (33 limbs) and stenting in 25.7% (43 limbs). Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was followed by any combination of these three interventions in 39.5%. Clinical and technical success was documented in 92.2%, complications in 10.3% (n=17). No significant difference in clinical and technical success was observed using rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone or with additional endovascular therapy. On a long-term basis, the re-ischemia-free survival was nearly twice as high as in previous studies that reported more cases treated by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone. CONCLUSION: To assure a long-lasting primary patency after percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, concomitant treatment of underlying lesions with adjunctive, nonthrombolytic endovascular methods should be considered.
Authors: Nilesh Patel; David Sacks; Rajesh I Patel; Kenneth P Moresco; Kenneth Ouriel; Richard Gray; Walter T Ambrosius; Curtis A Lewis Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Frank M Davis; Jeremy Albright; Katherine A Gallagher; Hitinder S Gurm; Gerald C Koenig; Theodore Schreiber; P Michael Grossman; Peter K Henke Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: T Zehnder; M Birrer; D D Do; I Baumgartner; J Triller; B Nachbur; F Mahler Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Joddi Neff; Joseph P Broderick; Jane C Khoury; Janice Carrozzella; Thomas Tomsick Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-10-13 Impact factor: 7.914