Literature DB >> 33455578

Preparing for a "dirty bomb" attack: the optimum mix of medical countermeasure resources.

Alexis Rump1, Patrick Ostheim2, Stefan Eder2, Cornelius Hermann2, Michael Abend2, Matthias Port2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In radiological emergencies with radionuclide incorporation, decorporation treatment is particularly effective if started early. Treating all people potentially contaminated ("urgent treatment") may require large antidote stockpiles. An efficacious way to reduce antidote requirements is by using radioactivity screening equipment. We analyzed the suitability of such equipment for triage purposes and determined the most efficient mix of screening units and antidote daily doses.
METHODS: The committed effective doses corresponding to activities within the detection limits of monitoring portals and mobile whole-body counters were used to assess their usefulness as triage tools. To determine the optimal resource mix, we departed from a large-scale scenario (60,000 victims) and based on purchase prices of antidotes and screening equipment in Germany, we calculated efficiencies of different combinations of medical countermeasure resources by data envelopment analysis. Cost-effectiveness was expressed as the costs per life year saved and compared to risk reduction opportunities in other sectors of society as well as the values of a statistical life.
RESULTS: Monitoring portals are adequate instruments for a sensitive triage after cesium-137 exposure with a high screening throughput. For the detection of americium-241 whole-body counters with a lower daily screening capacity per unit are needed. Assuming that 1% of the potentially contaminated patients actually need decorporation treatment, an efficient resource mix includes 6 monitoring portals and 25 mobile whole-body counters. The optimum mix depends on price discounts and in particular the fraction of victims actually needing treatment. The cost-effectiveness of preparedness for a "dirty bomb" attack is less than for common health care, but costs for a life year saved are less than for many risk-reduction interventions in the environmental sector.
CONCLUSION: To achieve economic efficiency a high daily screening capacity is of major importance to substantially decrease the required amount of antidote doses. Among the determinants of the number of equipment units needed, the fraction of the potentially contaminated victims that actually needs treatment is the most difficult to assess. Judging cost-effectiveness of the preparedness for "dirty bomb" attacks is an issue of principle that must be dealt with by political leaders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data envelopment analysis; Decorporation treatment; Dirty bomb; Efficiency; Medical countermeasures; Radiological emergency; Radionuclide incorporation; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455578      PMCID: PMC7812656          DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00291-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med Res        ISSN: 2054-9369


  21 in total

1.  Children as vulnerable populations in radiological/nuclear events: discussion scenarios.

Authors:  Matthew Rodrigues; Joseph Chaput; Christopher Bellman; Tom Cousins
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  IMBA Professional Plus: a flexible approach to internal dosimetry.

Authors:  A Birchall; M Puncher; J W Marsh; K Davis; M R Bailey; N S Jarvis; A D Peach; M-D Dorrian; A C James
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Treatment of accidental intakes of plutonium and americium: guidance notes.

Authors:  F Ménétrier; L Grappin; P Raynaud; C Courtay; R Wood; S Joussineau; V List; G N Stradling; D M Taylor; Ph Bérard; M A Morcillo; J Rencova
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Requirements for estimation of doses from contaminants dispersed by a 'dirty bomb' explosion in an urban area.

Authors:  K G Andersson; T Mikkelsen; P Astrup; S Thykier-Nielsen; L H Jacobsen; S C Hoe; S P Nielsen
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 5.  Reconsidering Current Decorporation Strategies after Incorporation of Radionuclides.

Authors:  A Rump; D Stricklin; A Lamkowski; S Eder; M Abend; M Port
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Estimation of health hazards resulting from a radiological terrorist attack in a city.

Authors:  K G Andersson; T Mikkelsen; P Astrup; S Thykier-Nielsen; L H Jacobsen; L Schou-Jensen; S C Hoe; S P Nielsen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Considerations related to the decontamination of houses in Goiânia: limitations and implications.

Authors:  C J da Silva; J U Delgado; M T Luiz; P G Cunha; P D Barros
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 8.  Review of methods to measure internal contamination in an emergency.

Authors:  M J Youngman
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  Pregnancy care in Germany, France and Japan: an international comparison of quality and efficiency using structural equation modelling and data envelopment analysis.

Authors:  A Rump; O Schöffski
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Efficacy of Prussian blue on 137Cs decorporation therapy.

Authors:  D R Melo; J L Lipsztein; R Leggett; L Bertelli; R Guilmette
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elena Obrador; Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Juan I Villaescusa; Eduardo Gallego; Blanca Pellicer; José M Estrela; Alegría Montoro
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Estimation of radiation-induced health hazards from a "dirty bomb" attack with radiocesium under different assault and rescue conditions.

Authors:  Alexis Rump; Stefan Eder; Cornelius Hermann; Andreas Lamkowski; Patrick Ostheim; Michael Abend; Matthias Port
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2021-12-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.