Literature DB >> 33455009

Kidney allograft rejection: Diagnosis and treatment practices in USA- A UNOS survey.

Puneet Sood1, Wida S Cherikh2, Alice E Toll2, Rajil B Mehta1, Sundaram Hariharan1.   

Abstract

We studied diverse rejection management strategies across centers by conducting a UNOS survey of kidney transplant program directors in 2017. There were 104 total responses from 235 kidney transplant programs representing 88 unique transplant programs (response rate 37%). Information was collected on center-specific management practices. Pertinent center-specific data were obtained from the OPTN database. Of the respondents, 33% were considered large centers (>100 transplants/year). Thymoglobulin was the most commonly used induction agent at 84%, 72% responders do rapid steroid withdrawal, and mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the major antimetabolite (100%). For diagnosing TCMR, 100% used indication biopsy, 28% used protocol biopsy, 2% used serum biomarkers, and none used urine cytokines. For ABMR, 99% used indication biopsy, 34% used protocol biopsy, 72% used DSA, 21% used C1q positive DSA, and none used gene profiling (ENDATS). The treatment of subclinical and clinical TCMR included iv/PO steroids. PP/IVIG were the commonest treatments for ABMR. The use of rituximab, bortezomib, and eculizumab increased from C4D-ABMR to recurrent ABMR. There are diverse management practices for diagnosing and treating rejection. An effort to harmonize these diverse practices for management of TCMR and ABMR will give an opportunity to pool data for evaluating clinical outcomes.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS); biopsy; rejection; survey

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455009     DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  4 in total

1.  The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era.

Authors:  Christie Rampersad; Robert Balshaw; Ian W Gibson; Julie Ho; Jamie Shaw; Martin Karpinski; Aviva Goldberg; Patricia Birk; David N Rush; Peter W Nickerson; Chris Wiebe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 9.369

2.  High PIRCHE Scores May Allow Risk Stratification of Borderline Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Ekaterina Lezoeva; Jakob Nilsson; Rudolf Wüthrich; Thomas F Mueller; Thomas Schachtner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.561

3.  Effectiveness of T cell-mediated rejection therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Ho; George N Okoli; Rasheda Rabbani; Otto L T Lam; Viraj K Reddy; Nicole Askin; Christie Rampersad; Aaron Trachtenberg; Chris Wiebe; Peter Nickerson; Ahmed M Abou-Setta
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 9.369

4.  PIRCHE-II scores prove useful as a predictive biomarker among kidney transplant recipients with rejection: An analysis of indication and follow-up biopsies.

Authors:  Tahm Spitznagel; Laurenz S Matter; Yves L Kaufmann; Jakob Nilsson; Seraina von Moos; Thomas Schachtner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 8.786

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.