Literature DB >> 33455007

Comparative effectiveness of early-targeted use of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin among hospitalized veterans' affairs patients with infections due to Clostridioides difficile.

Nimish Patel1,2, Colleen Lowry2, Daralyn Morgenson2, Vaishali Shah2, Nicholas Stornelli3, Thomas P Lodise2,4.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare real-world effectiveness outcomes between hospitalized patients with Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) who received early-targeted fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin at two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs).
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed among hospitalized patients at two VAMCs from January 2008 until July 2017.
SETTING: Albany and Syracuse VAMCs. PATIENTS: Patients were included in this analysis if they were age ≥18 years; were hospitalized; had a CDI with a Hines Severity Score Index (SSI) ≥2; received oral vancomycin (January 2008-June 2014 at Albany or Syracuse VAMCs) or fidaxomicin (March 2012-July 2017 at Albany VAMC) within 5 days of positive CDI stool sample for ≥ 48 hours. INTERVENTION: Receipt of an oral vancomycin- or fidaxomicin-containing CDI regimen. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality and 60-day recurrence. MAIN
RESULTS: The study included 54 oral vancomycin and 38 fidaxomicin recipients. The population was predominantly male (97.8%), and mean ± standard deviation age was 74.6 ± 11.1 years. The composite outcome was significantly different between fidaxomicin and vancomycin recipients (26.3% fidaxomicin vs. 51.9% vancomycin; odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14-0.81, p = 0.01). This finding was maintained in the multivariate analysis after adjustment for confounders (adjusted OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.73, p = 0.01)
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world effectiveness study suggests that use of fidaxomicin potentially results in better outcomes relative to oral vancomycin for initial treatment of hospitalized VAMC patients with CDIs.
© 2021 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Clostridioides difficilezzm321990; fidaxomicin; mortality; outcomes; recurrence; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455007     DOI: 10.1002/phar.2503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and Economic Outcomes After Implementation of a Fidaxomicin Treatment Optimization and Access Pathway at a US Hospital System.

Authors:  Lauren F McDaniel; Melissa N White; Engels N Obi; Rose M Kohinke; Ellen Rachel S Lockhart; Damian J Chipriano; Yiyun Chen; Nathan A Everson
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 2.  Real-world comparison of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin or metronidazole in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianfeng Dai; Jing Gong; Rui Guo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Host gut resistome in Gulf War chronic multisymptom illness correlates with persistent inflammation.

Authors:  Dipro Bose; Somdatta Chatterjee; Ethan Older; Ratanesh Seth; Patricia Janulewicz; Punnag Saha; Ayan Mondal; Jeffrey M Carlson; Alan W Decho; Kimberly Sullivan; Nancy Klimas; Stephen Lasley; Jie Li; Saurabh Chatterjee
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  The Risk of Clostridioides difficile Recurrence after Initial Treatment with Vancomycin or Fidaxomicin Utilizing Cerner Health Facts.

Authors:  Ronald G Hall; Travis J Cole; Chip Shaw; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.