| Literature DB >> 33454574 |
Defu Qiu1, Yuhu Cheng2, Xuesong Wang3, Xiaoqiang Zhang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: Back-projection; Coronavirus disease; Dilated convolution; Multi-window; Residual networks; Super-resolution
Year: 2021 PMID: 33454574 PMCID: PMC7834190 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed ISSN: 0169-2607 Impact factor: 5.428
Fig. 1Single image super-resolution network architecture of deep network.
Fig. 2The architect of multi-window back-projection networks.
Fig. 3Comparisons of deep network super-resolution. (a) Predefined upsampling (e.g., VDSR [18], DRRN [18], SRCNN [9]). (b) Single upsampling (e.g., ESPCN [11], FSRCNN [10]). (c) Progressive upsampling uses a Laplacian pyramid network. (d) multi-window up-projection and down-projection rsidual module is proposed by our MWSR which uses the interconnected up- and down sampling stages to obtain many HR features of different depths.
The network architect setting of MWSR.
| Network module | Kernel size | Stride | Padding | Dialted rate | Input size | Output size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial layer | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | H*W*1 | H*W*64 | ||
| Residual block | Conv 1 | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*64 | |
| Conv 2 | 1*1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*4 | ||
| Conv 3 | 1*1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | H*W*4 | H*W*64 | ||
| Upblock | 1 | DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 |
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| 2 | DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | |
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| 3 | DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | |
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| Downblock | 1 | Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 |
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| 2 | Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | |
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| 3 | Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | |
| DeConv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*64 | H*W*128 | ||
| Conv | 4*4 | 2 | 7 | 5 | H*W*128 | H*W*64 | ||
| RB module | Conv 7 | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*64 | |
| Conv 8 | 1*1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*4 | ||
| Conv 9 | 1*1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | H*W*4 | H*W*64 | ||
| Middle layer | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | H*W*64 | ||
| Upscale | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | H*W*64 | 2H*2W*64 | ||
| Reconstruction layer | 3*3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2H*2W*64 | 2H*2W*1 | ||
Fig. 4Structure of up-projection model and down-projection model.
Fig. 5Structure of residual block model.
Fig. 6Upsampling process on the subpixel convolution layer.
Quantitative evaluation results of state-of-the-art SR methods: average PSNR and SSIM for scale factors (×2, ×3, ×4). Red numbers indicate the best and green numbers indicate the second-best performance.
Fig. 7Visual quality of the proposed MWSR and other state-of-art methods for 4× scale factor on COVID-19 CT images.