Literature DB >> 33454195

Comparison of consistency and complementarity of reporting biosimilar quality attributes between regulatory and scientific communities: An adalimumab case study.

Ali M Alsamil1, Thijs J Giezen2, Toine C Egberts3, Hubert G Leufkens4, Helga Gardarsdottir5.   

Abstract

Biosimilar approval relies on the comparability of quality attributes (QAs), for which information can be derived from regulatory or scientific communities. Limited information is known about whether these sources are consistent with or complementary to each other. The consistency and complementarity of QA reporting in biosimilarity assessments for adalimumab biosimilars approved by the European Medicines Agency in European public assessment reports (EPARs) and scientific publications was assessed. A classification of 77 different QAs (53 structural and 24 functional attributes) was used to assess the types of and information on QAs reported. Six adalimumab biosimilars were analyzed, for which the number of QAs reported in EPARs and publications varied (range = 47 [61%]-60 [78%]). The proportion of QAs consistently reported in both sources varied (range = 28%-75%) among biosimilars; functional QAs (mean = 21 QAs [88%]; range = 19-23) were more consistently reported than structural QAs (mean = 33 QAs [62%]; range = 27-34). The EPARs frequently reported biosimilarity interpretation without providing test results (9-57 QAs in EPARs versus 0-8 QAs in publications), whereas publications frequently reported both test results and interpretations (13-40 QAs in publications versus 0-3 QAs in EPARs). Both sources provided information on the biosimilarity of QAs in a complementary manner and the same biosimilarity interpretation of test results for reported QAs (mean = 90%; range = 78%-100%), with a small discrepancy in biosimilarity interpretations of a few clinically relevant QAs related to post-translation modifications and biological activity. Comprehensive reporting of QAs can contribute to an improved understanding of the role of structural and functional attributes in establishing biosimilarity and the mechanism of action of biological substances in general.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adalimumab; Biological drugs; Biosimilarity; Biosimilars; Comparability; European public assessment reports (EPARs); Monoclonal antibody; Quality attributes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33454195     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  1 in total

1.  Type and Extent of Information on (Potentially Critical) Quality Attributes Described in European Public Assessment Reports for Adalimumab Biosimilars.

Authors:  Ali M Alsamil; Thijs J Giezen; Toine C Egberts; Hubert G Leufkens; Helga Gardarsdottir
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.