| Literature DB >> 33454186 |
P S Swathi1, B R Raghavendra2, Apar Avinash Saoji2.
Abstract
Shatkarma, also known as Shatkriya are a set of six yogic cleansing techniques described in the Hatha Yoga texts. Several health benefits of these procedures are indicated in the traditional texts of Yoga. However, there is no comprehensive literature about the scientific evidence on Shatkriya. Hence, we searched in PubMed, PubMed Central and Google Scholar databases to review relevant articles in English. The search yielded a total 723 references, published from 1976 to April 2020. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 articles were included in this review. We found scientific studies on four out of six cleansing techniques. The limited evidence on Shatkriya suggests positive effects on various physiological and clinical domains. The practice of dhauti was found to enhance respiratory functions and was useful in digestive disorders. Nasal cleansing, neti was particularly found beneficial in managing the rhinosinusitis in age groups ranging from children to adults. Although trataka practice was found to enhance cognition and bring a state of relaxation, but there was no evidence supporting its role in eye disorders. Kapalabhati practice appears to have a beneficial role in the activation of sympathetic nervous system, enhance cognition, and improve overall metabolism. Further large-scale clinical trials with robust designs are warranted to evaluate the effects of Shatkriya in health and disease.Entities:
Keywords: Physiological effects; Shatkarma; Shatkriya; Yoga; Yogic cleansing technique
Year: 2021 PMID: 33454186 PMCID: PMC8039332 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2020.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Evidence summary on Dhauti.
| Author | Sample size | Study type and Duration of Intervention | Variables studied | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiran et al., 2019 [ | 60 (Experimental = 30, Control = 30) | RCT | Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score | Four sessions of |
| Balakrishnan et al., 2018 [ | 18 (Experienced = 9, naïve = 9) | Comparative Study between naïve and experienced practitioners. | Slow & forced vital capacity, Inspiratory & expiratory reserve volume, Respiratory rate & tidal volume | Improved respiratory functions were observed after |
| Haldavenkar et al., 2014 [ | 40 | Self as control study | Pain & disability, state anxiety, spine flexibility and straight leg raising | A single session of |
| Meshramkar et al., 2007 [ | 1 | Single case report | Tooth wear index of Smith & Knight | The regular practice of |
Evidence summary of Neti.
| Author | Sample size | Study type and duration of Intervention | Variables studied | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiwana et al., 2019 [ | 1 | Single case report | Nasal endoscopy | Vigorous practice of |
| Leydon et al., 2017 [ | 32 | Qualitative semi-structured interview study | Medication score, symptom checklist | |
| Little et al., 2016 [ | 871 (Usual care = 210, Nasal irrigation = 219, Steam inhalation = 232, Combined = 210) | RCT | Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) | |
| Lin et al., 2015 [ | 10 | Pre and Post study | Sinus & Nasal Quality of Life survey, Overall Nasal Quality of Life | |
| Luo et al., 2014 [ | 1134 (GroupA = Nasal irrigator, Group B = homemade nasal irrigation connector combined with enemator, Group C used nasal sprayer) | Follow up study | Sinus & Nasal Quality of Life survey | Long term use of |
| Liang et al., 2008 [ | 107 (Nasal irrigation = 44, Non irrigation = 63) | RCT | Questionnaire and radiological assessment of rhinosinusitis | The 6 months of follow up study of |
| Rabago et al., 2002 [ | 76 (Experimental = 52, Control = 24) | RCT | Medical outcome survey short form, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index, Single- Item- Sinus Symptom Severity assessment | |
| Heatley et al., 2001 [ | 150 (Nasal irrigation with bulb syringe = 43, nasal irrigation with irrigation pot = 39, & reflexology massage = 46) | RCT | Rhinosinusitis outcome measures, Daily medication use | |
| Shoseyov et al., 1998 [ | 30 (Hypertonic saline = 15, Normal saline = 15) | Randomized double blind study | Radiology score & nasal secretion, cough or postnasal drip for rhinosinusitis | There was significant reduction in nasal secretions, cough & postnasal drip in hypertonic solution group than |
| Georgitis; 1994 [ | 30 | Self as control study | Nasal secretions - histamine, prostaglandin D2, leukotriene C4 | |
| Ramalingam and Smith; 1990 [ | 1 | Single case report | Self-assessment of symptoms | Practice of |
Evidence summary of Trataka.
| Author & Year | Sample size | Study type and duration of Intervention | Variables studied | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiwari et al., 2018 [ | 48 (Trataka yoga kriya = 24, Eye exercise = 24) | Comparative study | Snellen’s Chart | |
| Raghavendra and Singh; 2016 [ | 30 | Self as control study | Stroop colour-word test | Improvement in selective attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition was found following |
| Talwadkar et al., 2014 [ | 60 (Trataka group = 36, control group = 24) | RCT | Digit span test, six letter cancellation test, trail making test | |
| Raghavendra and Ramamurthy; 2014 [ | 30 | Self as control study | Heart rate variability (HRV) & respiration rate | |
| Gopinathan et al., 2012 [ | 66 (Eye exercise = 32, | RCT | Signs and symptoms of presbyopia, retinoscopy, autorefractometer, keratometer | Both |
| Mallick and Kulkarni; 2010 [ | 30 | Self as control study | Critical Flicker fusion | After the practice of |