Jerrald Lau1,2, David Hsien-Yung Tan3,4, Gretel Jianlin Wong1,2, Yii-Jen Lew3, Ying-Xian Chua3, Lian-Leng Low4,5,6, Han-Kwee Ho7, Thiam-Soo Kwek8, Sue-Anne Ee-Shiow Toh2,9, Ker-Kan Tan10,11. 1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre (SPHERiC), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 3. National University Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore. 4. College of Family Physicians Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Family Medicine and Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. 6. Outram Community Hospital, SingHealth Community Hospitals, Singapore, Singapore. 7. Regional Health System Office, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 8. Primary Care Network, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 9. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. 10. Singapore Population Health Improvement Centre (SPHERiC), National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. surtkk@nus.edu.sg. 11. Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. surtkk@nus.edu.sg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are first points-of-contact between suspected cases and the healthcare system in the current COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines PCPs' concerns, impact on personal lives and work, and level of pandemic preparedness in the context of COVID-19 in Singapore. We also examine factors and coping strategies that PCPs have used to manage stress during the outbreak. METHODS: Two hundred and sixteen PCPs actively practicing in either a public or private clinic were cluster sampled via email invitation from three primary care organizations in Singapore from 6th to 29th March 2020. Participants completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire consisting of items on work- and non-work-related concerns, impact on personal and work life, perceived pandemic preparedness, stress-reduction factors, and personal coping strategies related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 158 questionnaires were usable for analyses. PCPs perceived themselves to be at high risk of COVID-19 infection (89.9%), and a source of risk (74.7%) and concern (71.5%) to loved ones. PCPs reported acceptance of these risks (91.1%) and the need to care for COVID-19 patients (85.4%). Overall perceived pandemic preparedness was extremely high (75.9 to 89.9%). PCPs prioritized availability of personal protective equipment, strict infection prevention guidelines, accessible information about COVID-19, and well-being of their colleagues and family as the most effective stress management factors. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs continue to serve willingly on the frontlines of this pandemic despite the high perception of risk to themselves and loved ones. Healthcare organizations should continue to support PCPs by managing both their psychosocial (e.g. stress management) and professional (e.g. pandemic preparedness) needs.
BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are first points-of-contact between suspected cases and the healthcare system in the current COVID-19 pandemic. This study examines PCPs' concerns, impact on personal lives and work, and level of pandemic preparedness in the context of COVID-19 in Singapore. We also examine factors and coping strategies that PCPs have used to manage stress during the outbreak. METHODS: Two hundred and sixteen PCPs actively practicing in either a public or private clinic were cluster sampled via email invitation from three primary care organizations in Singapore from 6th to 29th March 2020. Participants completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire consisting of items on work- and non-work-related concerns, impact on personal and work life, perceived pandemic preparedness, stress-reduction factors, and personal coping strategies related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 158 questionnaires were usable for analyses. PCPs perceived themselves to be at high risk of COVID-19infection (89.9%), and a source of risk (74.7%) and concern (71.5%) to loved ones. PCPs reported acceptance of these risks (91.1%) and the need to care for COVID-19patients (85.4%). Overall perceived pandemic preparedness was extremely high (75.9 to 89.9%). PCPs prioritized availability of personal protective equipment, strict infection prevention guidelines, accessible information about COVID-19, and well-being of their colleagues and family as the most effective stress management factors. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs continue to serve willingly on the frontlines of this pandemic despite the high perception of risk to themselves and loved ones. Healthcare organizations should continue to support PCPs by managing both their psychosocial (e.g. stress management) and professional (e.g. pandemic preparedness) needs.
Authors: Teck Yee Wong; Gerald C H Koh; Seng Kwing Cheong; Meena Sundram; Kelvin Koh; Sin Eng Chia; David Koh Journal: Ann Acad Med Singap Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Michael S Krasner; Ronald M Epstein; Howard Beckman; Anthony L Suchman; Benjamin Chapman; Christopher J Mooney; Timothy E Quill Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mostafa A Abolfotouh; Ali A AlQarni; Suliman M Al-Ghamdi; Mahmoud Salam; Mohammed H Al-Assiri; Hanan H Balkhy Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Claire Collins; Esther Van Poel; Milena Šantrić Milićević; Katica Tripkovic; Limor Adler; Torunn Bjerve Eide; Liubove Murauskiene; Adam Windak; Katarzyna Nessler; Bernard Tahirbegolli; Sara Willems Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: S Vivek Anand; Yao Kang Shuy; Poay Sian Sabrina Lee; Eng Sing Lee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Marina Maffoni; Elena Fiabane; Ilaria Setti; Sara Martelli; Caterina Pistarini; Valentina Sommovigo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 4.614