| Literature DB >> 33453673 |
Sandra Z Mwebe1, Christina Yoon2, Lucy Asege1, Martha Nakaye1, Jane Katende3, Alfred Andama4, Adithya Cattamanchi2, Fred C Semitala5.
Abstract
Point-of-care C-reactive protein (POC CRP) testing is a potential tuberculosis (TB) screening tool for people living with HIV (PLHIV). Unlike lab-based assays, POC assays do not routinely adjust CRP levels for hematocrit, potentially resulting in TB screening status misclassification. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of unadjusted and hematocrit-adjusted POC CRP for culture-confirmed TB among PLHIV with CD4 cell-count ≤350 cells/uL initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. We prospectively enrolled consecutive adults, measured POC CRP (Boditech; normal <8 mg/L), collected two spot sputum specimens for comprehensive TB testing, and extracted pre-ART hematocrit from clinic records. Of the 605 PLHIV included, hematocrit-adjusted POC CRP had similar sensitivity (80% vs 81%, difference +1% [95% CI -3 to +5], P= 0.56) and specificity (71% vs 71%, difference 0% [95% CI -1 to +1], P= 0.56) for culture-confirmed TB, relative to unadjusted POC CRP. When used for TB screening, POC CRP may not require adjustment for hematocrit. However, larger studies may be required if differences close to the clinically meaningful threshold are to be detected.Entities:
Keywords: C-reactive protein; Haematocrit; PLHIV; Point of care; Screening; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33453673 PMCID: PMC8915862 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803