Literature DB >> 33453561

Animal movement in a pastoralist population in the Maasai Mara Ecosystem in Kenya and implications for pathogen spread and control.

George P Omondi1, Vincent Obanda2, Kimberly VanderWaal3, John Deen3, Dominic A Travis3.   

Abstract

Livestock movements are important drivers for infectious disease transmission. However, paucity of such data in pastoralist communities in rangeland ecosystems limits our understanding of their dynamics and hampers disease surveillance and control. The aim of this study was to investigate animal movement networks in a pastoralist community in Kenya, and assess network-based strategies for disease control. We used network analysis to characterize five types of between-village animal movement networks. We then evaluated implications of these networks for disease spread and control by quantifying topological changes in the network associated with targeted and random removal of nodes. To construct these networks, data were collected using standardized questionnaires (N = 165 households) from communities living within the Maasai Mara Ecosystem in southwestern Kenya. Our analyses show that the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR), a protected wildlife area, was critical for maintaining village connectivity in the agistment network (dry season grazing), with MMNR-adjacent villages being highly utilized during the dry season. In terms of disease dynamics, the network-based basic reproduction number, R0, was sufficient to allow disease invasion in all the five networks, and removal of villages based on degree or betweenness was not efficient in reducing R0. However, we show that villages with high degree or betweenness may play an important role in maintaining network connectivity, which may not be captured by assessment of R0 alone. Such villages may function as potential "firebreaks." For example, targeted removal of highly connected village nodes was more effective at fragmenting each network than random removal of nodes, indicating that network-based targeting of interventions such as vaccination could potentially disrupt transmission pathways in the ecosystem. In conclusion, this work shows that animal movements have the potential to shape patterns of disease transmission in this ecosystem, with targeted interventions being a practical and efficient measure for disease control.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal movement; Disease control; Fragmentation index; Network analysis; Pastoralist Mobility; Pathogen spread

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33453561      PMCID: PMC8787859          DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  55 in total

1.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain.

Authors:  R R Kao; L Danon; D M Green; I Z Kiss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Heterogeneities in the transmission of infectious agents: implications for the design of control programs.

Authors:  M E Woolhouse; C Dye; J F Etard; T Smith; J D Charlwood; G P Garnett; P Hagan; J L Hii; P D Ndhlovu; R J Quinnell; C H Watts; S K Chandiwana; R M Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Seroprevalence of foot-and-mouth disease virus in cattle herds raised in Maasai Mara ecosystem in Kenya.

Authors:  Daniel Nthiwa; Bernard Bett; David Odongo; Eucharia Kenya; Martin Wainaina; Santina Grazioli; Efrem Foglia; Emiliana Brocchi; Silvia Alonso
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  Characterization of swine movements in the United States and implications for disease control.

Authors:  A C Kinsley; A M Perez; M E Craft; K L Vanderwaal
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  Using Social Network Measures in Wildlife Disease Ecology, Epidemiology, and Management.

Authors:  Matthew J Silk; Darren P Croft; Richard J Delahay; David J Hodgson; Mike Boots; Nicola Weber; Robbie A McDonald
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 8.589

6.  Sheep movement networks and the transmission of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Victoriya V Volkova; Richard Howey; Nicholas J Savill; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Network analysis of cattle movements in Uruguay: Quantifying heterogeneity for risk-based disease surveillance and control.

Authors:  Kimberly L VanderWaal; Catalina Picasso; Eva A Enns; Meggan E Craft; Julio Alvarez; Federico Fernandez; Andres Gil; Andres Perez; Scott Wells
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.670

8.  Identifying outbreaks of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea virus through animal movements and spatial neighborhoods.

Authors:  Gustavo Machado; Carles Vilalta; Mariana Recamonde-Mendoza; Cesar Corzo; Montserrat Torremorell; Andrez Perez; Kimberly VanderWaal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence.

Authors:  J O Lloyd-Smith; S J Schreiber; P E Kopp; W M Getz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The topology of between-herd cattle contacts in a mixed farming production system in western Kenya.

Authors:  J Ogola; E M Fèvre; G K Gitau; R Christley; G Muchemi; W A de Glanville
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing usage of antimicrobial drugs among pastoralists in Kenya.

Authors:  Dennis N Makau; Ilya Slizovskiy; Kimberly VanderWaal; George P Omondi; Vincent Obanda; Noelle R Noyes; James R Johnson; Michael Oakes; Dominic Travis
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.893

2.  Multiple species animal movements: network properties, disease dynamics and the impact of targeted control actions.

Authors:  Nicolas C Cardenas; Abagael L Sykes; Francisco P N Lopes; Gustavo Machado
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.683

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.