Literature DB >> 33453506

Artificial intelligence in the medical physics community: An international survey.

Oliver Diaz1, Gabriele Guidi2, Oleksandra Ivashchenko3, Niall Colgan4, Federica Zanca5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess current perceptions, practices and education needs pertaining to artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical physics field.
METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to the European Federation of Organizations for Medical Physics (EFOMP) through social media and email membership list. The survey included questions about education, personal knowledge, needs, research and professionalism around AI in medical physics. Demographics information were also collected. Responses were stratified and analysed by gender, type of institution and years of experience in medical physics. Statistical significance (p<0.05) was assessed using paired t-test.
RESULTS: 219 people from 31 countries took part in the survey. 81% (n = 177) of participants agreed that AI will improve the daily work of Medical Physics Experts (MPEs) and 88% (n = 193) of respondents expressed the need for MPEs of specific training on AI. The average level of AI knowledge among participants was 2.3 ± 1.0 (mean ± standard deviation) in a 1-to-5 scale and 96% (n = 210) of participants showed interest in improving their AI skills. A significantly lower AI knowledge was observed for female participants (2.0 ± 1.0), compared to male responders (2.4 ± 1.0). 64% of participants indicated that they are not involved in AI projects. The percentage of female leading AI projects was significantly lower than the male counterparts (3% vs 19%).
CONCLUSIONS: AI was perceived as a positive resource to support MPEs in their daily tasks. Participants demonstrated a strong interest in improving their current AI-related skills, enhancing the need for dedicated training for MPEs.
Copyright © 2020 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Medical physics; Medical technology; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33453506     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  4 in total

1.  Classification of clinically relevant intravascular volume status using point of care ultrasound and machine learning.

Authors:  Safwan Wshah; Beilei Xu; John Steinharter; Clifford Reilly; Katelin Morrissette
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-09-30

2.  Comment on Patel, B.; Makaryus, A.N. Artificial Intelligence Advances in the World of Cardiovascular Imaging. Healthcare 2022, 10, 154.

Authors:  Daniele Giansanti
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

3.  The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 2: Towards an Investigation of acceptance and consensus on the Insiders.

Authors:  Francesco Di Basilio; Gianluca Esposisto; Lisa Monoscalco; Daniele Giansanti
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 4.  The Artificial Intelligence in Digital Radiology: Part 1: The Challenges, Acceptance and Consensus.

Authors:  Daniele Giansanti; Francesco Di Basilio
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.