Literature DB >> 33453434

Comparative evaluation of two methods for LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues.

Katarina Davalieva1, Sanja Kiprijanovska2, Aleksandar Dimovski3, Gorazd Rosoklija4, Andrew J Dwork5.   

Abstract

The proteomics of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples has advanced significantly during the last two decades, but there are many protocols and few studies comparing them directly. There is no consensus on the most effective protocol for shotgun proteomic analysis. We compared the in-solution digestion with RapiGest and Filter Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) of FFPE prostate tissues stored 7 years and mirroring fresh frozen samples, using two label-free data-independent LC-MS/MS acquisitions. RapiGest identified more proteins than FASP, with almost identical numbers of proteins from fresh and FFPE tissues and 69% overlap, good preservation of high-MW proteins, no bias regarding isoelectric point, and greater technical reproducibility. On the other hand, FASP yielded 20% fewer protein identifications in FFPE than in fresh tissue, with 64-69% overlap, depletion of proteins >70 kDa, lower efficiency in acidic and neutral range, and lower technical reproducibility. Both protocols showed highly similar subcellular compartments distribution, highly similar percentages of extracted unique peptides from FFPE and fresh tissues and high positive correlation between the absolute quantitation values of fresh and FFPE proteins. In conclusion, RapiGest extraction of FFPE tissues delivers a proteome that closely resembles the fresh frozen proteome and should be preferred over FASP in biomarker and quantification studies. SIGNIFICANCE: Here we analyzed the performance of two sample preparation methods for shotgun proteomic analysis of FFPE tissues to give a comprehensive overview of the obtained proteomes and the resemblance to its matching fresh frozen counterparts. These findings give us better understanding towards competent proteomics analysis of FFPE tissues. It is hoped that it will encourage further assessments of available protocols before establishing the most effective protocol for shotgun proteomic FFPE tissue analysis.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FASP; FFPE; LC-MS/MS; Label-free data-independent acquisition; Protein extraction; RapiGest

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33453434      PMCID: PMC7900714          DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2021.104117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  59 in total

1.  Proteome, phosphoproteome, and N-glycoproteome are quantitatively preserved in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue and analyzable by high-resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Paweł Ostasiewicz; Dorota F Zielinska; Matthias Mann; Jacek R Wiśniewski
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Development of efficient protein extraction methods for shotgun proteome analysis of formalin-fixed tissues.

Authors:  Xiaogang Jiang; Xinning Jiang; Shun Feng; Ruijun Tian; Mingliang Ye; Hanfa Zou
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Proteomics biomarkers for solid tumors: Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Iwona Belczacka; Agnieszka Latosinska; Jochen Metzger; David Marx; Antonia Vlahou; Harald Mischak; Maria Frantzi
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Generation of high-quality protein extracts from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Maria Filippa Addis; Alessandro Tanca; Daniela Pagnozzi; Salvatore Crobu; Giuseppe Fanciulli; Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Sergio Uzzau
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Extraction and analysis of diagnostically useful proteins from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Authors:  K Ikeda; T Monden; T Kanoh; M Tsujie; H Izawa; A Haba; T Ohnishi; M Sekimoto; N Tomita; H Shiozaki; M Monden
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Optimized Protocol for Quantitative Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Based Proteomic Analysis of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  Jacob J Kennedy; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Regine M Schoenherr; Ping Yan; Kimberly Allison; Melissa Shipley; Melissa Lerch; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Geoffrey Stuart Baird; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  A streamlined mass spectrometry-based proteomics workflow for large scale FFPE tissue analysis.

Authors:  Fabian Coscia; Sophia Doll; Jacob Mathias Bech; Lisa Schweizer; Andreas Mund; Ernst Lengyel; Jan Lindebjerg; Gunvor Iben Madsen; José M A Moreira; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Evaluation of archival time on shotgun proteomics of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  Brian M Balgley; Tong Guo; Kejia Zhao; Xueping Fang; Fattaneh A Tavassoli; Cheng S Lee
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Pressure-assisted protein extraction: a novel method for recovering proteins from archival tissue for proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Carol B Fowler; Timothy J Waybright; Timothy D Veenstra; Timothy J O'Leary; Jeffrey T Mason
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  The neXtProt peptide uniqueness checker: a tool for the proteomics community.

Authors:  Mathieu Schaeffer; Alain Gateau; Daniel Teixeira; Pierre-André Michel; Monique Zahn-Zabal; Lydie Lane
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.