Literature DB >> 3345320

Physiology based simulation model of triangle shape recognition.

Z Pizlo1.   

Abstract

The present paper considers the relation between the shape of a triangle and probability of its recognition. An effect of triangle size on perception of its shape is examined in the first experiment. In the second the loci of eye fixations during triangle recognition task are recorded and analysed. A simulation model of the recognition process is proposed. The model is based on two main assumptions: 1. an accuracy of shape processing is related to the cortical magnification factor, 2. a subject's response depends on actual position of eye fixation. The validity of the model is verified by comparing the theoretical and experimental response distributions. Some psycho-physiological implications are then discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3345320     DOI: 10.1007/bf00363955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  33 in total

1.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception.

Authors:  M D ARNOULT; F ATTNEAVE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Normal fixation of eccentric targets.

Authors:  R V Sansbury; A A Skavenski; G M Haddad; R M Steinman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1973-05

3.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor.

Authors:  V Virsu; J Rovamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A model of the perception of simple geometric figures.

Authors:  P C Vitz; T C Todd
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Why the cortical magnification factor in rhesus is isotropic.

Authors:  J C Letelier; F Varela
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Why the cortical magnification factor in rhesus can not be isotropic.

Authors:  B Sakitt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision.

Authors:  J Rovamo; V Virsu; R Näsänen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Size invariance: reply to Schwartz.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  B M Dow; A Z Snyder; R G Vautin; R Bauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays.

Authors:  H B Barlow; B C Reeves
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  3-D shape perception.

Authors:  Z Pizlo; M Salach-Golyska
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-07

2.  Spatially-global integration of closed, fragmented contours by finding the shortest-path in a log-polar representation.

Authors:  TaeKyu Kwon; Kunal Agrawal; Yunfeng Li; Zygmunt Pizlo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 1.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.